NJO Luke Runs The Gauntlet

Started by Darth Sexy7 pages

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
Yoda managed to deflect Sidious's Lightning because his defensive abilities were strong.

so?

Resorting to insults now. I am done with you. You might be a good debator but you don't have manners.

I would do the same thing if I was faced with stupidity, consider it a blessing. You're getting taught a lesson in logic 101.

In case of Luke, their was only one target so obviously Sidious would not need to fill an entire room when targeting him.

Sidious was toying with him, get over it.

Sora might be stronger then Luke in some aspects but not in all aspects. Luke's training was complete by ROTJ period and he defeated Vader in combat. He also tolerated Sidious's Lightning to a great extent. I would say that Luke > Sora even by ROTS period.

Except "complete" for Luke isn't the same thing as "complete" for any of the Old Republic Jedi. I guess you forgot that Luke had a ghost of Obiwan and a dying Yoda training him.

No my fault. You can't say that Luke had weak defensive abilities in ROTJ.

Yes you can, where would he learn how to defend against force lightning? YOu have to crawl before you can walk.

And Yoda was very old when he fought Sidious. His body was not as strong as that of Luke.

Irrelevant point. The force boosts bodily functions and everything else, and ROTS Yoda was much much more powerful than ROTJ Luke.

Advent! ROTJ was developed in 1970's. Technology was not very advanced at that time. ROTJ Luke was not weak in comparison to PT comrades but he was not on par with them and I will admit this. Remember that AOTC and ROTS movies were developed usng highly advanced technology. So characters in these movies looked far more impressive.

Wonderful, when all logic fails, lets blame technology. Your argument is over.

Darth Vader's Saber skills were indeed not on par with that ROTS Vader. But he was not a bad duelist even as a half-machine. Expanded Universe based tales of Darth Vader show this.

Irrelevant

Vader could defeat Luke if he had wanted to but not in Saber Combat because he was not as agile as Luke was. And when Luke got angry, it was end of Vader. Courtesy: ROTJ movie.

Yes, if he wanted to. Thanks for being the authority on Vader's mind, Noobaris JR.

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
So?

You obviously have no clue to what I am saying and just separating my statements here and there, which is not good.

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
Wtf do you not understand about what Advent told you? As a jedi he has more ways of stopping or avoiding the lightning, but him being a jedi doesn't make him naturally more immune to lightning than a human.

Advent said this: Undoubtedly, a Jedi or Sith would have a greater defense against such an attack, and thereby have more resistance

Shall I say: pwned?

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
Yea, ferocious warriors that were no match for Jedi, good job proving power and providing more irrelevant nonsense.

Those ferocious warriors had advantage of numbers. A single Jedi pwned them and even 30 people could not do this. And that Jedi was Anakin who was not at all ordinary in any sense.

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
That your argument has been defeated and you want to waste more text with irrelevant garbage.

Not yet. Obi-Wan fought against Dooku and lost. But Anakin fought Dooku and lasted longer then Obi-Wan. What clue did this gave to you? Anakin was stronger.

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
I guess me and Advent have the same logical thought process. Or you're just incapable of thinking.

You are incapable of understanding my points.

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
Revan's attack on the rakatans did not kill them instantly. Furthermore Sidious' lightning could wtfpwn anybody if he was serious. Moot point.

How do you know? Revan launched a Force attack and surviving Rakatans bowed before him. It was an instant defeat.

And Sidious was serious when he started zapping Luke. Remember this term "So be it! Jedi".

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
Are you really this incompetent?

Lack of argument from your part.

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
Except he was NOT adept to force knowledge other than basic TK and force choke.

How do you know? Many Jedi mostly rely on TK abilities or Force Push in fights.

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
You're not making any points.

Again trying to twist my point. Good try.

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
I've doubted your debating abilities since day 1. You haven't failed me yet.

I doubted your debating abilities when you could not understand simple points made by me. Good try.

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
You need to quit while you're behind.

Why? you control my actions now?

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
[B]so?

So you obviously did not get my point again. You are indeed pathetic.

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
I would do the same thing if I was faced with stupidity, consider it a blessing. You're getting taught a lesson in logic 101.

I don't insult people who have less knowledge then me.

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
Sidious was toying with him, get over it.

How do you know? Sidious was applying great intensity in his Lightning so that he could maximize pain for Luke and Luke's screams were clear indication of this.

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
Except "complete" for Luke isn't the same thing as "complete" for any of the Old Republic Jedi. I guess you forgot that Luke had a ghost of Obiwan and a dying Yoda training him.

Why? Does the complete word have different meaning for every Jedi now? You obviously have made a bad assertion.

And that dying Yoda lifted a damn heavy small space craft out of a sticky and muddy region. Think before posting something.

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
Yes you can, where would he learn how to defend against force lightning? YOu have to crawl before you can walk.

Yoda taught him something? Didn't he?

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
Irrelevant point. The force boosts bodily functions and everything else, and ROTS Yoda was much much more powerful than ROTJ Luke.

And he managed to counter Sidious's Lightning because he was great at Force Deflecting.

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
Wonderful, when all logic fails, lets blame technology. Your argument is over.

I said that Luke was not on par with ROTS Jedi. Learn to read properly.

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
Irrelevant

That point was mean't for Advent and not you. You stick to your points.

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
Yes, if he wanted to. Thanks for being the authority on Vader's mind, Noobaris JR.

Thanks for being an authority on Sidious's mind.

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
You obviously have no clue to what I am saying and just separating my statements here and there, which is not good.

99% of what you are saying is irrelevant crap, hence the repeated "so".

Advent said this: Undoubtedly, a Jedi or Sith would have a greater defense against such an attack, and thereby have more resistance

Shall I say: pwned?


While you're saying that because the person is a Jedi, he would biologically be able to withstand force attacks as opposed to non force sensitives. That's not what Advent is saying.. Sorry..

Those ferocious warriors had advantage of numbers. A single Jedi pwned them and even 30 people could not do this. And that Jedi was Anakin who was not at all ordinary in any sense.

Baseless and illogical assumptions.

Not yet. Obi-Wan fought against Dooku and lost. But Anakin fought Dooku and lasted longer then Obi-Wan. What clue did this gave to you? Anakin was stronger.

And yet this isn't an Anakin vs. Obiwan thread, so thanks for more irrelevant crap.

You are incapable of understanding my points.

You're not making any relevant points worth understanding.

How do you know? Revan launched a Force attack and surviving Rakatans bowed before him. It was an instant defeat.

No no no you said he instantly killed them with his force attack. Stop contradicting yourself. And stop making shit up with baseless assumptions.

And Sidious was serious when he started zapping Luke. Remember this term "So be it! Jedi".

And then he started laughing as he was torturing Luke. You enjoy arguing against facts?

How do you know? Many Jedi mostly rely on TK abilities or Force Push in fights.

Because Luke spent a limited time on Dagobah before heading off.. Yoda's going to teach him masterful force techniques before teaching him basics?

I doubted your debating abilities when you could not understand simple points made by me. Good try.

Thanks for the "I know you are but what am I comment" nancy, but nobody understands your piss poor arguments.

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
So you obviously did not get my point again. You are indeed pathetic.

