Revenge of the sith v Empire strikes back

which one is the best ?? for me it has to be The Empire strikes Back . ROTS is too flashy with lots of CGI 🙂

I consider ESB to be better movie. It is classic in every sense and has a great story. Revelation part in this movie also added more to its story.

Vader was shown to be a powerful figure in this movie and Lucas enhanced his image in a great manner in this movie.

ROTS is also good but its story is not very well done.

RotS, easily, for me at least. After seeing the PT, the OT sucked ass imo, given I already knew the story before ever watching it, and the terrible fightscenes.

I disagree. Star Wars is more than fight scenes. Don't blame the 70's choreography for that. The OT is the epitome of an epic trilogy. It couldn't have been written better, and the acting didn't blow as much as the first 3. However I loved Ian Mcdermaid in the 1st 3, he is by far the best actor in Star Wars.

Originally posted by Sexyback
RotS, easily, for me at least. After seeing the PT, the OT sucked ass imo, given I already knew the story before ever watching it, and the terrible fightscenes.

some fil afficinado would say movies shouldn;t have so much action but i argee wit you

rots i must say its got more action and it basically tell the whole story. it tells us were chewie was from it tells us why yoda went to degobah etc esb is cool tho

As a Star Wars kid who grew up during the original three (my dad took me to see ANH and ESB in the theatres), I have to go with ESB over ROTS. Looking back, the fight scenes of the originals don't compare to the later ones. Still, the lightsabers and this awesome giant dude in a black suit stirred the imaginations of countless viewers. ESB took the Star Wars saga to a level that has yet to be reached. EP3 is a great movie (despite the sorry acting, though Palpatine was played nicely), and better book, but it doesn't quite touch ESB. I did, however, think that it's second best of all the SW movies.

I like Rots better then ESB, and quite frankly the diolouge in the OT is just as cheesy and lame as that in the PT.

"I love you!"

"I know."

Lucas tried tooooo hard to make Han the sexy rougish character.

The entire PT lacked the soul of the OT. The only thing the PT had over the OT was action and flashiness.

Both trilogies had their cheesy and corny lines, albeit the the PT had far more of them. In comparison to the OT, the PT had dreadful acting and dialogue, with the exception of Ian McDiarmid.

I love how the teenage generations and down prefer the action packed flashiness of the cheese encrusted PT.

And I love how the older generations over gorify the OT just because it's older.

We don't gorify it, there's barely any gore at all.

I'm black AND mexican. Cut me some slack when it comes to grammar.

Lol.

Yeah, the casting director for the first three movies pretty much sucked. Natalie did well in the first two movies. But her lines in RotS sucked, big time.

Ian was the only consistent actor; and he did his job well (except for his facial expressions and dialogue during his whole Mace scenes).

Im offended nobody has given credit to Mr Lee. I personally felt that he gave the best performance, despite his minimal lines given by GL.

Well, no offense to Dooku, but he was mostly a bi*ch in the movies, he was a lot cooler in the EU. The only suave line he gave IMO was "Your swords, please. We don't want to make a mess in front of the Chancellor."

Originally posted by Blaxican
I like Rots better then ESB, and quite frankly the diolouge in the OT is just as cheesy and lame as that in the PT.

"I love you!"

"I know."

Lucas tried tooooo hard to make Han the sexy rougish character.

Actually, that was all Harrison Ford, because Lucas didn't like him saying it back, and they couldn't get it right. Ford just went with it, that came out, and, it was very Han.

Anyway, ESB is a better movie.
Although, I agree with Rampant, Christopher Lee did a great job. He was good, and so was Ian, but, the acting just wasn't as consistant in the PT, and it didn't have the same feel. Although, they're meant to be very different. ROTS has a sense of finality to it (ending the PT trilogy), even though, really, it's just the beginning. ESB leaves you wanting more. It has everything a good movie needs, making it the perfect Star Wars movie. Good acting, great twists, cool characters, and a helluva cliff hanger.

ESB ftw.

Originally posted by Blaxican
Well, no offense to Dooku, but he was mostly a bi*ch in the movies, he was a lot cooler in the EU. The only suave line he gave IMO was "Your swords, please. We don't want to make a mess in front of the Chancellor."

Hmmmm, I think GL f*cked up good and proper with Dooku. He had alot of potential but I feel it was wasted.

Although I also love the line "It may be difficult to secure your release". Brilliant.

Of course you think Lee was the best actor in the saga...he could of said, "I want your poop, Master." and you'd love it. But to think he out shined everyone in the saga is ludicrous. Alec Guiness, Harrison Ford, Ian Mcdiarmid, even Yoda pulled better lines, and he was basically done by a voice actor/puppeteer. He was good, but the best...no way. ❌

Dont blame Mr Lee for the poor lines given to him. I think he did a superb job with what was given to him - which in all honesty wasnt much. GL had a great character and a great actor to play him, yet he only served a very minor role. It was hardly worth having in the first place. A huge waste if you ask me.

thats exactly what I'm saying...if we ask you! lol. I'm saying you'll think he's the best no matter what. But look at it this way...he was in two of the biggest trilogies made, and played a minor character in both...doesn't that say something? He's good, but not that great. I will say he brought some sophistication (and martinis) to the world of Sith lords.