Thanos vs Superman

Started by zeel399 pages

Originally posted by -Pr-
really? i don't know about that.

how would you determine that the blasts could one shot standard superman, though?

supes is not going to be one shotted by a thanos blast, supes ability to take energy attacks are insane. But i still cant see supes winning under any circumstances.

I think most people are just trying o combat hia8s inane comments with equally inane comments just to balance out the insanity...

Yes superman can hurt thanos.. But not to the same degree he does most others... And in the recent revamp thanos is walking through people. He disintegrated drax in a single blast... Gone poof.. And draxs is up there with hulk.. :-/

Does Thanos win? Most likely.

Does he do it easily? Short of battle field removal that's a no, and anyone who says otherwise is being dishonest and doesn't know shit about Superman. Clark would give him one hell of a fight and will most definitely hold his own hand to hand. Just like Thor has.

Originally posted by darthgoober
so off for people to think that Hercules or Thor would be completely ineffective against him h2h?

It would be off since we've seen Thor engage Thanos in hand to hand, and his been far from ineffective.

Originally posted by -Pr-
really? i don't know about that.

how would you determine that the blasts could one shot standard superman, though?


Don't know about what?

Well we'd see him just the way we saw Odin's blast one shot Surfer.

Originally posted by darthgoober
Don't know about what?

Well we'd see him just the way we saw Odin's blast one shot Surfer.

whether it's close to abc logic or not.

but that's odin. and surfer. neither of those is thanos or superman.

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Does Thanos win? Most likely.

Does he do it easily? Short of battle field removal that's a no, and anyone who says otherwise is being dishonest and doesn't know shit about Superman. Clark would give him one hell of a fight and will most definitely hold his own hand to hand. Just like Thor has.

It would be off since we've seen Thor engage Thanos in hand to hand, and his been far from ineffective.

thor count = 99995

Originally posted by -Pr-
whether it's close to abc logic or not.

but that's odin. and surfer. neither of those is thanos or superman.


pr we ALL use ABC logic on the forum when we're talking about people who've never fought. ABC logic is only a problem when there's a logical fallicy involved. We don't know Doomsday is stronger than the Thing because he has better lifting feats, we know he's stronger than Thing because we know Supes is stronger than Thing and Doomsday is stronger than Supes.

Yeah and Surfer's durability is easily comparible to Supes. You don't really seem to be getting the example here so I'll go into a little more detail in the scenereo....

Supes and character X(we'll call him the Goobonian after yours truely because I'm that big an ego maniac) are going to take on some uber baddie(lets say a particularly powerful version of Amazo). As they approach Amazo, Supes gets one shotted by a casual generic blast(just as Surfer did by Odin) while the Goobonian withstands numerous blasts and engaged the uber Amazo just as Thanos engaged Odin. Now lets also take into consideration that at some point the Goobonian also took physical shots from sundipped Superman with a smile. Would it be unreasonable for someone to think that Herculese wouldn't be able to do much(if anything) to the guy h2h?

Originally posted by darthgoober
pr we ALL use ABC logic on the forum when we're talking about people who've never fought. ABC logic is only a problem when there's a logical fallicy involved. We don't know Doomsday is stronger than the Thing because he has better lifting feats, we know he's stronger than Thing because we know Supes is stronger than Thing and Doomsday is stronger than Supes.

Yeah and Surfer's durability is easily comparible to Supes. You don't really seem to be getting the example here so I'll go into a little more detail in the scenereo....

Supes and character X(we'll call him the Goobonian after yours truely because I'm that big an ego maniac) are going to take on some uber baddie(lets say a particularly powerful version of Amazo). As they approach Amazo, Supes gets one shotted by a casual generic blast(just as Surfer did by Odin) while the Goobonian withstands numerous blasts and engaged the uber Amazo just as Thanos engaged Odin. Now lets also take into consideration that at some point the Goobonian also took physical shots from sundipped Superman with a smile. Would it be unreasonable for someone to think that Herculese wouldn't be able to do much(if anything) to the guy h2h?

i did get what you mean. i just don't agree, and didn't want to end up writing paragraphs about it. your example is fine, though.

also, from what i've seen of the thanos vs odin fight, odin came across (at least to me) as his superior.

Originally posted by -Pr-
i did get what you mean. i just don't agree, and didn't want to end up writing paragraphs about it. your example is fine, though.

also, from what i've seen of the thanos vs odin fight, odin came across (at least to me) as his superior.


Oh you're free to disagree, I was just pointing out how and why someone might think that Supes would be unable to harm Thanos cause you said...
Originally posted by -Pr-
I'm always amazed by people saying Superman can't hurt, or would barely hurt Thanos, considering that arguably Superman's most powerful weapon is his physical strength, which in even weaker forms has allowed him to take on actual angels, gods, demons and to move celestial objects.

Not to mention punching power that even while being absorbed could still be felt miles away.

Not saying he'd win, but saying he's incapable of actually physically matching or competing with someone like Thanos seems to me to be either just bias, hate, or misinformation.