Says the one who is looking like a fool because he can't shut up after getting wtfpwned.

I don't insult people who have less knowledge then me.

I doubt anyone here has less knowledge than you except for maybe Noobaris.

How do you know? Sidious was applying great intensity in his Lightning so that he could maximize pain for Luke and Luke's screams were clear indication of this.

For the millionth time, Advent provided you the sources that state that Luke was just being tortured. You look like a fool arguing them.

And that dying Yoda lifted a damn heavy small space craft out of a sticky and muddy region. Think before posting something.

Wonderful, and Luke's last lesson taught was basic TK.. Man he MUST have been uber!

Thanks for being an authority on Sidious's mind. [/B]

Thanks for not conceding an argument you lost 2 pages ago..

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
I have been using the term "powerful bursts of Lightning" more often now. Did you care to check my next post? No.

The bold part of your post is what I have been trying to say for a long time here but nobody checked it.

My logic stands.[/Qupte]
Not when it is directly disproven


Were those Force sensitive trained in Jedi arts or powerful?

My point is that Lightning cannot instantly kill those who are strong in the Force.


they were powerful enough to ressurect Darth Maul.
And we've seen strong Force Users die instantly from FL

[Quote]
Malak's Lightning could do the same as well as it happened on Star Forge. The point is that Force Lightning varies in intensity. I am talking about those Jedi who are strong in the Force. Those Jedi who can't defend themselves from Force Lightning are prone to die quickly but their is always a chance to counter Lightning through Light Saber.


I'm curious...what constitutes 'strong in the Force' to your honestly worthless viewpoint?


Take these three cases in to consideration:

- Dooku shoots Lightning at Anakin. Anakin gets knocked out for a short time and then comes back.

Dooku is not aiming to kill him. Try again

- Sidious shoots Lightning at Yoda. Yoda gets knocked out for a short period and then comes back.

Palpatine is not trying to kill Yoda there. Try again

- Sidious shoots Lightning at Luke. Zapps him several times but Luke still comes back.

Hey, umm...you miss that Palpatine was slowly torturing him and not trying to kill him instantly?

My point is that strong Jedi are not killed instantly by Lightning. And stop telling me to STFU. I can speak where-ever I want and when-ever I want to speak.

And we have the right to tear you down for it


My point is that Lightning attack does not instantly kills a strong Jedi.

Tell that to the several strong Force Users Palpatine killed instantly


Sidious was giving full dosage to Luke. But he did not got pawned.

Lies and foolishness. It is directly stated Palpatie was slowly torturing Luke

Sidious was giving full dosage to Yoda but that resulted in a blast.

Because Yoda is Yoda. Not because Yoda's a Jedi


Are Sora, Anakin AOTC and Yoda ordinary beings? No.

Try to understand the statement before spewing out.


What ARE you trying to say then?


Luke's screams gave what indication to you?

He's in horrible agony? Exactly the intention of Force Lightning?

Did you see that Pic that I have provided here? No.


Yes. You're wrong

Sidious was zapping Luke with Lightning using both of his hands.

So? Number of hands does not mean more on less intensity. DOuble the dosage, double the pain

Here is a PIC for you to see again: http://img64.imageshack.us/img64/8551/zappyl3.jpg

Care to provide me any proof that he was not exerting his utmost power? He was maximizing the pain of Luke by adding more intensity in to his Lightning. This is logic.


Actually, I can: ROTJ novelization and Complete Visual Guide expressely stated Palpatine was holding back to torture Luke slowly before he killed him


You don't have proof either so why ask me a proof. I have posted what I think that have happened. Sidious was applying great intensity in his Lightning to punish Luke as severely as possible. Luke's screams showed this.

He was TORTURING LUKE with Lightning, as is its intention...that does not equal power.


You obviously did not understood my point. I said that Luke was becoming weaker and weaker as Lightning hit him. He was about to die. You don't need to tell me your theories on this.

He was about to die becaue Palpatine decided to torture him to death and nearly did so


And he came back? Didn't he?

Now I know that Sidious's Lightning would have more impact on him but still we can't say that he will be instantly killed by it.


Yes, we can. If Palpatine wanted to kill him from the start, he'd do it


Palpatine wanted him dead in ROTJ. End of story.
He didn't want to kill him quickly. Notice all the taunts throughout? The short zaps? The PAUSES?


Yes! that computes.

A Sith Lord generates Force Lightning using one hand. The intensity is strong. Now at the same time he uses his other hand to generate Force Lightning. This second wave of Force Lightning will combine with that of the First wave of Force Lightning and the instenity will be doubled. See the logic?


It means nothing. Shut up about it


You are just making an assertion that Sidious was not ulitizing his full power on Luke. You don't know this because you are not Lucas. I am not here to out-debate you because I don't need to waste my time on you. You don't have proper manners to stay civil in debates.

Actually, we do know because material has expressly stated it


It was a great display of power. The intensity of his Lightning was causing extreme pain to Luke.

Luke survived because of his strong will and strength in the Force.


He survived because Vader saved him and Palpatine wanted to kill him slowly


Sidious's Lightning was near his greatest. He was maximizing the pain of Luke.
You're a fool. It is specifically stated Palpatine minimized his own abilities there to torture Luke slowly

My point is not yet disproven LS!

Originally posted by Lightsnake
they were powerful enough to ressurect Darth Maul.
And we've seen strong Force Users die instantly from FL

What does there ressurrection capabilities have to do with there strength in the Force? Nothing.

And do mention these powerful Jedi here that have died instantly from Force Lightning.

Originally posted by Lightsnake
I'm curious...what constitutes 'strong in the Force' to your honestly worthless viewpoint?

I mean't those Jedi that are heavily trained, experienced and have good knowledge of Force.

Originally posted by Lightsnake
Dooku is not aiming to kill him. Try again

How do you know?

He used Force Lightning on Anakin which knocked Anakin but he did not died from it.

Originally posted by Lightsnake
Palpatine is not trying to kill Yoda there. Try again

Palpatine is not trying to kill Yoda in that fight? Are you nuts?

OK! he initially wanted to test Yoda's capabilities but as soon as the fight went to senate, palpatine tried his best to kill Yoda. His last lightning attack on Yoda was mean't to kill him. But Yoda countered and it resulted in a blast.

Originally posted by Lightsnake
Hey, umm...you miss that Palpatine was slowly torturing him and not trying to kill him instantly?

And you forgot this term "Now you will be destroyed".

Palpatine was weakening Luke first and then went for the kill after a brief pause.

Originally posted by Lightsnake
And we have the right to tear you down for it

And I have the right to counter back.

Originally posted by Lightsnake
Tell that to the several strong Force Users Palpatine killed instantly

Strong Jedi? Provide me some more details about them and there achievements and also were they on par with Anakin ROTS, Malak, Revan, Yoda and Luke?

Originally posted by Lightsnake
Lies and foolishness. It is directly stated Palpatie was slowly torturing Luke

Provide me the exact quote and link to the source.

Originally posted by Lightsnake
Because Yoda is Yoda. Not because Yoda's a Jedi

What kind of logic is this?

Here is my logic: Because Yoda was a powerful Jedi and knew Force Deflection.

