SpunkySmurph
tu quoqumber
Originally posted by Ize19
And no, he doesn't prove to be tactically superior, just because he managed to take advantage of a weakened Wolverine who was in the air. That's like saying that, if Wolverine were to take on Captain America for instance, and Captain America was dominating the entire fight, without it having any affect on Wolverine, then, in the end, due to one nice maneuver on Wolverine's part, he wins the fight.
Just because Wolverine won the fight, he doesn't prove that he's more skilled than Captain America. Also, just because Cap scored more hits than Wolverine, it doesn't prove that he has an edge in skill either, due to that simply being a part of Wolverine's fighting style.
The problem with this analogy is that your use of this as a response makes it seem like you think that I think that DP pulled a nice manuever, which therefore means that he is tactfully superior, which THEREFORE means that he won.
What I am saying is close to that except for the last part.
If Wolverine was fighting Captain America, and Cap appears to have the edge for most of the battle (though his blows are useless as they arn't doing any damage), and, at the end, Wolvy lured Cap into a trap, and gutted him, and Cap hadn't shown any sort of manuevers that battle, I would say Wolvy had demonstrated superior tactics. Would that mean he won? No, not neccessarily. But, in terms of this fight, I have only defended DP- I havent been one that said that 'OMG he pwned Wolvereen!!1!1!!111!!'.