If my example with the Goobonian went down, I'm pretty sure you'd agree that DC fans would be saying the same kind of thing about Thor being able to hurt him.

And I'm in total agreement on Thanos/Odin. I in no way meant to imply that they were fighting evenly...

Originally posted by darthgoober
pr we ALL use ABC logic on the forum when we're talking about people who've never fought. ABC logic is only a problem when there's a logical fallicy involved. We don't know Doomsday is stronger than the Thing because he has better lifting feats, we know he's stronger than Thing because we know Supes is stronger than Thing and Doomsday is stronger than Supes.

Yeah and Surfer's durability is easily comparible to Supes. You don't really seem to be getting the example here so I'll go into a little more detail in the scenereo....

Supes and character X(we'll call him the Goobonian after yours truely because I'm that big an ego maniac) are going to take on some uber baddie(lets say a particularly powerful version of Amazo). As they approach Amazo, Supes gets one shotted by a casual generic blast(just as Surfer did by Odin) while the Goobonian withstands numerous blasts and engaged the uber Amazo just as Thanos engaged Odin. Now lets also take into consideration that at some point the Goobonian also took physical shots from sundipped Superman with a smile. Would it be unreasonable for someone to think that Herculese wouldn't be able to do much(if anything) to the guy h2h?

Good post darth and I didn't think of it like this.

😬

Originally posted by psycho gundam
😬

What's that supposed to mean? 😄

Originally posted by darthgoober
They're probably think that because of Thanos taking physical shots from an amped Thor with a smile, or the whole thing where he was taking blasts from Odin after the Allfather one shotted Surfer(and if Surfer went down to a single one of those blasts, Supes most likely would too).
Thanos had chance to recoup. He simply was enjoying the fight as to why he was smiling (not because the blows didn't have any effect). He was bleeding for crying out loud, that alone proves he was getting rocked. Thor wasn't proven to more than twice amped than his normal self. Also Thor was hitting him with jabs and quick hits and not mighty slams and such. Energy blast durability is totally different than physical blunt force durability.
So surviving a blast doesn't mean you can not be koed by a punch.

Thanos wins hes just far too tough.

Originally posted by h1a8
Thanos had chance to recoup. He simply was enjoying the fight as to why he was smiling (not because the blows didn't have any effect). He was bleeding for crying out loud, that alone proves he was getting rocked. Thor wasn't proven to more than twice amped than his normal self. Also Thor was hitting him with jabs and quick hits and not mighty slams and such. [b]Energy blast durability is totally different than physical blunt force durability.
So surviving a blast doesn't mean you can not be koed by a punch. [/B]
He took physical shots from tyrant just fine.

Originally posted by h1a8
Thanos had chance to recoup. He simply was enjoying the fight as to why he was smiling (not because the blows didn't have any effect). He was bleeding for crying out loud, that alone proves he was getting rocked. Thor wasn't proven to more than twice amped than his normal self. Also Thor was hitting him with jabs and quick hits and not mighty slams and such. [b]Energy blast durability is totally different than physical blunt force durability.
So surviving a blast doesn't mean you can not be koed by a punch. [/B]
Still waiting for you too back your mouth up in the other thread with regards to Thor not being amped at all, and Thanos taking harder hits/energy blasts that create more force than a punch.

Originally posted by h1a8
Thanos had chance to recoup. He simply was enjoying the fight as to why he was smiling (not because the blows didn't have any effect). He was bleeding for crying out loud, that alone proves he was getting rocked. Thor wasn't proven to more than twice amped than his normal self. Also Thor was hitting him with jabs and quick hits and not mighty slams and such. [b]Energy blast durability is totally different than physical blunt force durability.
So surviving a blast doesn't mean you can not be koed by a punch. [/B]

What are you talking about... before thor even received the gem he was in warrior madness state. That state alone puts him at 10 times his original strength. Then he stayed in that state and received the power gem to amp his warrior madness state even further.

Those were not regular thor blows thanos received... one of those blows should outright "kill" superman.

Why exactly are people still responding to H1A8's posts?

I dunno, its beyond me.....lol.

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Does Thanos win? Most likely.

Does he do it easily? Short of battle field removal that's a no, and anyone who says otherwise is being dishonest and doesn't know shit about Superman. Clark would give him one hell of a fight and will most definitely hold his own hand to hand. Just like Thor has.

It would be off since we've seen Thor engage Thanos in hand to hand, and his been far from ineffective.

Except for the part where he can completely stomp both of them in H2h.
Originally posted by h1a8
Thanos had chance to recoup. He simply was enjoying the fight as to why he was smiling (not because the blows didn't have any effect). He was bleeding for crying out loud, that alone proves he was getting rocked. Thor wasn't proven to more than twice amped than his normal self. Also Thor was hitting him with jabs and quick hits and not mighty slams and such. [b]Energy blast durability is totally different than physical blunt force durability.
So surviving a blast doesn't mean you can not be koed by a punch. [/B]
1: He was cut by glass
2: Yes he was being hit like that not quick jabs.
Originally posted by Omega Vision
Why exactly are people still responding to H1A8's posts?
Because I don't like putting people on ignore.