Originally posted by Lightsnake
What ARE you trying to say then?

That comment was not aimed at you. I don't need to give you explanation on this.

Originally posted by Lightsnake
He's in horrible agony? Exactly the intention of Force Lightning?

And he was feeling pain.

Originally posted by Lightsnake
Yes. You're wrong

You have no clue about what you are saying.

Originally posted by Lightsnake
So? Number of hands does not mean more on less intensity. DOuble the dosage, double the pain

Double dosage is done by two hands actually.

Originally posted by Lightsnake
Actually, I can: ROTJ novelization and Complete Visual Guide expressely stated Palpatine was holding back to torture Luke slowly before he killed him

Palpatine was weakening Luke first and then went for the kill after a brief pause.

Originally posted by Lightsnake
He was TORTURING LUKE with Lightning, as is its intention...that does not equal power.

Force Lightning is a Force Power. Try again.

Originally posted by Lightsnake
He was about to die becaue Palpatine decided to torture him to death and nearly did so

Yes! Palpatine wanted to kill Luke.

Originally posted by Lightsnake
Yes, we can. If Palpatine wanted to kill him from the start, he'd do it

Sorry! Palpatine was zapping Luke first to weaken him and when this was accomplished. He again zapped him to eliminate him.

Originally posted by Lightsnake
He didn't want to kill him quickly. Notice all the taunts throughout? The short zaps? The PAUSES?

Or Lightning does not instantly kills a strong Jedi.

Originally posted by Lightsnake
It means nothing. Shut up about it

You STFU. I was not talking to you.

Originally posted by Lightsnake
Actually, we do know because material has expressly stated it

Material does not matters when we have movie to judge from. Sidious was weakening Luke first and when this happened, he struck again to finish him off.

Originally posted by Lightsnake
He survived because Vader saved him and Palpatine wanted to kill him slowly

There is no definite evidence that shows that palpatine wanted to kill Luke slowly. He wanted to kill him and thats it.

Originally posted by Lightsnake
You're a fool. It is specifically stated Palpatine minimized his own abilities there to torture Luke slowly

Show me the quote and link to the source.

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
99% of what you are saying is irrelevant crap, hence the repeated "so".

Since you can't understand what I am saying, it does not means that my points are irrelevant. They are related to one of issues raised in this thread. If you consider them to be irrelevant then don't bother to reply.

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
While you're saying that because the person is a Jedi, he would biologically be able to withstand force attacks as opposed to non force sensitives. That's not what Advent is saying.. Sorry..

Why not ask Advent rather then me that what she mean't with this term?

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
Baseless and illogical assumptions.

Since you don't have any argument then only these kinds of lines can be expected from you.

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
And yet this isn't an Anakin vs. Obiwan thread, so thanks for more irrelevant crap.

It was point regarding Anakin's strength. You obviously have lost your mind because you can't understand a damn thing that I have mentioned here. Why not quit?

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
You're not making any relevant points worth understanding.

Or you don't want to understand my points.

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
No no no you said he instantly killed them with his force attack. Stop contradicting yourself. And stop making shit up with baseless assumptions.

Yes! I said this because it was not at all a long fight. It was a very short fight.

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
And then he started laughing as he was torturing Luke. You enjoy arguing against facts?

What does laughing has to do with his intentions to kill Luke? Of-course he will laugh because he was sure of his victory. People enjoy moment of victories.

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
Because Luke spent a limited time on Dagobah before heading off.. Yoda's going to teach him masterful force techniques before teaching him basics?

Movie never showed us the full details of Luke's training. But it was clear from the comments of Yoda and Vader that Luke's training was complete. Those comments matter more.

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
Thanks for the "I know you are but what am I comment" nancy, but nobody understands your piss poor arguments.

And I don't give a shit about your piss poor arguments.

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
Says the one who is looking like a fool because he can't shut up after getting wtfpwned.

Says the one who sees debates as a matter of win/loss situations.

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
I doubt anyone here has less knowledge than you except for maybe Noobaris.

Then why lower yourself to my level by arguing with me?

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
For the millionth time, Advent provided you the sources that state that Luke was just being tortured. You look like a fool arguing them.

That torture was mean't to weaken and kill Luke.

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
Wonderful, and Luke's last lesson taught was basic TK.. Man he MUST have been uber!

Blame Lucas and not me because he made that movie.

Originally posted by Darth Sexy
Thanks for not conceding an argument you lost 2 pages ago.. [/B]

No arguement has been lost here.

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
My point is not yet disproven LS![/Quotes]
Yes it is. You are not a good debator


What does there ressurrection capabilities have to do with there strength in the Force? Nothing.

Oh, right, RESSURECTING someone with the Dark Side isn't a display of power...
Whatever
[Quote]
And do mention these powerful Jedi here that have died [b]instantly
from Force Lightning.

Rayf Ysanna. Mace Windu


I mean't those Jedi that are heavily trained, experienced and have good knowledge of Force.

Not Luke in ROTJ then


How do you know?

He used Force Lightning on Anakin which knocked Anakin but he did not died from it.


Because Palpatine's plans hinged on Anakin from the start and Dooku knew of this. From the start he wanted to convert Anakin


Palpatine is not trying to kill Yoda in that fight? Are you nuts?

OK! he initially wanted to test Yoda's capabilities but as soon as the fight went to senate, palpatine tried his best to kill Yoda. His last lightning attack on Yoda was mean't to kill him. But Yoda countered and it resulted in a blast.


The initial blast? Palpatine was not trying to kill him.
Later on in the senate chamber? Yoda was BLOCKING it, for one


And you forgot this term "Now you will be destroyed".

No, it was 'if you will not be turned, you will be destroyed.'

Palpatine was weakening Luke first and then went for the kill after a brief pause.

He was torturing him the entire time. He paused a LOT and decided to kill him slowly


And I have the right to counter back.

and you're losing horribly


Strong Jedi? Provide me some more details about them and there achievements and also were they on par with Anakin ROTS, Malak, Revan, Yoda and Luke?

Mace Windu, according to the ROTS novelization was dead almost instantly when Palp's lightning hit him.
Funny that


Provide me the exact quote and link to the source.

Link you to a book? I've provided the sources. The quote goes: something along the lines of slowly and deliberaterly torturing Luke to death.

What kind of logic is this?

Here is my logic: Because Yoda was a powerful Jedi and knew Force Deflection.


Luke didn't


That comment was not aimed at you. I don't need to give you explanation on this.

Mmhmm


And he was feeling pain.

That was the intention


You have no clue about what you are saying.

Oh, shut up. Do you need Lucas to scream it in your ear?


Double dosage is done by two hands actually.

Wrong. Only if the user chooses to


Palpatine was weakening Luke first and then went for the kill after a brief pause.

No. Palpatine was slowly and deliberately torturing Luke.


Force Lightning is a Force Power. Try again.

Umm...Palpatine was not using his most powerful lightning. Otherwise, Luke'd be ash

Yes! Palpatine wanted to kill Luke.

Slowly and horribly. He wanted him to suffer


Sorry! Palpatine was zapping Luke first to weaken him and when this was accomplished. He again zapped him to eliminate him.

