Wolverine..........peak-human?

Started by zozo_yoyo_xoxo13 pages

I still say beyond having his heart cut out the feats in Havoc/Wolverine Meltdown are some of his most amazing.

Originally posted by King KAM
canibus ate LL and Eminem, Em never said anything impressive he called him a *****...wow...not impressive.

Canibus is one of the illest alive.... but hes wasting his talent. peep this analogy

The way canibus uses his his skill is like using Mjolnir to hammer in nails... i mean sure, it would be great at hammering in nails, no hammer could hammer nails better.... but its just such a waste of its talents.... ya kno?

Nope...He destroyed Canibus and Jermaine Dupree in Can-I-*****...go listen to the track. Just my opinion though. I gotta agree with you on the fact that Canibus is one of the illest lyricist out there. Who else do u listen to?

the debate over the "nuke" went on for like, twenty pages, capt. there's no proof it was a nuke, and there's not much proof that it wasnt. please stop bringing it up like you referencing it again makes it so.

It's not the best feat to really bring up. 😬 It's like SvsFL.

In Meltdown he took Blasts on a par with nuclear explosions according to the narration.

Originally posted by Janitor Joe
And they can't come back from the dead.

Actually Thor bought all the Asgardians back from the dead once in Thor 301 so they probably can.

Originally posted by Disappear
the debate over the "nuke" went on for like, twenty pages, capt. there's no proof it was a nuke, and there's not much proof that it wasnt. please stop bringing it up like you referencing it again makes it so.

it was stated in the comic to be a "nuke" there really is no need for a debate.

Originally posted by Tha C-Master
It's not the best feat to really bring up. 😬 It's like SvsFL.

how? That does not even make sense. Spiderman vs firelord is in no way like wolverine taking a nuke.........

Originally posted by capt it up
it was stated in the comic to be a "nuke" there really is no need for a debate.

It was also later stated by the writer himself that it was a napalm bomb.

Originally posted by Accel
It was also later stated by the writer himself that it was a napalm bomb.

no it was not. Please proof this was ever stated. naplam looks nothing like that. so firsat the author states it a nuke and then later stated it was napalm? I find that hard to believe. So please proof this with evidence

Don't have it on me, so you can believe it's a lie if you want.

Though, I don't recall the author ever outright stating it was a nuke to begin with, other than having a character say Wolverine was "nuked," which is ambiguous at best.

Originally posted by zozo_yoyo_xoxo
In Meltdown he took Blasts on a par with nuclear explosions according to the narration.

In Meltdown they were definately nuke level blasts.

Are we seriously debating whether it was a nuke or not?

Seriously, his pants were fine

How the hell can u say it was a nuke when his freakin' pants survived?!?

Originally posted by Grimm22
Are we seriously debating whether it was a nuke or not?

Seriously, his pants were fine

How the hell can u say it was a nuke when his freakin' pants survived?!?

Healing factor ermm

😛

Originally posted by Grimm22
Are we seriously debating whether it was a nuke or not?

Seriously, his pants were fine

How the hell can u say it was a nuke when his freakin' pants survived?!?

any bomb woud destroy his pants so that pritty much makes your comment moot...........

Originally posted by capt it up
any bomb woud destroy his pants so that pritty much makes your comment moot...........

😆 touché

Originally posted by Grimm22
Are we seriously debating whether it was a nuke or not?

Seriously, his pants were fine

How the hell can u say it was a nuke when his freakin' pants survived?!?

Wait, were his pants jeans?
We've seen what Hulk has done with those thangs, so your point is pretty much moot if it is.

I love bigban lol

i do recall the term "nuked" being used, not the term "nuke" referring directly to the bomb. nuke is not a military term, either, as most atomic bombs are never referred to as such due to secrecy and other military hullabaloo. even a low-yield nuke would've caused intensely more devastation than what occurred on panel. like i said, it's an impossible case to prove or disprove either way. so let's all agree to just shut up about it.

Originally posted by capt it up
how? That does not even make sense. Spiderman vs firelord is in no way like wolverine taking a nuke.........
If it's a real nuke it's a horrible feat. 😬