Superman: Man of Steel

Started by DARTH POWER111 pages
Originally posted by SMIFF-N-WESSON
(raises hand) I have a motion.....
Why do yall think the Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders have a reality show?
Because everyone tunes in to see some sexy Blondes OR to study cheering manuvers..just sayin.

Yeah true. But look at the title "Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders".

Like you said full of sexy blondes. Did something like Smallville have anywhere near the sex appeal of that? Like I said the whole sex appeal thing becomes more relevant when it comes to shows like that or 90210, Melrose Place e.t.c.

But even then, the hot women alone won't keep those shows going in the long run Imho.

Originally posted by SMIFF-N-WESSON
Do people go to strip clubs for the cheap drinks OR to watch naked women?....just sayin...

Well for the naked women obviously. But that's why they're called STRIP Clubs. If Smallville was called Stripville then believe me there would be a whole different audience.

Originally posted by SMIFF-N-WESSON
But back to the topic...why Superman movies sucked.
Lets try this one: Let ole Singer direct some episodes for Lois n Clark and Smallville.

Well they didn't all suck. Superman 1 & 2 are both classics.

But btw by this whole argument about attractive women we'd have to say the only reason more Thor made slightly more revenue than SR was because of Natalie Portman then wouldn't we??!!

SR didn't even have a hot girl.

When I wanna check out hot babes, I turn to Fox News.

Originally posted by -Pr-
I thought Smallville was a poor representation of Superman (the individual person) for the most part. Thankfully, when it had a good supporting cast (Lionel, Lex, Chloe, Green Arrow, the JSA) it was much more watchable imo.

Lana was ****ing horrid though. They basically had her keep Clark's balls in a jar on her bedside table at times.

i thought she was the biggest b!tch of a c0ck tease, that lana lang.. no arguing that she was hot, but i would've banged chloe first before lana..

Originally posted by emporerpants
I have only one thing to say...if having a hot girl is all it takes to make something popular....why have so many movies failed that had hot chicks? Why isn't every movie that Megan fox is in super popular? Are all of those romantic comedies that have hot chicks super popular with dudes simply because they have hot chicks? smiff - n -wesson, by your logic men would watch pretty much nothing but romantic comedies because they usually have hot women.

Also, I find it hard to believe that someone would shell out that much money for a movie or waste that much time watching a show that they hate just to see a hot chick that doesn't even get naked when the internet is available for hardcore porn.

No one is denying that sex sells and can make a difference. But to say it is frequently the only factor, or to say that people watched 10 years of a show just because of "teh hot girlzz!!!1" is silly.

...and you missed the logic train by a long shot
Son let me spoon feed you my point. I watch romantic comidies with my ole lady..other than that..I dont watch them at all. Guys who watch romantic comedies watch them because they may like the sensitive stories and emotional output. On the other hand if you watch baywatch (whitch sucked ) or americas top model....they both are horrible shows but most would watch them to see the chicks. Your point on porn....cmon man apply common sense. chocking your chicken while watching models on a runway...well you do what you like. Ill stick to real women and good movies.

Originally posted by DARTH POWER
Yeah true. But look at the title "Dallas Cowboys [b]Cheerleaders".

Like you said full of sexy blondes. Did something like Smallville have anywhere near the sex appeal of that? Like I said the whole sex appeal thing becomes more relevant when it comes to shows like that or 90210, Melrose Place e.t.c.

But even then, the hot women alone won't keep those shows going in the long run Imho.

Well for the naked women obviously. But that's why they're called STRIP Clubs. If Smallville was called Stripville then believe me there would be a whole different audience.

Well they didn't all suck. Superman 1 & 2 are both classics.

But btw by this whole argument about attractive women we'd have to say the only reason more Thor made slightly more revenue than SR was because of Natalie Portman then wouldn't we??!!

SR didn't even have a hot girl. [/B]

I meant to say movies by singer..but you get what I mean.

Originally posted by emporerpants
I have only one thing to say...if having a hot girl is all it takes to make something popular....why have so many movies failed that had hot chicks? Why isn't every movie that Megan fox is in super popular? Are all of those romantic comedies that have hot chicks super popular with dudes simply because they have hot chicks? smiff - n -wesson, by your logic men would watch pretty much nothing but romantic comedies because they usually have hot women.

Also, I find it hard to believe that someone would shell out that much money for a movie or waste that much time watching a show that they hate just to see a hot chick that doesn't even get naked when the internet is available for hardcore porn.

No one is denying that sex sells and can make a difference. But to say it is frequently the only factor, or to say that people watched 10 years of a show just because of "teh hot girlzz!!!1" is silly.

megan fox is a horrible actress but you know who she is and her filmography. i'm sure you've seen more than her (almost) billion dollar transformer movies.

Originally posted by Mindship
When I wanna check out hot babes, I turn to Fox News.

LOL there are plenty of Blondes on fox indeed sir.

Originally posted by jedi90
megan fox is a horrible actress but you know who she is and her filmography. i'm sure you've seen more than her (almost) billion dollar transformer movies.

