Test your own Morality

Originally posted by Bardock42
Oh, you can tell us the story alright. But really, it is not true. He got refused twice by an Austrian art school. That's a fact. Rest you said didn't happen.

Originally posted by JacopeX
Actually, my teacher told me an interesting story matter of fact. She said that a co worker dropped down all of a sudden one day because of the deaths of the holocaust. He was a Jew by the way. And the man said that he won the Award or something, (Sorry I forgot that par). He also said that if Hitler would of won it, he would've been a great artist. and you just came up with Hitler and his interests in art giving my story more probability of being true and I know it is!

Oh Jesus ****ing Mc Jew, I wish PVS or KharmDog would be around to see that. Dude, you just made my day, week and month.

Originally posted by Bardock42
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Oh Jesus ****ing Mc Jew, I wish PVS or KharmDog would be around to see that. Dude, you just made my day, week and month.

Example: UFO's, Ghost, 9/11(The Gov. did not do it!), Ect.

Originally posted by JacopeX
I pity how you dont even take the chance to even think about it. Now you will go and make a joke of it. this is why we will never get to the truth now days because the truth will always be denied by a bunch of jackasses.

Example: UFO's, Ghost, 9/11(The Gov. did not do it!), Ect.

Dude.

Come on. Okay, what evidence do you have? Actual evidence. Provide me with it.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Dude.

Come on. Okay, what evidence do you have? Actual evidence. Provide me with it.

Was I suppose to take notes? Am I suppose to bring a video camera every time I go to school to record stories my Teachers say?

Or do you want evidence of the story because if thats the case then no.

Originally posted by JacopeX
Evidence? How the hell can give you evidence if im the one reporting?

Was I suppose to take notes? Am I suppose to bring a video camera every time I go to school to record stories my Teachers say?

Or do you want evidence of the story because if thats the case then no.

Well...obviously I want evidence of the story. If what you say is true, then there must be some evidence for it. There is for the application to an Art School, where is for the contest?

Originally posted by Bardock42
Well...obviously I want evidence of the story. If what you say is true, then there must be some evidence for it. There is for the application to an Art School, where is for the contest?

Originally posted by BackFire
As far as the second paragraph, intent is the important factor there. All of the above mentioned made terrible decisions and yes, a life is a life, but Washington didn't go out with the intent to murder every single black person just because he didn't like them. Roosevelt wasn't attempting to slaughter every asian person he saw as if they were a scourge set on the planet, their intentions were all much different from Hitlers. They made bad decisions that caused some death in the process, though it wasn't their intention. Murder was Hitler's intention, he intended to kill jews - fact.

American Indians

Originally posted by Soleran
American Indians

Originally posted by Marxman
Yes, that was bad, but are we really going to compare the two atrocities to see which was a worse atrocity? What will that accomplish?

If intent is a "moral" marker then you be the judge.

Originally posted by Soleran
American Indians

They were killed because of turf disputes; not because an American president made a 'final solution' to round up all the 'Injuns' and and gas them all.

Originally posted by Soleran
If intent is a "moral" marker then you be the judge.

Intent is always a moral marker.

Jacope, the Reason Hitler was rejected was because even though he painted beautiful landscapes he never painted people. Because of his refusal and lack of ability to illustrate the human face and the human form, he was not accepted.

That's kind of scary if you think about it.....Hitler never painted people. What does that say about his psyche ?

Originally posted by Lord Urizen
Jacope, the Reason Hitler was rejected was because even though he painted beautiful landscapes he never painted people. Because of his refusal and lack of ability to illustrate the human face and the human form, he was not accepted.

That's kind of scary if you think about it.....Hitler never painted people. What does that say about his psyche ?

...nothing?

Maybe that he thought he was not good at painting people? But jsut maybe.

Anyways, your "test"....how does it "test" my morality?

And by the way, Jacope, Hitler did not lose an award to a Jew...where the f*ck did you get that from ?

Adolf Hitler was rejected from an Austrian Art school, because of his lack of people illustrations in his portfolio. Many of the board members of that school happened to be Jewish...that was all.

Originally posted by Bardock42
...nothing?

Maybe that he thought he was not good at painting people? But jsut maybe.

Anyways, your "test"....how does it "test" my morality?

It forces you to decide what you value more....the life of an innocent infant or the lives of millions of innocent people. I don't see how you can't put two and two together.

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
If the primus is you will stop the holocaust by killing the infant Hitler, then I would kill the baby, without any hesitation. The life of one child is insignificant when compared with the lives of millions, plus he will simply reincarnate in a new life.

Thank you, this is basically what I was looking for.

You have guts, because even if killing baby Hitler had a 100% guarantee that the Holocaust would never happen, I don't think I could do it. I'm way too sensitive and p*ssy to kill a baby. 😮

Originally posted by Shakyamunison
However, how can you be sure that the death of one person can change history?

I can't..but that's not the point. 😬

As Adam Poe stated, under the premise that killing Hitler would result in the prevention of the Holocaust, would you try to prevent it yes or no....

And btw, if you beleive in the Chaos Theory, then killing one person can totally change history...since according to the chaos theory, one tiny action has echoes of consequences that lead to an infinite array of other consequences.

If you want to insist that Hitler alone is not entirely responsible for the Holocaust, then fine, but that's going off topic.

But then again, this is the Philosophy forum, and i guess going off topic here and there is inevitable

Originally posted by Lord Urizen
It forces you to decide what you value more....the life of an innocent infant or the lives of millions of innocent people. I don't see how you can't put two and two together.

And what is moral now and what not and to what degree?

Originally posted by Lord Urizen

As Adam Poe stated, under the premise that killing Hitler would result in the prevention of the Holocaust, would you try to prevent it yes or no....

If the only result was that the Holocaust would be stopped then I probably would do it.

Originally posted by Lord Urizen
And btw, if you beleive in the Chaos Theory, then killing one person can totally change history...since according to the chaos theory, one tiny action has echoes of consequences that lead to an infinite array of other consequences.

Exactly why I said I wouldn't kill him.

Originally posted by Lord Urizen
And by the way, Jacope, Hitler did not lose an award to a Jew...where the f*ck did you get that from ?

Adolf Hitler was rejected from an Austrian Art school, because of his lack of people illustrations in his portfolio. Many of the board members of that school happened to be Jewish...that was all.

Originally posted by Bardock42
And what is moral now and what not and to what degree?

Why are you asking me ?

This thread is intended to get you to question yourself. I see you haven't posted your answer yet.