Originally posted by botankus
It's from South Park the Movie
leave him be. i was just throwing him a bone, since he cant seem to grasp the real debate
:edit: and the name of the movies is "south park: bigger longer and uncut" DUMBASS!!!!!11
(that was another bone...now lets sit back and watch as he triumphantly gnarls it)
Originally posted by Starhawk
Which I never accused you off. And has already been addressed if you read over the last few pages.Is your entire debating skill consist of bringing up points which have already been addressed?
to pity a criminal is to support and defend them. 😬
speaking of things which were never said nor implied (me pitying rapists and murderers.) way to go captain hypocrisy!!! 👆
Originally posted by PVS
to pity a criminal is to support and defend them. 😬speaking of things which were never said nor implied (me pitying rapists and murderers.) way to go captain hypocrisy!!! 👆
Pity does not equal support at all. To support them is to approve of their acts. To pity them is to feel sorry for them. Not the same thing at all. You really do like to try and twist what people say.
Originally posted by Starhawk
You said you feel sorry for them due to their mental affliction.
no, i said that i have pity for those who struggle with a mental affliction. a child rapist has apparently given up the struggle hasnt it?
and now for what i actually said, which you failed to quote as usual
maybe you should try reading it this time:
Originally posted by PVS
i feel compassion for people who have to struggle with psychological disorders
which they are afflicted with and never asked/wished for. "there but for the
grace of god" if you will. and as i said, i would not want retarded people put
to death because some developmentally disabled people are violent and
dangerous. how come you want to kill all retarded people. have you no
compassion?(see what i did there? take note, see how it applies to your own logical
fallacies, and how annoying it is, and then grow from the experience by
ceasing the strawman bashing and baseless conclusions)