The Evolution of Beauty

Originally posted by reggie_jax
i never said i dont have sex.. i just don't value whorez as anything more than what they are - objects of effection.

yeah $hort, u know how we do em treat bitches like red lights and run right thru em.

CheckmewhileIwreckthemicpsyche.

i may **** ugly bitchez, but not as a favor to them. i take advantage of the emotionally downtrodden.. there's nothin redeemable about it. wordisbond.

That's so cute! Are you a fluffy bunny?

The only beauty is change - if you think about it, anything that's static bores one into boredom eventually.

Commercial beauty depends on the desire for statis. Ageing is the enemy.

Originally posted by Imperial_Samura
Freckles aren't bad, though I don't particularly like Jolie whether she is made up or not. I never could understand the whole "she is the most beautiful women on the planet."

But fascinating clip, so much work, essentially creating an entirely new image, because the girl is almost unrecognisable by the end.

I'm trying to remember what idiom it is that states it's better to work harder now than have to work harder later, but the only one that keeps coming to mind is the "A bird in the hand..." one.

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
Commercial beauty depends on the desire for statis. Ageing is the enemy.It probably would save a lot of time and effort in the long run to go out and find a girl who actually looks like the end product.

I'm trying to remember what idiom it is that states it's better to work harder now than have to work harder later, but the only one that keeps coming to mind is the "A bird in the hand..." one.

Hehe...'cause he was breaking the house.

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
It probably would save a lot of time and effort in the long run to go out and find a girl who actually looks like the end product.

In many instances, this is what agencies do. It is more cost-effective to use models who do not need a lot of "work," then it is to pay for production and post-production work.

I hate fat girls who say "beauty is on the inside" then go off and talk shit about how every girl prettier then her is a whore.

My opinion is that some girls have looks, some have good personalities, and then there are those gems that have both. Those are the ones that I go for.

Originally posted by KidRock
I hate fat girls who say "beauty is on the inside" then go off and talk shit about how every girl prettier then her is a whore.

I know, Fat chicks suck 😘

Originally posted by docb77
My opinion is that some girls have looks, some have good personalities, and then there are those gems that have both. Those are the ones that I go for.

Originally posted by Lord Urizen
I know, Fat chicks suck 😘

Originally posted by reggie_jax
look at this simple-minded shit.. "U KANT GET LAID.." as if pussy is the yardstick to humanity..

what's so hard to get.. i place no value in a whore wanting to spend her time with me.. i prefer the tought of violating her to the notion of us having a mutually beneficial relationship..

you go ahead and pander to the money hungry bitchez.. i want no part of it. like i said.. bitchez hear money jingling in ur pockets and of course they want some.. only a sucker would mistake this for a reason to boost his self esteem..

Hmmm - psychologically concerning. And sad. Mainly sad.

i may **** ugly bitchez, but not as a favor to them. i take advantage of the emotionally downtrodden.. there's nothin redeemable about it. wordisbond.

Unless you are Whob, in which case you are irredeemably pitiful.

It probably would save a lot of time and effort in the long run to go out and find a girl who actually looks like the end product.

I'm trying to remember what idiom it is that states it's better to work harder now than have to work harder later, but the only one that keeps coming to mind is the "A bird in the hand..." one.

Indeed, and such girls do exist. It seems somewhat concerning that ideals of beauty in this day and age can so often be based upon technological wizardry - even more so when images used to advertise a cosmetics (eg - you'll look like this if you use our product) are no indicative of reality.

Reminds me of a recent study done by Choice Magazine (the consumer watchdog magazine in Australia) - where they looked at breads. Wholemeal is a type of flour - yet many breads instead of using actual wholemeal flour (which is best) refine the wholemeal down so it is white flour, and that add wholemeal back to it. Madness.

But is is a good thing Dove did their whole "natural" beauty campaign, while their is probably something cynical behind it it is still good when a cooperation makes a step in the right direction.

*Sighs.*

You're = you are.
Your = something that is owned by you.

There = location.
Their = something that is owned by them.
They're = they are.

They're, awl good samurais should no there homonyms.

Originally posted by FeceMan
They're, awl good samurais should no there homonyms.

Oh, that's clever! You made those mistakes in the last sentence on purpose because it would make it funny, right?

Anal = a place where boats can come inland, but without the sea.

*sigh, sigh, sigh, my life is shit, OK, now I'm dead*

*sigh*

I do enjoy a good pun now and then.

Originally posted by FeceMan
*Sighs.*

You're = you are.
Your = something that is owned by you.

There = location.
Their = something that is owned by them.
They're = they are.

They're, awl good samurais should no there homonyms.

Oh waily, waily, waily. There I go again with some of my exceedingly rare grammatical errors, causing terrible trauma to our good friend FeceMan.

Oh, a thousand humble pardons oh great and terrible Grammar Nazi! I am not worthy, but I will take your most benevolent teachings on board, so I my writings won't offend you divine eyes in future!

And out of appreciation for your most insightful lessons I'll assume you were intending some form of humor by spelling "all" awl and "know" no -despite the fact I don't tend to write sentences like that. But in the spirit of annoying you I think I'll continue to overuse "your" - yes, because I don't want you to feel you lack purpose if I never make grammatical errors again. You have to retain your purpose - I mean its not like there are other members whose crimes against the English language are far greater then my own on these forums.

*grovel, scrape, whimper*

Well, at least you realize it.

You seem to be making these errors more frequently as of late, so I figured that I would give you a helping nudge in the right direction.

Originally posted by Imperial_Samura
You have to retain your purpose - I mean its not like there are other members whose crimes against the English language are far greater then my on these forums.

"then my"? "then my"? What the hell is "then my" doing there? Do you mean 'thin man'? How about 'thin men'? 'bread biscuit'? 'cheese wizard'? What do you mean, "then my"? Please, tell us...

Originally posted by Ya Krunk'd Floo
"then my"? "then my"? What the hell is "then my" doing there? Do you mean 'thin man'? How about 'thin men'? 'bread biscuit'? 'cheese wizard'? What do you mean, "then my"? Please, tell us...

😐

Edit: I just realised I wrote statis instead of stasis. I feel so dirty.