Wrong. Palpatine was 'slowly and deliberately' torturing him. Try again


Or Lightning does not instantly kills a strong Jedi.

Hi, Mace! Hi, Rayf! Hi, Prophet Trio!


You STFU. I was not talking to you.

Well, I'm crushing your pathetic argument, so it's no wonder you're avoiding me


Material does not matters when we have movie to judge from. Sidious was weakening Luke first and when this happened, he struck again to finish him off.

No. Explain why Palpatine starts by giving him small zaps, then keeps pausing while taunting him?
Materials>>>>>Your stupid opinion


There is no definite evidence that shows that palpatine wanted to kill Luke slowly. He wanted to kill him and thats it.

Huh, according to the Complete Visual Guide, Palpatine was focusing his hate to make Luke suffer slowly and horribly before his death...


Show me the quote and link to the source. [/B]
All done. You lose.

Originally posted by Lightsnake
Oh, right, RESSURECTING someone with the Dark Side isn't a display of power...
Whatever

Disciples of Ragnos ressurrected Ragnos and does this means that they were very powerful? No.

Ressurrection is related to a Dark Side ritual and not power.

Originally posted by Lightsnake
Rayf Ysanna. Mace Windu

Tell me some details about Ysanna.

And Mace Windu got his hand chopped off and was in pain. Then Sidious blasted him with Lightning but even then Mace stood for a while before he fell out. It was a helpless situation for Mace. Before that Mace was countering Sidious's Lightning. Thus Windu's case is not valid.

Originally posted by Lightsnake
Not Luke in ROTJ then

Luke in ROTJ was not good? Please!

Originally posted by Lightsnake
Because Palpatine's plans hinged on Anakin from the start and Dooku knew of this. From the start he wanted to convert Anakin

And thats why Dooku decided to throw that big crane on Obi-Wan and Anakin to crush them after fighting Yoda in Geonosis? Good try but you failed.

Originally posted by Lightsnake
The initial blast? Palpatine was not trying to kill him.
Later on in the senate chamber? Yoda was BLOCKING it, for one

And Sidious said this to Yoda: "Now you will experience the full power of the Dark Side" before attacking Yoda. That initial Lightning strike was also mean't to do extreme damage to Yoda or even kill him. But Yoda survived.

And because Yoda knew how to block one.

Originally posted by Lightsnake
No, it was 'if you will not be turned, you will be destroyed.'

This was said be Vader. Sidious said what I have mentioned before.

Originally posted by Lightsnake
He was torturing him the entire time. He paused a LOT and decided to kill him slowly

Sidious mean't to kill Luke. And Force Lightning is a form of torture to any living being.

Originally posted by Lightsnake
and you're losing horribly

Not at all.

Originally posted by Lightsnake
Mace Windu, according to the ROTS novelization was dead almost instantly when Palp's lightning hit him.
Funny that

It was said in a different sense. Mace did not died instantly or in 1 second from Sidious's Lightning. Your point is dead.

Originally posted by Lightsnake
Link you to a book? I've provided the sources. The quote goes: something along the lines of slowly and deliberaterly torturing Luke to death.

Quotes can be twisted by some people.

Originally posted by Lightsnake
Luke didn't

That comment was for Yoda and not Luke.

Originally posted by Lightsnake
Mmhmm

Yeah right?

Originally posted by Lightsnake
That was the intention

Pain is not an intention.

Originally posted by Lightsnake
Oh, shut up. Do you need Lucas to scream it in your ear?

Lucas's view will be acceptable.

Originally posted by Lightsnake
Wrong. Only if the user chooses to

I am talking about the case when user chooses to. And double bolts hitting a same object will do more damage to it.

Originally posted by Lightsnake
No. Palpatine was slowly and deliberately torturing Luke.

In your eyes actually.

His torture was mean't to weaken and kill Luke. And the intensity in his Lightning was immense so that Luke would suffer terribly before death.

Originally posted by Lightsnake
Umm...Palpatine was not using his most powerful lightning. Otherwise, Luke'd be ash

How do you know?

His lightning would not be at max but it was near max.

Originally posted by Lightsnake
Slowly and horribly. He wanted him to suffer

And his intention was to weaken and kill.

Originally posted by Lightsnake
Wrong. Palpatine was 'slowly and deliberately' torturing him. Try again

Lightning is a torture for a living being. Palpatine's purpose was to kill Luke and he applied great intensity in his Lightning to kill Luke.

Originally posted by Lightsnake
Hi, Mace! Hi, Rayf! Hi, Prophet Trio!

Mace's case is invalid.

More details are needed for Rayf for me to judge him.

Those Prophets are joke.

Originally posted by Lightsnake
Well, I'm crushing your pathetic argument, so it's no wonder you're avoiding me

Their is no crushing here. Just a debate. Better improve your mentality.

Originally posted by Lightsnake
No. Explain why Palpatine starts by giving him small zaps, then keeps pausing while taunting him?
Materials>>>>>Your stupid opinion

Higher canon source > any material.

Palpatine wanted to kill Luke. He then start shooting Lightning on Luke to give him a taste of terrible pain. Then he started intensifying his Lightning to maxmimze damage on Luke and finally when Luke was weak enough. Sidious said this "now you will be destroyed" and again zapped him but it was still taking long to kill Luke. Try again.

Originally posted by Lightsnake
Huh, according to the Complete Visual Guide, Palpatine was focusing his hate to make Luke suffer slowly and horribly before his death...

Suffer was intensified by adding more power to his Lightning. That statement just shows a different angle of the fight.

Originally posted by Lightsnake
All done. You lose.

Those quotes only provide a different point of view and nothing else.

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
Disciples of Ragnos ressurrected Ragnos and does this means that they were very powerful? No.

There's a difference between using a tool to resurrect somebody and being powerful enough to perform a ritual to bring back somebody.

And Mace Windu got his hand chopped off and was in pain. Then Sidious blasted him with Lightning but even then Mace stood for a while before he fell out. It was a helpless situation for Mace. Before that Mace was countering Sidious's Lightning. Thus Windu's case is not valid.

no

Luke in ROTJ was not good? Please!

He was ok but powerful? No..

And thats why Dooku decided to throw that big crane on Obi-Wan and Anakin to crush them after fighting Yoda in Geonosis? Good try but you failed.

No, your arguments have failed for god knows how many pages now. You posting again and again is embarassing for you.

And Sidious said this to Yoda: "Now you will experience the full power of the Dark Side" before attacking Yoda. That initial Lightning strike was also mean't to do extreme damage to Yoda or even kill him. But Yoda survived.

Is that why Sidious was laughing at Yoda and waiting for him to get up? Clearly he didn't intend to kill him on the first strike, as opposed to his final lightning strike when Yoda absorbed it.

It was said in a different sense. Mace did not died instantly or in 1 second from Sidious's Lightning. Your point is dead.

Except Sidious' lightning in DE instantly killed force sensitives, so your point is dead.

Mace's case is invalid.

wrong

Their is no crushing here. Just a debate. Better improve your mentality.

No, this is a logical pwnage..

Palpatine wanted to kill Luke. He then start shooting Lightning on Luke to give him a taste of terrible pain. Then he started intensifying his Lightning to maxmimze damage on Luke and finally when Luke was weak enough. Sidious said this "now you will be destroyed" and again zapped him but it was still taking long to kill Luke. Try again.

