The difference(s) b/t SATAN & LUCIFER

Started by Symmetric Chaos5 pages

Originally posted by FeceMan
This thread confuses me.

Satan is a reptile monster?

What.

Umm . . . yeah where have you been? (he's also from mars and doing genetic experiments on people in area 51)

I'm going to go with...

Lucifer, a fallen angel, is the actual name of Satan, whereas "Satan" is merely a title.

Either can be seen as a title

Lucifer Bringer of Light
Satan Accuser

the difference is do you think the devil ia a lightbulb or an attorney

Originally posted by FeceMan
I'm going to go with...

Lucifer, a fallen angel, is the actual name of Satan, whereas "Satan" is merely a title.


Well, Lucifer isn't the name of Satan too begin with...

Correct........Satan was a title that was instituted during the "Jewish wars" as mentioned by Josephus..his works and volumes.. ... and this was the same time that the authors of the NT were written...Satan only means deceiver or one against another................Lucifer has nothing to do with this..........

Josephus wrote after the disciples and Paul. So that doesn't quite work. Besides that, Genesis strongly indicates that the serpent was actually a fallen angel of light which would make him befitting of the description in Isaiah. But since you study the Hebrew you know this.

I have a book called A Dictionary of Angels, written by Gustave Dore, and it says that Lucifer was misinterpreted to be Satan after reading Isiah 14:12, which says "How art thou fallen from Heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning." This actually refers to Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon. I think Satan and Lucifer are both considered fallen angels. Just a thought.

Originally posted by Nellinator
Josephus wrote after the disciples and Paul. So that doesn't quite work. Besides that, Genesis strongly indicates that the serpent was actually a fallen angel of light which would make him befitting of the description in Isaiah. But since you study the Hebrew you know this.

Nothing of the sort was implied in the original Genesis.

True though the church try to tie the certain scriptures together...Like the serpent with is only more a metaphor, the morning star which was Venus, the king of Tier (sp), and Satan which is just the human flesh. Making the serpent = Lucifer = Satan.

* Satan is not human flesh... 😉

Then you believe Satan is a individual?

* a former angel... and angels are spirits (Hebrews 1:13-14)... and spirits have no flesh and bones (Luke 24:39)... 😉

Originally posted by King Kandy
Nothing of the sort was implied in the original Genesis.
Only because you do not know Hebrew.

Hebrew is quite the romantic language

I used to love it when my ex boyfreind would flirt with me in Hebrew

Originally posted by Lord Urizen
Hebrew is quite the romantic language

I used to love it when my ex boyfreind would flirt with me in Hebrew

He brew would be your cup of tea. 😆

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
He brew would be your cup of tea. 😆

😆

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
He brew would be your cup of tea. 😆
😂

😆

Originally posted by debbiejo
Correct........Satan was a title that was instituted during the "Jewish wars" as mentioned by Josephus..his works and volumes.. ... and this was the same time that the authors of the NT were written...Satan only means deceiver or one against another................Lucifer has nothing to do with this..........

OMG, this sounds like the apology of Lucifer. 😕

Originally posted by Nellinator
😂

That's not funny, I'm part Jewish you know, way back in the gene pool.

But, I can see enjoying a cup of coffee when He brews with Yah-whos....

gotta keep the name of god away from you yokels...

(it's all in good fun folks, sorry if I offended anyone closer to the bloodline).