Originally posted by Enyalus
That's completely wrong. Even if Starbreaker had the power of multiple stars (unproven), he wasn't actively pulling against them so it's totally moot. They were moving the Earth back into its orbit as I recall...
It is mentioned exactly in the comic that Starbreaker has consumed multiple stars. Superman's quote says that Starbreakers pull is getting stronger thus proving he was pulling against him. Also add the fact that Superman was also pulling against the Sun's gravity.
Originally posted by h1a8
It is mentioned exactly in the comic that Starbreaker has consumed multiple stars. Superman's quote says that Starbreakers pull is getting stronger thus proving he was pulling against him. Also add the fact that Superman was also pulling against the Sun's gravity.
Originally posted by h1a8Shields and reflexes to neagte his speed advantage along with superior durability and power.
Thanos is not superior in speed, strength, fighting ability, and blunt force durability.Even if u argue the latter three, it would be a waste of time as it is irrelevant. Why? Because speed is the trump card for Superman here.
Superman will pop Thanos before Thanos can act and form a combo to ko.
Also Superman has the speed to avoid any of Thanos attacks. He can also crumble Thanos shields with constant bombardment.
Originally posted by h1a8
GL wasn't pulling. But even if he was and Superman just supplying half the power then this means Superman was exerting forces greater than many stars weights of force.The first scan is garbage as Superman can destroy planets and moons with a mere blow. Plus Thor's hammer supplies a lot of the striking force since it moves according to Thor's will. Also moving planets takes far more force than destroying them with a blow.
The second scan has nothing to do with strength but magic alone. If those hammers weren't enchanted then that feat would have never happened.
Your post doesnt make any sense. Enyalus already owned you so I'm going to leave you alone.
Originally posted by quanchi112
Shields and reflexes to neagte his speed advantage along with superior durability and power.
Reflexes are meaningless unless one has the necessary speed to go with it. Thanos doesn't!
Also, Superman, if he choose to, can pop Thanos before he puts up a shield. If Superman chooses to let him put up a shield then Superman can simply crumble them under constant bombardment. Thanos can't attack while under his shield so he's a sitting duck.
Originally posted by h1a8
Reflexes are meaningless unless one has the necessary speed to go with it. Thanos doesn't!
Originally posted by h1a8
Also, Superman, if he choose to, can pop Thanos before he puts up a shield.
Originally posted by h1a8
If Superman chooses to let him put up a shield then Superman can simply crumble them under constant bombardment.
Originally posted by h1a8
Thanos can't attack while under his shield so he's a sitting duck.
Also, I don't know what your obsession with H2H is, when Thanos can let loose with an omnidirectional blast as soon as Superman begins hitting his shielding.
Originally posted by EnyalusThanos doesn't have FTL reflexes. He has only light speed reflexes outside of 15ft.Stop lying. Going by your own logic, Thanos has FTL reflexes. [/B]
Thanos doesn't have FTL reflexes nor the necessary speed even if he did and will get popped before he gets a shield up.Wrong. Half a kilometer apart when the match starts and FTL reflexes means Thanos will have his shield up before Superman ever reaches him.
Galactus doesn't even have enough power to destroy 1 millionth of a universe. Also adding the fact that Galactus was weak there makes it nothing. Lastly, energy durability has nothing to do with physical blunt force durability.Also wrong. Since Galactus had to deplete vital energies to do so. And Galactus has enough power inside him to destroy two universes.
Fallen One didn't prove he moved anywhere near as fast as Superman could. So that feat proves nothing.Wrong thrice over. In fact, in this very thread I've posted a scan where Thanos shields against Fallen One, stopping his bullrush and attacks out of it.
Thanos would get a chance to flinch. Even so such omnidirectional blasts wouldn't do anything to Superman. Superman could go through them like nothing. Omnidirectional blasts are astronomically weaker than their respective straight blasts.Also, I don't know what your obsession with H2H is, when Thanos can let loose with an omnidirectional blast as soon as Superman begins hitting his shielding.
Originally posted by h1a8
Thanos doesn't have FTL reflexes. He has only light speed reflexes outside of 15ft.
Originally posted by h1a8
Thanos doesn't have FTL reflexes nor the necessary speed even if he did and will get popped before he gets a shield up.
Originally posted by h1a8
Galactus doesn't even have enough power to destroy 1 millionth of a universe.
Originally posted by h1a8
Lastly, energy durability has nothing to do with physical blunt force durability.
Originally posted by h1a8
Fallen One didn't prove he moved anywhere near as fast as Superman could. So that feat proves nothing.
Originally posted by h1a8
Even so such omnidirectional blasts wouldn't do anything to Superman. Superman could go through them like nothing. Omnidirectional blasts are astronomically weaker than straight blasts.
Thanos crushes Superman. No amount of nonsensical speculation, "writer intentions" and H1 pseudo-physics will ever change that.
Originally posted by EnyalusYour making up the facts that the beam was light speed. 🙄Making more shit up again huh? He backhanded away a light speed beam from a few meters away. You're wrong. I'm right. Deal with it.
[/B]
Negatives are always fact by default unless proven otherwise.
He does, and no he won't. You have absolutely zero proof for either postulation that you present as fact.
Stated and truth are two different things. Spider-man stated that Sentry stalemated Galactus. I guess Sentry has the power to destroy two universes huh. 🙄 Also you are making up stuff by implying that Galactus was using enough energy to destroy two universes on Thanos shields. Stop it or I'll report you.Keep making up shit like this and I'll report you. It's flatly stated, plain as day, in the Annihilation comics. Canonical and factual. None of your wistful fantasies make it anything less than true.
It big time matters as energy blasts don't quite have the concussive powers of a physical hit. They have more burning or matter manipulation power. Superman's HV can burn through objects which is different than punching through objects.It's a shield. Energy, blunt force, doesn't matter. It's a shield.
Fallen One can only move at such speeds after he has traveled a certain distance. He can't reach light speed within battle distance (within 3m).
Fallen One can move at faster than light speeds. Proven once again in the Annihilation comics. Come correct with your shit, or don't come at all. Once you read the comics in question, get back to me. Otherwise, be quiet and maybe you won't get so embarrassed in every argument you get into.
Show me who they one shotted. And also prove that it wasn't a low showing by the high herald since Thanos regular blasts failed to one-shot a high herald leveler before. Lastly prove that the high herald who was one-shotted is as durable as Superman. Also a gas station one-shotted Superman. That doesn't prove that it could one-shot Captain Marvel or Thor.More of your unproven, ridiculous and biased speculation. Thanos has one-shotted high heralds with those omnidirectional blasts. They'd put Superman on the ground at bare minimum.
I agree.Superman crushes Thanos with the combo to ko. No amount of nonsensical speculation, "writer intentions" and H1 pseudo-physics will ever change that.
Originally posted by OneDumbG0
^ Superman cannot reach light speed within 3 meters either. Irrelevant for you to keep trying to hold that against other characters as if it means anything. You're basing your entire argument on a made-up feat.
Originally posted by OneDumbG0Of course he can. He vibrated instantly to FTL speeds, blitzed faster than his HV, and instant appeared around the world.
^ Superman cannot reach light speed within 3 meters either. Irrelevant for you to keep trying to hold that against other characters as if it means anything. You're basing your entire argument on a made-up feat.
Originally posted by EnyalusDoesn't matter as Superman would reach light speed in nearly an instant and exceed it to get to Thanos before Thanos can make a significant movement.
Not to mention its completely fail, since they start 166 times further apart than 3 meters.