Good god, you're the second idiot to argue against canon.

Your argument is dead but there seems to be a pattern of denial for the people on this forum who are incapable of debating.

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
Disciples of Ragnos ressurrected Ragnos and does this means that they were very powerful? No.

Ressurrection is related to a Dark Side ritual and not power.


Prove up. Rituals still require power.

Oh, and a LOT of power revived Ragnos from the sceptre. Different circumstances


Tell me some details about Ysanna.

He was one of three Jedi who managed to defeat scores of Dark Jedi-the emperor's elites- on their on

And Mace Windu got his hand chopped off and was in pain. Then Sidious blasted him with Lightning but even then Mace stood for a while before he fell out. It was a helpless situation for Mace. Before that Mace was countering Sidious's Lightning. Thus Windu's case is not valid.

Bull. He was countering with his saber. Mace wa sa powerful Jedi who died instantly


Luke in ROTJ was not good? Please!

He was good. Not amazing


And thats why Dooku decided to throw that big crane on Obi-Wan and Anakin to crush them after fighting Yoda in Geonosis? Good try but you failed.

That was to distract Yoda. do you really think Dooku thought Yoda wouldn't stop it?


And Sidious said this to Yoda: "[b]Now you will experience the full power of the Dark Side
" before attacking Yoda. That initial Lightning strike was also mean't to do extreme damage to Yoda or even kill him. But Yoda survived.

He went to hurt him, then. It was not meant to kill Yoda


This was said be Vader. Sidious said what I have mentioned before.

No. Bullshit. "If you will not be turned, you will be destroyed." Is said by Palpatine as well


Sidious mean't to kill Luke. And Force Lightning is a form of torture to any living being.

He meant to kill him, but not immediately, can you not understand this?


Not at all.[/Quote
Advent handed you your ass

[Quote]
It was said in a different sense. Mace did not died instantly or in 1 second from Sidious's Lightning. Your point is dead.


No. Mace died instantly. He was dead before he went out the window

[Quote
Quotes can be twisted by some people. [/Quote]
Translation: They own me


That comment was for Yoda and not Luke.

Yoda knows how to block lightning, unlike Luke then


Yeah right?

Yeah. Right

Pain is not an intention.

Causing pain can sure as hell be an intention.Hello, torture!


Lucas's view will be acceptable.

Then listen to the commentary, or read the novelizations he approved


I am talking about the case when user chooses to. And double bolts hitting a same object will do more damage to it.

Unless the user uses a smaller intensity on purpose.


In your eyes actually.

Factually, actually

His torture was mean't to weaken and kill Luke. And the intensity in his Lightning was immense so that Luke would suffer terribly before death.

There was no need to weaken Luke from the start. Palpatine was just torturing him horribly in rage after Luke denied the Dark Side.


How do you know?

His lightning would not be at max but it was near max.


We've never seen Palpatine use max lightning...when not even trying, he reduced three people to charred bones and killed over a hundred people at once.


And his intention was to weaken and kill.

Actually, it was to torture to death


Lightning is a torture for a living being. Palpatine's purpose was to kill Luke and he applied great intensity in his Lightning to kill Luke.

Don't you think slowly frying someone with FL is torturous? Regardless of the normal torture, cooking Luke alive slowly is torturous


Mace's case is invalid.

"Cuz it owns me!"

More details are needed for Rayf for me to judge him.

Why? You'll just judge it invalid, too

Those Prophets are joke.

Riiight....members of a powerful Sith Cult who ressurected a Sith are jokes. Right.
Oh, another Jedi who died instantly from lightning: Kol Skywalker

Higher canon source > any material.

Palpatine wanted to kill Luke. He then start shooting Lightning on Luke to give him a taste of terrible pain. Then he started intensifying his Lightning to maxmimze damage on Luke and finally when Luke was weak enough. Sidious said this "now you will be destroyed" and again zapped him but it was still taking long to kill Luke. Try again.


Since when was your goddamn interpretation canon over the EU?
Palpatine never said 'now you will be destroyed'. It was taking along time because Palpatine wanted it to take a while


Suffer was intensified by adding more power to his Lightning. That statement just shows a different angle of the fight.

Those quotes only provide a different point of view and nothing else. [/B]


Translation again: "They own me."

Lightsnake!

Mace wasn't instantly killed by sith lightning, you can quite clearly see him standing, screaming in pain for quite a few seconds before he is flung out of the building.

he's standing because he's PINNED there because he's being fried.

Novelization makes it clear that he 'falls forever' when Palpatine's 'hate struck him full on'

LeGenD, do you have some sort of mental defect? I personally enjoy your rather inept understanding of "torture". When one wants to effectively torture someone, one does not use maximum force. That would lead to a quicker death. I mean, really, how stupid would it be to want to put someone through agony and use lethal force? Kind've takes away the point, but you don't seem to get that.

You're outclassed and your points are simply squashed. There is nothing to say that Sidious was then attempting to kill Luke - given that he frequently stopped the lightning assault to gloat to him. And even his declaration of "Now young Skywalker, you will die" isn't going to hold water because we have seen what Sidious has done to people like Yoda (whose Force defense is much more potent than anything RotJ Luke has under his sleeve) and what Count Dooku has done to Anakin. Pouring lightning into a body is going to bring more force and more power than a single blast. And yet Dooku (who is far weaker than Sidious at this point in the Force) was able to knock Anakin unconscious with one blast (and Anakin's Force defense and Force connection are greater than Luke's), and RotS Sidious is much weaker than his RotJ variant.

Sidious reduced three very powerful Sith acolytes to ash with a single blast. You brought up the Disciples of Ragnos, but it is completely different. Firstly, they did not succeed in resurrecting Ragnos, but merely awakening his spirit. Secondly, there were hundreds of those dark Jedi. Thirdly, they had Ragnos's own scepter and Sith arts to use. Now, these acolytes - if they resurrected him - did it by themselves and they numbered only three. Sidious reduced them to charred skeletons with one hand in a short amount of time without any visage of strain or effort.

Then? He fries dozens of Stormtroopers simply because his drink got blasted out of his hand. Lastly? Sidious on his deathbed (means he was on the very last proverbial centimeter of life) was able to kill all of Luke's Jedi accomplices with a single blast of energy, and his physicians and dark side adepts commented that each further use of the Force brought Palpatine closer to death.

His lightning is a mile above any other Sith Lord's, and he was not using his upper limit against Luke. Period.

I should note before posting the following, but LeGenD, you should respond to all the points I've made, I couldn't help, but notice that you skirted several.

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
I have been using the term "powerful bursts of Lightning" more often now. Did you care to check my next post? No.

Was it my obligation to read your later post? Or was the onus on you to properly word your sentences, so as they make reasonable sense when I respond to that post? Oh, wait. That's right. The latter seems to be the more obvious choice here.

Now, it's undeniable that numerous points will be repeated due to the fact that Sexy, and Lightsnake are responding to your "rebuttals" (I don't even think they deserve that title, but I'm cutting you slack), so deal with it, or like I've been saying, shut the hell up.