Transformers..
.oh yea that right i couldnt bring myself to watch that nonsense. let me guess, the movie mostly involved her and some poor excuse for a man and a love story?

Originally posted by DARTH POWER
#

Exactly. As if Smallville was the first show to work out that an attractive woman can attract viewers. Pretty much every show uses that. It hardly gives a competitive edge anymore. Just keeps you in the game.

But honestly it would have more of an impact on shows like 90210, Baywatch and Melrose Place, where those shows are just full of hot girls and it's about their relationshps and there's a lot of raunchy scenes.

And yet you know what? Even shows like that have been known to flop.

Saying Smallville was only a success because of Lana Lang and later Lois Lane is like saying Transformers was only a huge hit because of Megan Fox. But Like you've rightly pointed out many of Megan Fox's films have bombed hard! And I don't see the actresses who played Lana Lang and Lois Lane on Smallville being in huge demand by every network.

reading is fundamental.

no one ever said smallville is only successful becuase of the hot chicks that appear on teh show.

i told you earlier the show was aimed at high school girls and young women. they started adding more "hot chicks" to keep viewers like you watching (which you admitted) and to get more guys interested.

Originally posted by SMIFF-N-WESSON
Transformers..
.oh yea that right i couldnt bring myself to watch that nonsense. let me guess, the movie mostly involved her and some poor excuse for a man and a love story?

hey how did you know?!

you know what's funny? when megan fox started to display more than two brain cells she was fired and replaced with another botoxed woman cause michael bay knew the guys couldn't do without the eye candy.

Originally posted by jedi90
megan fox is a horrible actress but you know who she is and her filmography. i'm sure you've seen more than her (almost) billion dollar transformer movies.

Megan Fox huh...i just took a look at her.
She's not ugly but not a stallion either. Flat chested, flat reared, bronze tan, caked make-up and looks like a 1/2 way sober lindsey lohan. but hey some of you guys like that so please enjoy!!!

Originally posted by DARTH POWER
Yeah true. But look at the title "Dallas Cowboys [b]Cheerleaders".

Like you said full of sexy blondes. Did something like Smallville have anywhere near the sex appeal of that? Like I said the whole sex appeal thing becomes more relevant when it comes to shows like that or 90210, Melrose Place e.t.c.

But even then, the hot women alone won't keep those shows going in the long run Imho.

Well for the naked women obviously. But that's why they're called STRIP Clubs. If Smallville was called Stripville then believe me there would be a whole different audience.

Well they didn't all suck. Superman 1 & 2 are both classics.

But btw by this whole argument about attractive women we'd have to say the only reason more Thor made slightly more revenue than SR was because of Natalie Portman then wouldn't we??!!

SR didn't even have a hot girl. [/B]

the funny thing about smallville was that most of the sex appeal was in the advertisement more that the actual show. the show was already popular with the women and teens, not so much with men.

thor had cute girls but the movie was aimed at males and general public. Singer doesn't like hot chicks so he gave you hot guys
😮

Originally posted by jedi90
the funny thing about smallville was that most of the sex appeal was in the advertisement more that the actual show. the show was already popular with the women and teens, not so much with men.

thor had cute girls but the movie was aimed at males and general public. Singer doesn't like hot chicks so he gave you hot guys
😮

(applause)

This is the last time I'm going to say this:

Originally posted by -Pr-
Guys, talk of Singer's sexuality has no place in this thread, so please keep it out.

Next person to bring it up gets warned.

MOS is #1 on Newsarama's comic movies to look for in 2013.

http://www.newsarama.com/film/10-to-watch-in-2013-films-1.html

Didn't know they were making a DBZ movie.

Originally posted by jedi90

i told you earlier the show was aimed at high school girls and young women. they started adding more "hot chicks" to keep viewers like you watching (which you admitted) and to get more guys interested.

No not at all. When did they start "adding" hot chicks? Lana was there from season 1. Lois came in season 4 as a semi-occuring character. She appeared more and more as a main character when it was time for Lana to leave.

Supergirl only lasted 1 season. And wasn't even in many episodes in that season.

And finally Tess replaced Lex! Tbh Lex probably brought in more viewers.

So I'm really not seeing at which point they began to "add" hot girls just to bring in male viewers.

Me and many of my pals watched it from the first season. As did many of my female friends who were much older than teenagers.

Originally posted by Golgo13
MOS is #1 on Newsarama's comic movies to look for in 2013.

http://www.newsarama.com/film/10-to-watch-in-2013-films-1.html

Didn't know they were making a DBZ movie.

Cool. Let's hope we get some epicness!

Originally posted by Golgo13
MOS is #1 on Newsarama's comic movies to look for in 2013.

http://www.newsarama.com/film/10-to-watch-in-2013-films-1.html

Didn't know they were making a DBZ movie.

I am just looking for a good film.. with good story and good action

Dear god not another dbz movie....are are you talking the animated one?

Looks to be animated