Originally posted by FeceMan
What about those that have neither?
Oh, those exist too - but I thought we were talking about beauty, and those girls don't have inner or outer beauty. Hot stuck-up girls have the outer, "sweet spirits" have the inner, and then there's those that approach perfection that have both.
Originally posted by FeceMan
Guys, stop posting.I can't win KMC unless my name is in the "last post" column as many times as possible (within certain parameters).
Win KMC? I didn't know it was a contest.
Originally posted by docb77
Oh, those exist too - but I thought we were talking about beauty, and those girls don't have inner or outer beauty. Hot stuck-up girls have the outer, "sweet spirits" have the inner, and then there's those that approach perfection that have both.
I know many girls who have both.
Originally posted by Ya Krunk'd Floo
"then my"? "then my"? What the hell is "then my" doing there? Do you mean 'thin man'? How about 'thin men'? 'bread biscuit'? 'cheese wizard'? What do you mean, "then my"? Please, tell us...
Then my own my dear man. Then my own. I noticed the flaw in my post and had corrected it either as you were posting your critique or shortly afterwards.
Guys, stop posting.I can't win KMC unless my name is in the "last post" column as many times as possible (within certain parameters).
If your (hahahaha), ok , ok, if you are wanting your name to be last in as many threads as possible wouldn't it make sense to go to the forums with very low member activity (such as the philosophy forum, or some of the movie forums, etc) and post there? That way you'd be keeping dying forums alive and getting your name down.
Originally posted by Imperial_Samura
Then my own my dear man. Then my own. I noticed the flaw in my post and had corrected it either as you were posting your critique or shortly afterwards.
I could go on with this parade, but I like you, and I want this to stop; you mean to use 'than', not 'then'.
You're welcome, cupcake.
Originally posted by FeceMan
A better translation would be: "Those other forums are trash forums. Why would I go there when I could just post here?"
The rational answer is you wouldn't, nobody would (though the philosophy forum isn't so bad.) Unless one was playing an imaginary game of "win KMC", which sounds like an undernourished version of "win the Internet." Though people usually win the Internet after doing a great deed of awesome posting, as opposed to just "being the last post in a thread."
I could go on with this parade, but I like you, and I want this to stop; you mean to use 'than', not 'then'.You're welcome, cupcake.
Of course I did, though I was hoping FeceMan would pick up on it first - but since I like you as well I wont begrudge you mentioning it.
Originally posted by reggie_jax
samurai; are you an android or what?if u act like a *****, nigga u get smacked like a ***** - snoop dogg
Well.... at least that is original as far as rebuttals go. Original and stupid. You best go off and do some unemotional violating of yourself while you think up your next zinger.
Yes, of course! It was intentional!(I still like you, even if once upon a time you did tell me about your hats...)
I remember that. Ah memories.
Originally posted by reggie_jax
yea. cuz anyone who doesn't submit to cheap hedonism is pitiful (if u wuz kabable ov pitee)bitchez get horny, niggaz die - tupac
Funny, it is usually the opposite - the individual (let us say you) who claims they have no emotional connection to the person they sleep with is usually considered hedonistic when compared to someone who actually dedicates both emotional and intellectual side of a sexual relationship...
Oops silly. It is unlikely you have either dedicated time to a relationship or been a part of one.