Originally posted by Regret
It has been theorized that the extreme heat provides a higher state of physiological arousal, and that this at times leads to a form of aggression similar to the concept of "pain elicited aggression". This concept I believe is improperly using the term "pain" in its label, a more apt description should be "arousal induced aggression". Also, a similar concept is the excitation transfer theory, again improperly described.
Apperantly so.
That however leaves a gap as to the progress of Egyptians for example, who also lived in the rather hot part of world (although I am not sure at the climate differance)
Originally posted by Grand_Moff_Gav
I absolutely love how perfectly controversial you are... 😱
Why thank you.
I just stated what I heard about. I didn't imply it is gospel truth, just a theory.
I despise lazy, ignorant people, who like to hop on collective stupidity train, and bleet on ''safe truths'' for which they know no consiqeunce will befall them.
As far as Islam and controversy goes - I don't believe its controvertail, at all.
Just because some Muslims and all dhimmis deny the truth of Islam does not make it a controversy at all in my eyes.
Only a few years ago Sheikh Baaz in Saudi Arabia issued a fatwa that any one who said the Earth is round is Kafir. Obviously this did not go very far but he started a controversy. Do you doubt the shape of the Earth because someone started contraversy. Of course you don't. You look at the facts.
Intelligent people are not affected by controversies. They look at the facts and are not swayed by hearsays. Feeble-minded people become confused and do not know which way to turn. These people switch off and avoid the issue altogether, because for them, making a decision is not an easy task.
Alternatively, they join in a choir of other like minded people and sing along to whatever they think people wanna hear.