Saddam Hussein Sentenced to Death

Originally posted by Alliance
Maybe we should pour hemlock in his ear.

how weak. dont be a liberal wuss. can we not bring back disemboweling?
they could sell tickets so that our free and compassionate society can watch and cheer.

Lets show all our children what happens to the filthy muslims.

Originally posted by Imperial_Samura
Yes, but then so do many others. You make it sound outrageous that the US might try and influence the legal/political nature of another nation when it has been going on for a long, long time, and when other nations (usually Western) have been doing the same. [/B]

In the big picture what you say is absolutely true, more powerful countries always impose on weaker ones, it's a big bank take little bank mentality and it isn't a knew concept...

What would be outrageous would be the outcry if America made Iraq change hanging as it's means of execution (and has been even before the war) or outright denied Iraq to have the death penalty as you mentioned above.

Yeah! If Saddam hanged people. Why shouldn't we?

Originally posted by Alliance
Yeah! If Saddam hanged people. Why shouldn't we?

We don't.

*points to Saddam's future*

Originally posted by Robtard
We don't.

True. You are cooking them.

Originally posted by Bardock42
True. You are cooking them.

Or poisoning.

Originally posted by Alliance
*points to Saddam's future*

Hanging has been Iraq's method of execution long before America went in.

well, if "same as it ever was" is the goal, why did we oust him in the first place? 😖

Originally posted by PVS
well, if "same as it ever was" is the goal, why did we oust him in the first place? 😖

Good grief... What do you expect to happen? America to deny Iraq the death penalty even though we have it here?

Originally posted by Robtard
Good grief... What do you expect to happen? America to deny Iraq the death penalty even though we have it here?

irrelevant. i was simply pointing out the flaw in your reasoning

Originally posted by PVS
irrelevant. i was simply pointing out the flaw in your reasoning

No, your point was irrelevant... Should America impose and do anyway with everything Iraq had or did before the war as to avoid the "same as it ever was" clause?

its late. im too tired to dance. you said:

Originally posted by Robtard
Hanging has been Iraq's method of execution long before America went in.

the justification for hanging/death: iraq was already doing it.
doing it under saddam's rule...so then by that reasoning the new president should be allowed to use chemical weapons on shiites?
see where im going with this?

doesnt matter, i was just saying your reasoning is flawed.
the conclusion is irrelevant in what i was pointing out

Originally posted by PVS
its late. im too tired to dance. you said:

the justification for hanging/death: iraq was already doing it.
doing it under saddam's rule...so then by that reasoning the new president should be allowed to use chemical weapons on shiites?
see where im going with this?

doesnt matter, i was just saying your reasoning is flawed.

They have been hanging people long before Saddam took control, so it being seen as a negative because Saddam did it is irrelevant.

they also stoned women for being raped. why are we discussing justification of modern law via the stone age?

Originally posted by PVS
how weak. dont be a liberal wuss. can we not bring back disemboweling?
they could sell tickets so that our free and compassionate society can watch and cheer.

Originally posted by PVS
they also stoned women for being raped. why are we discussing justification of modern law via the stone age?

That is irrelevant... What do you want to happen then? America to deny Iraq it's right to capital punishment or just deny them specific ways of performing it?

Well, we already denied them a sadistic dictator, amirite?

Originally posted by Robtard
That is irrelevant... What do you want to happen then? America to deny Iraq it's right to capital punishment or just deny them specific ways of performing it?

im not arguing that. in fact i agree. its (supposed to be) their democracy to do as they wish.

i was challenging your flawed reasoning regarding their past justifying the ethics of death penalty/hanging.

i hate repeating myself