The Core
AmStar 14 Manager
Obviously I'm not done. Make this quick, my girlfriend will be home in less than an hour.
Originally posted by EPIIIBITES
Yeah exactly...bully. Rich!
You are a bully. Just not a good one.
Basically the reason we're here is because of your track records. This is what you get for not being able to hold your sharp tongues simply because my opinions frustrate you, or for making unprovoked attacks on people (which I’ve realized now extends far beyond this thread)
No, it's because you can't leave good enough alone. You made weak comparisons, stupid analogies, and were proven wrong. That's where it should have ended, but you're so convinced that you're right, dispite having everything you say debunked, you won't give up. You're like some one off Rocky Balboa. You're the one provoking people. "Clueless". "Boy". "Out of your element". "Can't accept it".
As far as extending beyond this thread, it only goes as far as your incorrect, baseless, or unjustified remarks take you. If you're refering where I suggested you were wrong about the "3 minute marketable" Chemical Brothers tracks, that was nothing more than correcting you. Not out of spite, just as an FYI.
So I'm just sticking it to you that’s all, and exposing all the ridiculous points you continue make.
..and in denial-speak, by "points", you mean "facts".
And as far as facts go…people don’t need facts to realize you guys are pretty much clueless…your OUTRAGEOUS comments show that on their own.
When our comments are backed by facts, they speak for themselves. Anyone who disallows fact so that they can still be "right" is as ignorant as you.
Even so, I continually school you with bringing forth quotes from someone like a Rolling Stone music critique, who (like me) DOES know how to make valid comparisons…or a genius, legendary musician, who (like I’ve done) can recognize that his band (Pink Floyd) are in fact creatively spent…something you don’t want to and can’t accept with the dinosaur artists you’re still clinging on to.
Rolling Stone is a magazine of opinions and nothing will change that. Pink Floyd being creatively spent is a variable, which can be proven wrong. But, like I said, Syd Barrett is a little on the worm food side. I'll give you that, that HE himself is spent. Quite literally, in fact.
But these examples go WAY over your heads
..and nothing goes over your head? Probably not, considering it's firmly lodged in your ass. Har bloody har, right?
The only facts you cite in return are something like “album sales” or “concerts”…which mean nothing!
I noticed you omitted the Prince references with which were used to debunk your theory on him still being marketable. Those being "Grammy nominations" and "No. 1 debut album on Billboard". Maybe we're getting somewhere afterall?
Spelling all this out for you really kinda hurts…but…I’ll suffer the pain in hopes you’ll one day understand.
Right back at cha, champ.