Originally posted by EPIIIBITES
I had quoted about Roger Waters!! Waters! Sid was done eons ago! WT?My point is Waters knew his band was becoming irrelevant in the 80s, and left as a result. I too can accept that they (my favourite band) became irrelevant as well...but I don't think you guys want to or are able to do that with the bands you like because for SOME REASON you'll get defensive or whatever (where again, there's no reason you should...you like them and that's that).
I never said Rolling Stone was fact...I said my opinions aren't as idiotic as you claim them to be because other, more "well respected" voices can back me up.
And I wasn't referring to your 5 min comment. I was referring to some of you who seem to be notorious for slagging people out of nowhere all across these boards.
And really, if comments like "boy" and "can't accept it" hurt you then I will stop using them...I don't try to be offensive and use language of that sort, but I do take little jabs at people as everyone on these boards does...it makes it exciting. And you're an angel, right?
But I honestly do think I am more informed with this stuff than you guys are...that's my opinion...deal with it.
I don't care about Pink Floyd. I think they're grossly overrated, but won't ignore their contributions to music. That said, one man's opinion doesn't necessarily reflect the opinions of the collective. Nor does what one member feel at one time rule out a second wind, a recreation. Even bands that were ahead of their time evolved as they went along, constantly setting the standard for bands to follow. The Beatles, Led Zeppelin, Pink Floyd..their evolutions were quite evident. It's not impossible to take a break, recapture the spark, and give it another go, making inventive music again.
The voices of Rolling Stone are only "well respected" by people who rely on critics to tell them what they should think of music. Any parallels that can be drawn between a critic's taste and that of a listener is purely coincidental. There can be one reviewer that shares a lot of your interests, and you can latch on to them, but what happens when you think they're "wrong"? I don't listen to critics, because most critics A) haven't discovered the music I like, B) are quick to pass it off, or C) don't think it's worth mentioning in the first place. Music's a passionate, personal avenue. Not one that can have a writer sum up your feelings for you on some paper.
You don't make jabs at people that have tried their best to keep their cool, but can't help help it because of the way you're presenting an debate, with such conviction and disconcern for other people's opinions.
You can call whoever you want to call a "boy", but I'm a man.
Factually.
Originally posted by The Core
You don't make jabs at people that have tried their best to keep their cool, but can't help help it because of the way you're presenting an debate, with such conviction and disconcern for other people's opinions.
Can't argue the last part of that paragraph...given what you guys have brought to the table which I think is laughable.
But as far as the "trying to keep your cool" stuff goes...nice try. There's examples left, right and centre (not with you as much) of unprovoked attacks on people using rude language and not being the least bit "patient". I just call that stuff out when I see it...ESPECIALLY when it comes from someone who doesn't know what they're talking about...
...as I KNOW I do. If that boldness pisses you off to the point of swearing at me, then too bad. In the least, you should appreciate my honesty, and not hold me to being something I 'm not which is "Oh, everybody's right! Da tee da! You like what you like, and I'll like what I like and they're all just dandy".
PUKE!
What I DON'T do (like some of you) is come from out of nowhere and tell a poster they're bands are s#$* (even though I'd argue you could be right). That's so pointless. But I will react to someone doing that to others...especially if they don't know what's up themselves. And I'll do so by elaborating on it.
You folks bully. I school. Big difference.
Originally posted by BackFire
HAHAHA OMG A TYPO, QUICK EXPLOIT EXPLOIT EXPLOIT CUZ I HAVE NOTHING RELEVANT TO SAY LOL NO ONE MAKES TYPOS HAHAHAHAHHA OWNED ROFL SCHOOLED NOT BULLIED!
What are you talking about? Read the posts bud.
It is this lot that has used the typos thing with me all throughout the threads...this is the very first time I've used it. One...because it was more than just typos but wrong words, two...because it was just so bad, and three...because he was making a reference to a child.
Couldn't be more hilarious actually!
GOOD ONE Backfire!!!
Are you people TOTALLY useless at stumping me on anying? Gets funnier and more amazing by the day.
