When I 'rediscovered' Superman in his animated series, I was nigh shocked by how much weaker he seemed than in the comics. But oddly enough, it also made him (for me) a more interesting character.
I have mixed feelings about the military being effective against him. On the one hand, it could make Clark a more relatable character. On the other hand: No, sorry, uh-uh. He's Superman. He should not need an oxygen mask to breathe in space; and neither should bombs and missiles affect him.
So I don't know. If the film does a good job all around, maybe it won't matter.
Originally posted by spidermanrocks
Now that I thought more about it, I don't think we should jump to conclusions just yet. How do we know the military doesn't have something that makes him more vulnerable? Like Kryptonite? There is also the possibility that Zod exposed him to it and temporarily weakened him. We'll just have to wait and see. Context can make a huge difference.
I V8 forehead-slapped myself when I read this.