Ironman vs. Ivisible Woman

Originally posted by Evangel94
Ah yes someone trying to dismiss it....just because it's old doesn't mean it's wrong. That's a logical fallacy.

Canon is canon whether you like it or not. Now you're just getting desperate now and trying to label this as "PIS".

Sue hates killing. Creating a bubble inside someone's body is not her normal form of attack... esp. against other heroes!

You know what's funny?
When you show concrete evidence and people still try to argue a moot point.
My god, she posted the scan proving that IM bested Sue, but people still sticks with the bubble in your insides argument. How many times has Sue done it? It is not something conducive to the character anyway.

Hardly concrete evidence as her sheilds as stated are not constructed that way anymore. Just like how Cyclops optic blasts have changed over the years, they don't have the same origins.

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
In the time it takes someone to say "It appears you have" IW can't put up a forcefield?

On the word "have" Iron Man has charged an magnetic pulse bolt into his arm in 0.002 milliseconds. As in, Once Crymson Dynamo started speaking the word "have", Iron man supercharged his arm in 0.002 milliseconds. A human can't obviousely say "have" in 0.002 seconds.

Man you really reaching 😬. The scan is right in front of you and I have to teach grammar lessons. tsk tsk. Shameful.

Originally posted by xmarksthespot


Psionic energy manipulation. Either way they're composed of hyperspace force or energy not made of atoms.

Your first marvel book scan even says she mentally generates a psionic field of "invisible force" drawn from hyperspace. It doesn't say her fields are made of "hyperspace energy" as you put it.

Your second scan mentions psionic manipulation, but no where in that entire 2nd scan does it even mention to the word "hyperspace".

SO you have one scan that contractdicts the other. If we go by your standards and use the 2004 Marvel Handbook , which you so gladly pointed out was newer than my scan, it definitely overrides anything your 2nd "dated" scan mentions.

Nice try. You can't use both since one is newer than the other.

Originally posted by King_Mungi
Hardly concrete evidence as her sheilds as stated are not constructed that way anymore. Just like how Cyclops optic blasts have changed over the years, they don't have the same origins.

jESUS Christ man. THIS IS A MARVEL COMIX. do you know how stupid what you are saying sounds?
How more freaking specific can this be for you? This is straight from the horse's mouth and you are disputing it?
C'mon sometimes arguing something pointless denotes more stupidity than just gracefully shutting your mouth. I think you are proving the former point

Originally posted by LordFear
jESUS Christ man. THIS IS A MARVEL COMIX. do you know how stupid what you are saying sounds?
How more freaking specific can this be for you? This is straight from the horse's mouth and you are disputing it?
C'mon sometimes arguing something pointless denotes more stupidity than just gracefully shutting your mouth. I think you are proving the former point

Wow thanks for reminding me Captain Wow this is like comparing current Spider-Man to his first apperances, it's not the same. Not hard to grasp at all, everyone has gotten an upgrade and the fact as I noted her origins of her invisible constructs have changed just like how various other characters powers have changed over the years. It's like using Superman's first apperance as a guage as how he acts and his powers are for the rest of his career. Do you know what powers Superman had in his first apperance?

Evangel94 you really aren't getting it, are you?

That scan is before a power upgrade. Invisible Girl (in the scan) is not the same character base we are using in this match up.

We aren't comparing current IW to original IM, are we?

Someone is bitter thier tourney failed.

Wait I minute, I remember you Lordfear you believe Iron Man could beat Supergirl....ha!

Originally posted by What If...
That scan is before a power upgrade. Invisible Girl (in the scan) is not the same character base we are using in this match up.

We aren't comparing current IW to original IM, are we?

Exactally what I was saying.

Originally posted by King_Mungi
Wait I minute, I remember you Lordfear you believe Iron Man could beat Supergirl....ha!

Yeah and reading your posts in this thread. I offered more valid arguments than you. You know you should be a good politician, you have a great way of deflecting the current issue being debated

Originally posted by LordFear
Yeah and reading your posts in this thread. I offered more valid arguments than you. You know you should be a good politician, you have a great way of deflecting the current issue being debated

haha no you didn't, notice everyone except you and Ev were on Iron Man's side. Delusions, simple delusions. Right, and didn't you basically just ignore my above post? haha. Captain Wow indeed

Originally posted by What If...
Evangel94 you really aren't getting it, are you?

That scan is before a power upgrade. Invisible Girl (in the scan) is not the same character base we are using in this match up.

