Akuma vs Ayane

Started by Darkstorm Zero16 pages

I was directing that at Remulous, sorry for the misconception. 😮

Originally posted by Tha C-Master
I'm trying to remember the last thread where he actually HAD his sword. 😖

Has been a while huh?
Originally posted by Superboy Prime
Moron.

The pressence would take any video game character amped infinity and will still erase them from existence without minimal effort.

Just so you know Mr. Clueless the pressence is DC comics supreme being.


Woah man. Calm down lol. Who were you talking to anyway?

Originally posted by Darkstorm Zero
All I said was, that the Satsui No Hadou is itself an Evil force, but does that make the person/people wielding it evil? No, of course it doesn't.
I can agree with that. I just thought that it would be more murderous(deadly) then evil seeings how I thought The Satsui No Hadou meant A Surge Of Intent To Kill!

The very act of killing without remorse is by it's very nature,an evil act, ask anyone you like

I think that one is open to opinions. If the person knows they're getting into a possible death match and acknowledge that, then it's not evil. Like when Gen tried to get Gouki to kill him.

Gen was seeking that death match to avoid death from his illness, there's a big difference from that to killing your master and brother to prove a point.

Gouki's master and brother knew they were in a life and death battle, it's not like he snuck up on them and killed him, in fact Gotetsu was over joyed at the fact that he was killed by 1 of his students. In Gouki's eyes, killing is the only way to successfully win a battle. Can it really be evil if he does not recognize it as a bad deed.

Oops, wrong thread.

Originally posted by Remulous
Gouki's master and brother knew they were in a life and death battle, it's not like he snuck up on them and killed him, in fact Gotetsu was over joyed at the fact that he was killed by 1 of his students. In Gouki's eyes, killing is the only way to successfully win a battle. Can it really be evil if he does not recognize it as a bad deed.
It is true that many characters have different aspects of morality. Gouki isn't good by any means, but he's not going to let the world sit in danger and blow up either, hence the comet feat. He inadvertently does good things.

He doesn't like to have his training interfered with though. 😛

Originally posted by Darkstorm Zero

However, I am more convinced now than I was before that Ryu's weapons are plot devices...

Only the true dragon blade is a plot device, which only has one property: It allows Ryu to stand up to the Dark Dragon Blade. That's not much to be honest.

Originally posted by Darkstorm Zero

Not to mention that the majority of the threads relating to Hayabusa are DOA versions ONLY... so why the DDB and TDS areeven getting brought up is beyond me...

Because there isn't really a difference in the continuity really, ryu weilds the Dragon Blade in DOA 4 and the events of Ninja Gaiden are mentioned in his profile. Also, ryu weilding the Dark Dragon Blade is not canon I believe.

😮‍💨

Originally posted by Tha C-Master
It is true that many characters have different aspects of morality. Gouki isn't good by any means, but he's not going to let the world sit in danger and blow up either, hence the comet feat. He inadvertently does good things.

He doesn't like to have his training interfered with though. 😛

Yeah, he's far from good but he aint bad either, as you said, he's more of an anti hero.
Originally posted by Emperor Ashtar
Only the true dragon blade is a plot device, which only has one property: It allows Ryu to stand up to the Dark Dragon Blade. That's not much to be honest.

Because there isn't really a difference in the continuity really, ryu weilds the Dragon Blade in DOA 4 and the events of Ninja Gaiden are mentioned in his profile. Also, ryu weilding the Dark Dragon Blade is not canon I believe.

😮‍💨

Well , well, well...lok at who's returned.

Those flamewars have caught his interest...

Originally posted by Tha C-Master
Those flamewars have caught his interest...

Actually, they kept me away and I'm surprised to see you posting inn this forum again?

To me, the bottom line is, an unarmed Hayabusa can't beat Gouki or Rugal. Unarmed, he can not beat Ryu(SF), Terry or Sagat.

Bty, Ayane will not survive against Gouki.

Originally posted by Remulous
[COLOR=green] To me, the bottom line is, an unarmed Hayabusa can't beat Gouki or Rugal. Unarmed, he can not beat Ryu(SF), Terry or Sagat.

Any particular reason why you feel this way besides the fact you like those characteres? Hayabusa has demonstrated IMO more skill than any of the characters you've just listed.So, why can't he win Remulous?

Originally posted by Emperor Ashtar
Actually, they kept me away and I'm surprised to see you posting inn this forum again?
They? Whom? Btw I can make sigs now, and I recall you wanting one.

On and off, I was requested to come and deal with a fanboy or ten... I'm only loosely commited being semi-retired and super busy like I am.

Originally posted by Emperor Ashtar
Any particular reason why you feel this way? Hayabusa has demonstrated IMO more skill than any of the characters you've just listed.So, why can't he win Remulous?
The fact that he can't sink islands, split mountains, lift several ton boulders that are stacked atop each other, beat Krauser with out his sword, or take on most of a KOF cast with out his sword. Haybusa is great with his sword but in H2H, he's gonna lose.

Everyone knows this.

Originally posted by Tha C-Master
They? Whom?

By "They" I'm referring to "Team Ninja".

Originally posted by Remulous
The fact that he can't sink islands, split mountains, lift several ton boulders that are stacked atop each other

Neither can Gen, Oro, and Gouken and they've all either stalemated gouki or in gouken's case scored a desicive win against him. Gouki having more destructive power than hayabusa doesn't say much except that he can mess stuff up.

Originally posted by Remulous

, beat Krauser with out his sword, or take on most of a KOF cast with out his sword. Haybusa is great with his sword but in H2H, he's gonna lose..

What does the kof cast have to do with this, and who can solo the KOF cast in the first place? They are like the strongest cast in fighting game history.

Originally posted by Remulous

Everyone knows this.

"Knows" so, it's a fact now? Since when are conclusions in any versus bouts involving characters that will most likely never encounter each other and are from completely different universes a irrefutable fact?

Only one man in the history of KOF has ever legitimately soloed the the KOF cast. KOF 95'. Omega Rugal.

Originally posted by Emperor Ashtar

Neither can Gen, Oro, and Gouken and they've all either stalemated gouki or in gouken's case scored a desicive win against him. Gouki having more destructive power than hayabusa doesn't say much except that he can mess stuff up.

Oro most likely can, Gen does not need to, he can kill people with touches, no one in DOA can do that. If Gouken wanted to he probaly could.

Originally posted by Emperor Ashtar

What does the kof cast have to do with this, and who can solo the KOF cast in the first place? They are like the strongest cast in fighting game history.
Rugal did it and the main reason why the KOF cast is so strong is because there are like over 70 characters and there are a shit laod of bosses.

Originally posted by Emperor Ashtar
"Knows" so, it's a fact now? Since when are conclusions in any versus bouts involving characters that will most likely never encounter each other and are from completely different universes a irrefutable fact?
C'mon Ashtar, let's not be so literal. Most will agree that Hayabusa will loose in H2H Even the fans, which they already have.