BOTS Bane versus ROTS Anakin and ROTS Obi Wan

Originally posted by allfg
Ok, I just read that, and it was kinda vague. Well when Exar first broke Vodo's staff, it was because he used two sabers simultaneously, and the second time, because Vodo's staff had already been broken, it wasn't as string as before, and Exar may well have struck it in its weak spot (the point where it had broken before).

Lol, and he missed the spot all the other times in their fight? I wouldn't think so, it's big. I think it is pretty clear that he used much more power in the end, and the staff broke because of that.

There isn't much adebate...Vodo's saber was supposedly stronger than a saber...Exar swung without forced to break it....and he he swung with enough force to cleave Mandalorian metal

Originally posted by kamikz
Lol, and he missed the spot all the other times in their fight?

Clearly, otherwise it just doesn't makes sense and goes against science.

I wouldn't think so, it's big.

Perhaps Vodod defended the weak spot extremely well.

I think it is pretty clear that he used much more power in the end, and the staff broke because of that.

Well that goes against science. I think it's safer to take the alternative that actually makes sense...

And LS, what Mandalorian metal? Where abouts was this?

Defended it? With what? His hands? He holds both ends of the staff to parry almost every single time, basically, Kun cannot strike anywhere else than in the middle. It is quite obvious that Kun uses more power in the last strike than in the others.

Also, he broke it in the first place, a thing which is supposed to be more powerful than a saber. He used two, and smacked all he could, same as above except he used one...

Firstm coupla issues of TOTJ: DLOTS.

Originally posted by allfg
Yeah, that's great, you're still a loser TD.

Kadesh, go back to Thailand, you wannabee Michael Jackson pedophile b1tch.

Reported! 😱

I wonder how fast Noobaris will be back after this ban..

Originally posted by allfg

Kadesh, go back to Thailand, you wannabee Michael Jackson pedophile b1tch. [/B]

By the way, at least people gave me credit for impersenating MJ in my hometown, i at least can sing, i can do the moon walk, but what can you do?

i know! You love poledancing and lap dancing you gay s.o.b and bane was your inspiration,

i got your PM by the way, telling me you sock and cause trouble here because you need super magnifying glass to see your own pen!s cuz its so damm small only superman can see it. Poor kid you shoud not have gone for a sex change operation and further you shouldnt have told me about it, tsk tsk tsk

Originally posted by allfg
[b]WRONG!!

A lightsaber is weightless; it can't generate impact power, and its only true power is its cutting power. Quite frankly, repeatedly bashing Bane's orbalisks with a piece of string would do a better job at wearing them away than a lightsaber could. [/B]

WRONG!!

virtually impervious to lightsabers means that a lightsaber CAN get through. Rules of grammar dictate written rules of physics.

Subjekt, a lightsaber is weightless, so how can it cause kinetic damage? Then again, I'm not surprised that you don't get this, ever since your wookiepedia argument I haven't really taken you seriously. Though I'm sure you're gonna reply with the JT insult that you've said like a gazillion times: here's a hint *it wasn't funny the first time*

If sabers cant do kinetic impact then djem so is useless since thats whats it is based on. You defy the laws of logic nebaris

Only when up against another lightsaber Kadesh. Fact is, a weightless object can't produce kinetic damage, you can't put force into your attacks.

well you do have a point..

Thats BS, the person swinging the actual object creates kinetic force behind the attacks, while its harder to generate, and not as powerful as something that is weighted already, you can still put force behind your attacks.

Bullshit. A lightsaber is weightless, you can't generate kinetic damage with something which has no weight; no force can be applied into it.

Except...that's exactly what happens

Apparently the technology allows it to be used as a solid object. Don't ask "how" on this one...

Originally posted by allfg
Bullshit. A lightsaber is weightless, you can't generate kinetic damage with something which has no weight; no force can be applied into it.

Your a tool, the hilt has weight, which is what they're swinging around. I dont know if you've seen the movies but thats attached to the bottem of the blade, they're not just swinging around beams of weightless light. friggin n00b.

You're a moron (calling someone a tool only shows people that you're lame, btw), the weight of the hilt is irrelevant seeing as you're not actually hitting you opponent with it, you dumbass. You seem to be confusing kinetic energy with kinetic damage; go back to school.

Why, exactly, then, do we have evidence of force and strenth being a factor?