We aren't comparing current IW to original IM, are we?

Who are you? You're not even involved in this debate.

We're debating the composition of Sue Richard's forcefield.

Xmarksthespot posts scans and takes a consistant stand. Who exactly are you? A bandwagon jumper? Let the grown-ups handle their business while you can run off.

Originally posted by What If...

Someone is bitter thier tourney failed.

Look at the top of the page pancake. Do you see two tournament threads with "EVANGEL94" in the title going on right now? In fact I don't even see your name anywhere or even in any of the tournaments going on right now.

In fact, you're not even fit to vote publicly in my tournament. Talk to me when you rack up a couple hundred more posts.

How does it feel? Must feel pretty bad knowing your Spider-Woman Respect thread failed.

why are we discussing IW's power source? I mean when it comes down to it, she is more of defensive character rather than offensive. This is how she is most oftenly portrayed. Unless if her powers are cosmic who the hell cares?

Originally posted by LordFear
why are we discussing IW's power source? I mean when it comes down to it, she is more of defensive character rather than offensive. This is how she is most oftenly portrayed. Unless if her powers are cosmic who the hell cares?

Are you reading the debate? Invisible Woman's shields are vastly stronger, more durable and she is far more skilled when she first gained the ability to make constructs. As I mentioned before, Cyclops blasts were just concussive blasts stored energy from the sun and released. However, today he taps into an unlimited amount of energy from a unspecified dimension and his eyes are the gateway. Huge difference. Where you get your power from can greatly alter you, as it did Spider-Man when he discovered about the magical totems.

Who are you? You're not even involved in this debate.

I participate in any thread I want, thanks sweety.

Do you see two tournament threads with "EVANGEL94" in the title going on right now?

In fact, you're not even fit to vote publicly in my tournament. Talk to me when you rack up a couple hundred more posts.

Someone is bitter that their Spider-Woman Respect thread failed.

Hardly.
I posted, what, 8 scans?....I would hardly call it a respect thread rather than something I thought would be fun to do but it became feckless.

Originally posted by What If...

Nice "ninja" edit you did there.

You must have really low standards considering I only sent you 1 single invitation. That's hardly "flooding".

Now either debate the topic of this thread or stop derailing the thread.

oh noez. I edited my post?

Really Evangel, you need to stop spamming this thread and taking it off-topic.

Originally posted by Evangel94
[b]On the word "have" Iron Man has charged an magnetic pulse bolt into his arm in 0.002 milliseconds. As in, Once Crymson Dynamo started speaking the word "have", Iron man supercharged his arm in 0.002 milliseconds. A human can't obviousely say "have" in 0.002 seconds.

Man you really reaching 😬. The scan is right in front of you and I have to teach grammar lessons. tsk tsk. Shameful.[/B]

Originally posted by Evangel94
Your first marvel book scan even says she mentally generates a [b]psionic field of "invisible force" drawn from hyperspace. It doesn't say her fields are made of "hyperspace energy" as you put it.

Your second scan mentions psionic manipulation, but no where in that entire 2nd scan does it even mention to the word "hyperspace".

SO you have one scan that contractdicts the other. If we go by your standards and use the 2004 Marvel Handbook , which you so gladly pointed out was newer than my scan, it definitely overrides anything your 2nd "dated" scan mentions.

Nice try. You can't use both since one is newer than the other. [/B]

Originally posted by Evangel94
Who are you? You're not even involved in this debate.

We're debating the composition of Sue Richard's forcefield.

Xmarksthespot posts scans and takes a consistant stand. Who exactly are you? A bandwagon jumper? Let the grown-ups handle their business while you can run off.

Look at the top of the page pancake. Do you see two tournament threads with "EVANGEL94" in the title going on right now? In fact I don't even see your name anywhere or even in any of the tournaments going on right now.

In fact, you're not even fit to vote publicly in my tournament. Talk to me when you rack up a couple hundred more posts.

How does it feel? Must feel pretty bad knowing your Spider-Woman Respect thread failed.

...and reported for being a pretentious stuck up b*tch.

u can't have only one pretentious stuck up ***** in an argument.

Just drop it.

Originally posted by Trolt
u can't have only one pretentious stuck up ***** in an argument.

Just drop it.

You make no sense. Also unless I see the words MOD under your name then your not one to be spouting orders.

Originally posted by grey fox
You make no sense. Also unless I see the words MOD under your name then your not one to be spouting orders.

There are ministry of defence members on these forums? 😛