The bold part of your post is what I have been trying to say for a long time here but nobody checked it.

No, it's not. Seeing as I cared enough to check your next post (ha!), you're taking what I said, and making an inaccurate interpretation.

They aren't "naturally" more resistant, however, due to the fact that they can use the Force

My logic stands.

And no, it doesn't.

Were those Force sensitive trained in Jedi arts or powerful?

They were Force sensitive Sith acolytes, ergo trained in the Darkside. They were powerful enough to raise Darth Maul from the dead, or create a new -- one that gave Darth Vader an immense amount of trouble, so much that he had to commit seppuku to get the win.

My point is that Lightning cannot instantly kill those who are strong in the Force.

Depending upon the circumstances, yes it can. So, you are, as usual, wrong. Darth Sidious' lightning could annihilate someone like Master T'Chooka, for example (who was described as "strong in the Force" by the omniscient narrator), ergo whatever passes for logic in your world fails due to that.

We can deduce that the lightning Sidious can generate would be able to take down numerous foes. Even just using the Sora Bulq example, if Dooku - with one hand (therefore, less full power) - could cause a Jedi master like Sora Bulq to be rendered unconscious, then imagine what Darth Sidious, who we've seen reduce three acolytes to ash, kill a battalion of Stormtroopers (and the circumstances here imply that it wasn't at its apex of intensity), and knock the indisputably, most powerful Jedi up to RotS, Yoda unconscious for an amount of time, could do.

Indeed, I wouldn't want to be on the receiving end of that attack. Your assumption is flawed, and all you've been doing is stating this and that, but not backing it up with evidence - whether by means of using logic, or actual source material. I, on the other hand, have done this. As well, so have Sexy, and Lightsnake.

Malak's Lightning could do the same as well as it happened on Star Forge.

What are you referring to? Where does he reduce someone to "bone and ash"? Even if he does, how the hell does that correlate to my point? Oh? What's that? It doesn't? I figured as much.

The point is that Force Lightning varies in intensity.

Yes, depending upon the wielder of the lightning themselves. If they want to torture, by all means, the lightning isn't going to be aimed to kill.

I think we've established this, however, as our prime example is Sidious, if he applied his full strength into the attack, a sub par Force user would, as I said, be dead.

I am talking about those Jedi who are strong in the Force. Those Jedi who can't defend themselves from Force Lightning are prone to die quickly but their is always a chance to counter Lightning through Light Saber.

Oh my Buddha, see above.

Dooku shoots Lightning at Anakin. Anakin gets knocked out for a short time and then comes back.

"Short time"? No, it was a long time, if we are including the fact that the blast clearly wasn't intended to kill, but only remove him from the picture he wasn't even knocked out, he was writhing in pain, and trying to recuperate after getting fried. It was a

Anyways, proof that Count Dooku was aiming to kill Anakin at that specific point? Or, at the least, poured his utmost power into the attack? Well, that's actually already been disproved by the fact he only used one hand.

Sidious shoots Lightning at Yoda. Yoda gets knocked out for a short period and then comes back.

Proof that Sidious was aiming to kill Yoda at that specific point? Or, at the least, poured his utmost power into the attack? Well, the former (and thus latter) is already unanswerable on your part, because we see Sidious try to flee after being Force pushed. If he wanted him dead right then, and there, he would've blasted him continuously, or elaborate on his last attack.

Sidious shoots Lightning at Luke. Zapps him several times but Luke still comes back.

Proof that Sidious was aiming to kill Luke at that specific point? Or, at the least, poured his utmost power into the attack? Well, you're currently being dismantled by three of the best debaters here, and have another one of the greatest currently here telling you you've been annihilated. So, for the time being, we'll just let this discussion continue (even though the anti-LeGenD side has proved up). It's rather entertaining.

My point is that strong Jedi are not killed instantly by Lightning.

The thing is, you have no proof of the affirmative (that they were applying their full power, or trying to kill them). Skepticism is generally the default position, thus I'm telling you to prove up on that, which you've yet to do, and seem to refuse to do.

And stop telling me to STFU. I can speak where-ever I want and when-ever I want to speak.

I can tell you to "shut the hell up" (learn2read) wherever, and whenever I want, bizatch. If you don't like it, go cry to your mother, and get off the board.

And, again, I'm only telling you to "shut the hell up", because you won't prove up. So, prove up or shut the hell up.

My point is that Lightning attack does not instantly kills a strong Jedi.

Except your point isn't backed up by viable evidence. You've provided three occasions where a "powerful Force user" was blasted, but not that they were applying their highest limit.

Sidious was giving full dosage to Luke. But he did not got pawned.

Prove up, or shut the hell up. Just because you say it, doesn't make it so, Limbaugh.

Sidious was giving full dosage to Yoda but that resulted in a blast.

Prove up, or shut the hell up. Just because you say it, doesn't make it so, Limbaugh.

Still have doubts then it is your perception and not mine.

See above, addressed, and taken down.

Oh, so what you say is magically constituted by fact. Well, Sieg Heil to you, my friend! Please, child. You still haven't provided proof of the following:

1. That anyone in any situation you named was using their utmost power.
2. That you can see.
3. That you're competent.

Listen, I'm going to explain to you things in a demeaning manner from now on:

You. Have. Not. Backed. Up. Your. Assumptions.

Therefore, that leads me to believe

That. You. Have. No. Proof.

And thusly, are

Talking. Out. Of. Your. Ass.

Now, ditto what I've been saying: prove that Palpatine administered his apex of power into the attack during RotJ. If you don't do so, then I'd advise you not to respond, because it's only looks worse for your case.

Are Sora, Anakin AOTC and Yoda ordinary beings? No.

Was that what I asked for? No. Was the comment relevant to what we were discussing, and what I was responding to? No.

I was stating that we've seen Sora Bulq knocked out, same case with Yoda, and we've seen AotC Anakin being put out of combat for a time. They all correlate to my point that if Sidious were to utilize his maximal amount of power, then Luke would've - at the very least - been knocked out.

He wasn't, therefore logic would dictate that he (Sidious) didn't.

Luke's screams gave what indication to you? Do you need an Hubble Telescope to judge the impact of Lightning on a person?

It was sarcasm, for one, and not meant to be taken as serious as you're doing. It was more of a "wow, irrelevant, who gives a flying ****"-esque deal.

Anyways, to be on point (since every minuscule detail needs to be explained to you), Luke's scream gave indication that he was being tortured, however, they didn't give indication of what you're entire premise is based around.

Did you see that Pic that I have provided here? No.

So, now, you know what I did, and didn't do? Funny, see below, because I'll address the point with something I've already written regarding the situation.

Sidious was zapping Luke with Lightning using both of his hands.

Originally posted by Advent
Irrelevant. So, because he uses two hands, he must've been using a greater intensity of lightning than he could generate with one hand? No, that doesn't compute.

I can swing a baseball bat with two hands, and not use as much force as I could with one hand, if I chose to. Try again, chump change. You really cannot out debate me, so my best advice would be stop while your behind.

QED.

Care to provide me any proof that he was not exerting his utmost power?

I find it comedic at best that you would even claim you know what "logic" is. You're asking me to prove a negative. The onus is on you to provide evidence of the affirmative.

