BOTS Bane versus ROTS Anakin and ROTS Obi Wan

I wasn't arguing that you can't swing a lightsaber blade quicker with more strength, if that's how what I was saying came off across, then that wasn't my intention. All I was saying is that how quickly you swing the blade has no relation on the damage the lightsaber causes on impact because the blade is weightless, and therefor can't cause any damage in that way; you can't channel speed and force into a weightless blade to inflict kinetic damage.

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
Noobaris. There IS a hilt on a lightsaber, you do know that right? Now unless you want to argue that the hilt is weightless, your point is moot.

Read the post above^. What you're hitting your opponents with: the blade itself, is weightless. It's only power lies in burning through solid material, however if a material is resistant to the cutting power of a lightsaber, it's pretty much ineffective in wearing the material away.

And AGAIN: We've seen Exar Kun disprove that theory....and lightsabers have different possible settings

And AGAIN: We've seen Exar Kun disprove that theory....

Provide a direct link to where he disproves that, and I'll concede.

and lightsabers have different possible settings

Intensity levels... Nothing to do with damage caused by impact.

go to SWtimeline.com an find the part when Exar destroys the wall of mando iron...it's in TOTJ: DLOTS

Originally posted by allfg
I wasn't arguing that you can't swing a lightsaber blade quicker with more strength, if that's how what I was saying came off across, then that wasn't my intention. All I was saying is that how quickly you swing the blade has no relation on the damage the lightsaber causes on impact because the blade is weightless, and therefor can't cause any damage in that way; you can't channel speed and force into a weightless blade to inflict kinetic damage.

Since you fail to comprehend what I said, I'm going to post this again.

Originally posted by ((The_Anomaly))
No, the blade does not have mass, but it doesn't need to, its attached to something that DOES have mass. Therefore the entire weapon itself has mass...Just not very much. Nevertheless, you can therefore put significant force behind a lightsaber blow depending on how fast and hard you swing it. Can you put as much force behind it as say a Sith sword? No you cant, because Sith swords are heavy swords, but you can still put force behind a lightsaber attack. The entire weapons itself isn't weightless.

I understand perfectly, and I'm guessing you know that, but since you know that I'm right and you're wrong, and don't want to admit it, but don't want to back away either, you're choosing to act as if I'm missing your point, without any explanation as to how I'm doing that might I add. Now really, hypothetically speaking, if I did miss your point the first time, what makes you so sure that I'll get it the second? I think an explanation as to how I missed your point, and what your point really is, is in order, ((The Anomaly))

Originally posted by Lightsnake
go to SWtimeline.com an find the part when Exar destroys the wall of mando iron...it's in TOTJ: DLOTS

OK, I just read from here onwards, and I'm not seeing your point Lightsnake, could you elaborate?

something you don't get about that?

Clearly. Elaborate.

You don't even need the comcis to prove that. Luke cuts through a wall of Cortosis with his lightsaber in the Thrawn duology. That's a perfectly valid example of a lightsaber cutting through something lightsaber resistant.

Exar swings once....Mando iron undented.

Exar swings with more power. He cuts through

You don't even need the comcis to prove that. Luke cuts through a wall of Cortosis with his lightsaber in the Thrawn duology. That's a perfectly valid example of a lightsaber cutting through something lightsaber resistant.

Exact book, passage and page number?

Originally posted by Lightsnake
Exar swings once....Mando iron undented.

On a low lightsaber intensity.

Exar swings with more power. He cuts through

What page? I couldn't find that anywhere? And even then, the intensity levels explains why.

The pictures prove you wrong already.

OK, for some reason my internet wasn't displaying the bottom part of that page earlier, but still, there's a perfectly valid explanation: the lightsaber's intensity level. That has nothing to do with the kinetic damage a lightsaber can cause.

Originally posted by allfg
Exact book, passage and page number?

I'll PM it to you I guess wyhen I get it. It's at my Mom's house.

We also see the Jedi on Saleucami cut through cortosis weaponry

Originally posted by allfg
I understand perfectly, and I'm guessing you know that, but since you know that I'm right and you're wrong, and don't want to admit it, but don't want to back away either, you're choosing to act as if I'm missing your point, without any explanation as to how I'm doing that might I add. Now really, hypothetically speaking, if I did miss your point the first time, what makes you so sure that I'll get it the second? I think an explanation as to how I missed your point, and what your point really is, is in order, ((The Anomaly))

Reading the verbal spunk that comes out of your mouth makes me want to give up on humanity.

juz ignore him. Hes like cancer who will never go away FFS why didnt they ban this fella yet,