Originally posted by EPIIIBITES
Haa haa ha!!!What are you talking about? Read the posts bud.
It is this lot that has used the typos thing with me all throughout the threads...this is the very first time I've used it. One...because it was more than just typos but wrong words, two...because it was just so bad, and three...because he was making a reference to a child.
Couldn't be more hilarious actually!
GOOD ONE Backfire!!!
Are you people TOTALLY useless at stumping me on anying? Gets funnier and more amazing by the day.
Hey, that's cute. "They did it first, so I did it back to them".
All your post needs is a "Neener neener neeeeeener" part and a section where you ask teacher to go to the potty and the 3rd grade atmosphere will be complete.
And no, it wasn't more than just typos, it was just a typo. Sometimes when you type fast, you'll type out a word that is similar to another word, and your finger will just, out of habbit, hit the wrong key to make it that other word, still nothing more than a typo.
Yes, he was making reference to a child, which you retort by childishly mocking a typo and then using childlike mentality to defend it. You sure showed him.
Boy, it's amazing that no one takes anything you say seriously around here, with such scathing wit and responses as "lol you made a typo, hahaha" and "he did it first".
Both are obviously the attributes of a great debater, well done.
Why do you pretend...seriously?
He said "I can not verify I'm debating at a child."
I suggested he made 2 word errors, "not" and "at"...and I corrected him because of the irony of the context...not because he simply made a word error (which is what I've had to face by these clowns in the past).
See...I've just explained myself and proven another one of your lame attempts to show me wrong as false. Why don't you be a man and accept you've just been schooled?
All your last post is, is just a desperate attempt to say "no, YOU'RE dumb!" without bringing anything new to the table...simply because you don't like me and you find safety in numbers.
Go away, insect.
Originally posted by EPIIIBITES
Did you mean to say...I can "now" verify I'm debating "with" a child?😆
Yes, I meant to say "now".
No, I didn't mean to say "with", because that would imply two people are involved in the debate, which is not the case in this instance, so;
"I can now verify I am debating at (a) child"
..and this "grammar pwnage" of yours only soldifies it.
Originally posted by EPIIIBITESIt is this lot that has used the typos thing with me all throughout the threads..
Where? Show me? Hell, show us. Prove you're not delusional.
..and as an aside, watch your tone with Backfire. That little tag that says "Moderator" isn't there to get chicks. He could do us all a favor in the blink of an eye and..
Wait for it....
Musical analogy forthcoming....
I'm using a "faded away" band...
Put you on a...
"Permanent Vacation"
LOLLERSKATES! AIROSMITH! I mean AEROSMYTH...
...arrowsmith...?
fuck it..
You explaied why you thought it was erronious, never questioned that, just why you bothered to even bring it up to begin with, seemed awfully childish of you. Still does. Especially since they did it to you first, apparently you think two wrongs make a right. Nice.
Why wouldn't I like you? I've never even encountered you before.
And no, calling you out on making a stupid derivative post isn't desperate, just honest. If anything, it was desperate of you to try and exploit a typo in a lazy attempt to get the upper hand in a debate that you are clearly losing.
Right...having "at" in there didn't make sense as well...so I suggested you might have meant something else. That's all.
I'm not gonna actually go back and pick out the 2-3 times you guys have pathetically corrected me on a word to somehow show supremacy during an argument.
This is a lame discussion.
Back to music if anything.
Originally posted by EPIIIBITES
Right...having "at" in there didn't make sense...so I suggested you might have said something else. That's all.I'm not gonna actually go back and pick out the 2-3 times you guys have pathetically corrected me on a word to somehow show supremacy during an argument.
This is a lame discussion.
Back to music if anything.
Suggested. "Suggested"?
No, you told me I made two errors. One was intentional, the other, not. Last I checked, that's a High School diploma setting next to my degree in communications on my mantle.
By all means..I'll give you the number to both schools so you can tell them they should let you "re-teach" me to NOT be human and NOT make mistakes.