That's logic.

He was maximizing the pain of Luke by adding more intensity in to his Lightning. This is logic.

I don't recall ever denying that he wasn't, but that's not the real crux of this discussion. Try actually reviewing what I write, instead of presenting a claim as if I argued against it, or believed otherwise.

What we're talking about is the culmination of his power at that point focused into the repeated, and continuous blasts.

You don't have proof either so why ask me a proof.

So, you admit that you have nothing that could provide testament to what you're arguing. Good to know. Now, the problem here is: 1) it's not my job to prove the negative (that he didn't use all of his power), it's up to you to prove the positive, and 2) I have provided logic reasonings to back up my assumption. See above, see below, see previous posts. My conclusion trumps your due to my evidence that I've shown to support my side. You, on the other hand, are merely making various, blanket statements, and showing examples, but as mentioned at least a thousand times, that aren't expanded on, nor are "reasonable" in that they've been disputed properly.

I have posted what I think that have happened. Sidious was applying great intensity in his Lightning to punish Luke as severely as possible. Luke's screams showed this.

I don't recall ever denying that he wasn't, but that's not the real crux of this discussion. Try actually reviewing what I write, instead of presenting a claim as if I argued against it, or believed otherwise.

What we're talking about is the culmination of his power at that point focused into the repeated, and continuous blasts.

You obviously did not understood my point. I said that Luke was becoming weaker and weaker as Lightning hit him. He was about to die. You don't need to tell me your theories on this.

If you would've read what I wrote, you'd notice I posted an inquiry (#2) about what you were trying to say. After that, I was merely explaining why he did not use all the power possible when administering the lightning to Luke.

Anyways, how can anyone understand what you write when you cannot even speak proper English? "Did not understood"? Dumbass.

Next time, try responding to the numbered points, instead of - again - making a blanket statement that is supposed to cover it all. As well, you'll now need to respond to what I wrote on #3, due to the fact that it covers my premise, and firmly disproves your belief.

And he came back? Didn't he?

Dharma H. Buddha on toast. Will you please just one time be able to comprehend what I've written? Do I need to decipher everything I write? It's not as if I'm speaking in binary.

You said that the reason he recovered in mere seconds was because of "the advantage of the Force", I responded by basically saying that AotC Anakin, who's more skillful, took light years to recuperate in comparison. Now, not only was Anakin blasted by Count Dooku, who Sidious is far superior to as of RotJ, but he was electrocuted with a single hand.

So, it stands to reason then that, if Sidious were to implement the summit of his efficacy into the lightning, Luke wouldn't have gotten up in mere seconds as he did.

Palpatine wanted him dead in ROTJ. End of story.

Originally posted by Lightsnake
He didn't want to kill him quickly. Notice all the taunts throughout? The short zaps? The PAUSES?

You're a fool. It is specifically stated Palpatine minimized his own abilities there to torture Luke slowly

And you know a lot then why waste time arguing here?

So, this is now an inquisition, I suppose. Seriously speaking, though, debating has become a hobby of mine. So, naturally, I like to debate, and like to debunk many of the idiotic statements, and assumptions here. Point in case: you.

A Sith Lord generates Force Lightning using one hand. The intensity is strong. Now at the same time he uses his other hand to generate Force Lightning. This second wave of Force Lightning will combine with that of the First wave of Force Lightning and the instenity will be doubled. See the logic?

I see what you're saying, but that doesn't necessarily justify the overall point. If you bothered to read the real life example I gave, you'd notice why what you're insinuating isn't absolute.

Taking another example, yet again, this time read it, instead of thinking you actually have a damn clue of what you're talking about:

Let's say we were back in the Edo period, for example, and I'm a samurai, armed with a katana. Now, if wanted to, I could make a side swiping attack (lightning) on my opponent more powerful using one arm compared to using two. I can do this by applying more force, and speed into my swing (intensity), and when using two hands, I can use a considerably less amount of the aforesaid elements, and generate a weaker version of the attack, even though, I'm using two hands to swing the weapon.

This is all if I wanted to. Now, it's clearly established that Palpatine was torturing Luke, so why would he want to use all of his power? He definitely wouldn't, because he'd die, or at worst, be in a comatose after the first surge.

You are just making an assertion that Sidious was not ulitizing his full power on Luke.

Except I'm backing it up. That's the difference between you, and me. Also, if you want to parrot what I'm saying to you, and attempt to spin it around on me, I'd advise that you at least counter what I write, and make sense.

You don't know this because you are not Lucas.

Classic defense. I laughed out loud when I read this. If this is the case with all debates that aren't completely definitive, then there's no point to constructing arguments, at all.

But, then you take into account that the versus forum works in a way that whichever position is more sensible, provides logical deduction, and reasoning is right until disputed with something more rational, and there you have it. As ways work, my point of view is seemingly correct.

Let me take what you've said, and tell you that almost nothing, unless seen in the movies, or said by Lucas is indisputable (even some things in the movies, which can be interpreted, though, aren't irrefutable). For all we know, Lucas envisions someone like Qrrrl Toq as more powerful than Exar Kun. But, since he hasn't stated anything like that, or even alluded to it, we discuss it, and debate it.

Oh, and just for kicks, you aren't George Lucas, either.

I am not here to out-debate you because I don't need to waste my time on you.

Translation: I cannot outsmart, outwit, or out debate you on any points, because I'm uninformed, misinformed, and an idiot. I'll resort to saying that I don't need to "waste my time on you", but in reality, I don't want to waste time on looking like a complete fool at every turn.

P.S. You don't have manners!

You don't have proper manners to stay civil in debates.

I most certainly do possess the ability to remain cordial, ask Lightsnake (at times, lol), Darth Sexy, Gideon, Subjekt, and the like. I may get smart, and insult my opposition, but it's due to the fact that I'm tired of the continuous amount of users who actually think they're right, when they don't even know what the hell they're talking about. It happens every single day, and I guarantee there's not a single thread that doesn't contain it.

Anyways, I'm not going to justify myself further. I have no need to, if you can't handle the heat, either get the hell out of the forum, or don't make asinine statements. The Terms of Service for KMC do not contain "be polite". It's not a prerequisite, so don't expect it.

It was a great display of power. The intensity of his Lightning was causing extreme pain to Luke.

No, "great displays of power" would be these:




http://youtube.com/watch?v=3gO_cJjBh-k
http://youtube.com/watch?v=DvpMQ3FxKLk

What he did to Luke was nothing like that. It was causing pain, yippy-ki-ya! I'm not going to expand further, the pictures, and videos (at their respective lightning segments) speak for themselves in comparison to what happened in RotJ.

Luke survived because of his strong will and strength in the Force.

No, Luke was able to live, because Palpatine didn't use his utmost power. And I'm not just "stating" that, I've already given what my side needed to be able to claim that. No need to repeat myself, or copy and paste.

Sidious's Lightning was near his greatest. He was maximizing the pain of Luke.

No, he could not have been generating the maximum of his power, or else Luke would've been dead. Also, when you say "Sidious' lightning was near his greatest" (fixed grammatical errors), do you mean that he was executing the highest amount of power into his attack? Or that Sidious' Force power, during RotJ, was close to his peak?

