Originally posted by The Sith'ari
Sexy, I'm not alone in saying that all you do is troll and attack other people's arguments without offering your own, now please, quit being annoying.
No no, you are alone indeed. Not to mention you're already first in the race for the biggest dumbass to ever come to this forum. Stop embarassing yourself by arguing against facts and throwing in ZERO arguments. You were a funny joke before, now it's just sad.
Originally posted by Gideon
No, not in this context. This statement was made during the AotC visual guide - Sidious had not completed his plans for domination and had not executed them completely. They were in their infancy. Not everything as far as "greatness" or "power" are ambiguous, Sith'ari. Especially when a similar statement would be "the greatest swordsman of the age" directly refers to skill and/or power. This statement about Palpatine involves the same thing.If you disagree, you will need to offer proof.
Bad analogy. Obviously 'the greatest swordmaster' is pretty clearly in respect to the swordmaster's combat prowess, that's pretty much all their is to being a swordmaster; combat, but 'the greatest evil master to ever use sith magic' doesn't quite have the same effect.
Originally posted by The Sith'ari
Bad analogy. Obviously 'the greatest swordmaster' is pretty clearly in respect to the swordmaster's combat prowess, that's pretty much all their is to being a swordmaster; combat, but 'the greatest evil master to ever use sith magic' doesn't quite have the same effect.
No. It is an effective analogy.
As I said before, "greatness" in terms of accomplishments does not apply yet. Palpatine had not conquered the galaxy or destroyed the Republic and the Jedi at the time.
As I told you before, Sith'ari. If you disagree, offer proof. Or are you lacking it and simply attempting to refute mine?
Originally posted by Darth Sexy
No no, you are alone indeed. Not to mention you're already first in the race for the biggest dumbass to ever come to this forum. Stop embarassing yourself by arguing against facts and throwing in ZERO arguments. You were a funny joke before, now it's just sad.
I recall Glentract noticing it too. Lightsnake pointed it out as well.
Also, pointing out how something isn't a fact isn't arguing against facts, dumbass.
And I throw in zero arguments? I'm the one person who has been effectively arguing against Sidious. Oh, and who was it that proved that Bane pulled a moon out of orbit? Was it me? Oh yeah, that's right. Now please Sexy, name one original argument you have come up with.
Originally posted by The Sith'ari
That's really not my logic...
Seriously Kadesh, go back to Thailand.
LOL need i repeat im not from thailand? How bout you go back to preschool to actually learn how to read and unserstand a sentence when some one writes it down?
Obviously you dont go to school, you dont learn to understand sentences and you make shit of you own "Freedon nadd is teh chosen one!" That proves your a clown
Originally posted by The Sith'ariJust because I get in an argument with someone and we engage in name calling, doesn't mean I'm a troll, but thanks clown. Glentract is a nobody who gets his arguments destroyed because he gets them from EOD members, so he complains. YOU on the other hand have been embarassed, humiliated, made fun of, etc, by virtually everybody that's active on this forum, hence being the forum clown.
I recall Glentract noticing it too. Lightsnake pointed it out as well.
Also, pointing out how something isn't a fact isn't arguing against facts, dumbass.
And I throw in zero arguments? I'm the one person who has been effectively arguing against Sidious. Oh, and who was it that proved that Bane pulled a moon out of orbit? Was it me? Oh yeah, that's right. Now please Sexy, name one original argument you have come up with. [/B]
http://www.swtimeline.ru/?comics=126&page=164
That one, Sith'ari, speaks of Palpatine wishing to "restore his line of clones".
http://www.swtimeline.ru/?comics=126&page=165
That one, Sith'ari is where Palpatine's physician says that a set of clones from a strong Jedi bloodline will be required.
I'll try to find some more of when Palpatine himself declares his intent.
Originally posted by Gideon
No. It is an effective analogy.
No it's not. There's nothing more to being a swordmaster than your combat prowess, it's pretty conclusive. However, being called the greatest evil master to ever use sith magic doesn't have the same effect.
As I said before, "greatness" in terms of accomplishments does not apply yet. Palpatine had not conquered the galaxy or destroyed the Republic and the Jedi at the time.
You're implying that Palpatine hadn't achieved anything, which is wrong. Palpatine had already achieved quite a lot. Think about it real hard, if you still don't get it, I'll tell you. Here's a hint:
Spoiler:
He was able to sit on Yoda's lap in the jedi council meetings!
[/b]As I told you before, Sith'ari. If you disagree, offer proof. Or are you lacking it and simply attempting to refute mine? [/B]
Your argument isn't flawless Gideon, I've quite clearly explained why.
No it's not. There's nothing more to being a swordmaster than your combat prowess, it's pretty conclusive. However, being called the greatest evil master to ever use sith magic doesn't have the same effect.
"The greatest master of evil ever to use Sith power."
Get it right.
And, no, the analogy is effective. Especially when one takes into consideration that Palpatine's plan did not come into effect nor was it accomplished at the time that that quote was made.
You're implying that Palpatine hadn't achieved anything, which is wrong. Palpatine had already achieved quite a lot. Think about it real hard, if you still don't get it, I'll tell you. Here's a hint:Spoiler:
He was able to sit on Yoda's lap in the jedi council meetings!
Lmao.
a.) Being able to have a conversation with Yoda and the Jedi without them being any the wiser in regards to his Sith heritage is impressive. However, if that is the case, then you are saying his ability to do that puts him on a pedestal in accomplishments above every other Sith - including Bane and Revan.
I'd think very hard about that.
b.) No. Palpatine hadn't exterminated the Jedi Order yet or destroyed an ancient Republic. He did not achieve the goals of the Sith at that time. His ability to cloak himself in the Force is nice, but at that time, he was not "greater" than any other Sith.
Your argument isn't flawless Gideon, I've quite clearly explained why.
No. You have not.
I won't repeat myself to you again, and further commentary on this topic will simply be ignored. If you disagree, provide proof. Simply attempting to point out the flaws in mine (and then failing) is not proof in itself.
Think hard. Think closely.