The latter is correct, but completely irrelevant. It wouldn't matter if he was at his most powerful point in power, because he could still use a very weak amount. The former isn't correct, and has been addressed, and has not been proved by your side. So, quit stating it.

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
Well! his defensive abilities were not highly developed by ROTS. Yoda managed to deflect Sidious's Lightning because his defensive abilities were strong.

Luke Skywalker didn't even appear in RotS, dolt (and yes, I already knew that was yet another error, however, I love making you look like a fool). Now, to get back on point, I'll state: irrelevant misdirection.

You said: "The only problem was that he did not knew how to deflect the Lightning with his hands". I rebutted that, and thus was leaving you with the option of making the case that you supposedly can construct (I already know that's bullshit, though).

What the **** does Yoda have to do with Luke's endurance? Whoops! Looks like you don't even know what you're arguing against, or what you even said.

Resorting to insults now. I am done with you. You might be a good debator but you don't have manners.

Try, "one of the best debaters". And no, I'm not trying to boast, too many people have named me as one of the best (ever). But, yeah, addressed this already.

That Lightning he used on stormtroopers spread out in wide area because he wanted to target many enemeis.

It doesn't matter. I'm not saying "because the magnitude was large, it's super special awesome!", I'm saying because the magnitude was so great, and because he instantly killed a battalion of Stormtroopers, it's super special awesome. Since it branched out on so many different levels, the power wouldn't be as great if it were only focused on a single person, seeing as they'd be assaulted with all that power on a singular level.

So, try again, chump change.

In case of Luke, their was only one target so obviously Sidious would not need to fill an entire room when targeting him.

That wasn't the point, see above, Limbaugh.

Sora might be stronger then Luke in some aspects but not in all aspects. Luke's training was complete by ROTJ period

Right, so you're saying with no formal training, and a few years at best to even train. His training is "complete". Riiight. You're basing this off the fact Darth Vader said it? Wow, I hate to break the news to you, but he's a fallible, third party character, and has no knowledge of what Luke underwent, so his dialogue isn't proof.

If his training was really complete, why did he swing his lightsaber wildly, like a baseball bat? Why did he feed into the Darkside (he was trained to be a Jedi, so clearly his training wasn't complete)? Why wasn't he considered a Jedi master? Why isn't he considered by George Lucas to be "as skillful as the young Jedi of the prequels", or "as acrobatic", WHY! OH WHYY-YYY! You gotta' do me like that?

His training was far from being fulfilled in actuality. I love how Anakin, who's got more potential than Luke, formal instruction, and years more of it, still hadn't entirely completed his training in RotS, after ten years, yet Luke, after a couple years, at most, was done with all of his tutoring. Likewise, Obi-Wan, even as TPM, when he had 20 odd years of experience, was still a padawan.

and he defeated Vader in combat.
He also tolerated Sidious's Lightning to a great extent. I would say that Luke > Sora even by ROTS period.

Then you're mistaken. There's no chance in hell that Luke's defenses were greater than Sora's. My god, I've already provided short reasons why, and the more logical perspective points to Sora being more well equipped to defend against lightning, and having more strength in the Force, at that point. He's demonstrated greater Force power than Luke, such as being able to Force push Mace Windu, and the like.

No my fault. You can't say that Luke had weak defensive abilities in ROTJ.

Except he did, and I can, and I did.

Yoda countered Sidious's Lightning in the end of fight? Didn't he?
Originally posted by Lightsnake
The initial blast? Palpatine was not trying to kill him.
Later on in the senate chamber? Yoda was BLOCKING it, for one

And for two, he got blasted aback, even doing such.

And Yoda was very old when he fought Sidious. His body was not as strong as that of Luke.

Irrelevant. We've seen Yoda survive a fall from a mountainous height in RotS during the Senate Chamber duel, and still be conscious. So, your point holds no water. I could also bring up that AotC Anakin was as durable as (if not more than) Luke's, yet he was out for nearly two minutes from Count Dooku. I could also bring up that Sora Bulq had to have the endurance of a neophyte farmboy, yet he was knocked out cold.

Furthermore, I could also bring to attention the fact that Yoda was "very old", yet displays far more athleticism, and acrobatics during his duels than RotJ Luke could've dreamed of, because he uses the Force to do such. Indeed, your point is moot.

Advent! ROTJ was developed in 1970's. Technology was not very advanced at that time.

Another classic defense. It doesn't matter if RotJ, or the entire OT was made in the Dark Ages, the movies are canon, and thus what we see, is what is. If you really want me to get into further details, just ask, and I'm seriously not kidding -- any point you so much as attempt to make will get demolished. But, if you want to argue against canon, and prove your idiocy even farther, then by all means, do so.

ROTJ Luke was not weak in comparison to PT comrades but he was not on par with them and I will admit this.

When contrasted to the top dogs of the PT? He's a thousand zillion, ****ing light years away from them.

Remember that AOTC and ROTS movies were developed usng highly advanced technology. So characters in these movies looked far more impressive.

Another classic defense. It doesn't matter if RotJ, or the entire OT was made in the Dark Ages, the movies are canon, and thus what we see, is what is. If you really want me to get into further details, just ask, and I'm seriously not kidding -- any point you so much as attempt to make will get demolished. But, if you want to argue against canon, and prove your idiocy even farther, then by all means, do so.

Really, though, the entire rebuttal will consist of: the movies are the highest form of canon, ergo Luke swings his lightsaber like a madman in RotJ, undeniably, etc. Regarding the following two statement you made after this one: they're irrelevant, stupid (for lack of a better word), and I don't feel the need to address them, so I won't.

The thing is that he was applying great intensity in his Lightning at some point when targetting Luke.

No shit, but nowhere near his upper limit, and definitely not the greatest amount possible, which was your original statement that you defended.

Edit:

And I could give a shit less if you believe that "you've addressed these" or "I expanded on my points" already through dealing with Lightsnake, and Sexy (plus, I know that you cannot properly reply to anything, anyways). I didn't have time to post this yesterday when I wrote it in MS Word, so it's posted now. Deal with it.

Oh, and Gideon, nice post, my love.

And, I hate to quadruple post, especially just to make a correction, and add on, but oh well, sue me the time limit expired:

The bold part of your post is what I have been trying to say for a long time here but nobody checked it.

No, it's not. Seeing as I cared enough to check your next post (ha!), you're taking what I said, and making an inaccurate interpretation.

They aren't "naturally" more resistant, however, due to the fact that they can use the Force to amplify, or heal themselves, they can withstand the effects more than a normal being. However, for example, if they were sleeping, and someone used stealth to sneak up on them, and blasted them with Force lightning, I doubt they could do anything.

Sexy's inference of what I wrote was correct. Yours? Not so much.

And, an example of someone who is considered relatively strong in the Force, as Lightsnake pointed out, Rayf Ysanna (who successfully freed the Ysanna tribe leaders who had been frozen in carbonite by Palpatine, along with Kam, and Luke, as well as been contributory in saving Jaina, and Jacen -- clearly he was no shoddy Force user). He was killed by a single blast of Force lightning by Emporer Palpatine, and this was when Palpatine's body had been weak, as you can see in the following panel:

Owned.