Originally posted by Disappear
if the creator allegedly says it's something you want [a la a flashback,] you'll support it. if the creator allegedly says it's something you don't want [a la napalm,] you'll say it doesn't count.you are a master of subterfuge.
You like to run around arguements. It was stated on pannel to have happen by the narator, but becuase he a nazi it not usable? Honestly thats the most pethetic arguement I have ever heard. Please go read the issue and make sure you check out the very back
Originally posted by capt it up
not at all since the creator never said napalm nor was it shown as napam since you know that napam does not explode like that and work much different thena bomb......what you are refferring to is some BS some one on the forum said that you took as fact.
............Actually cap, Napalm can be used in a bomb. How Napalm works is, bomb drops, explodes (just like a normal bomb) and the jellylike substance burns much hotter, much longer, and spreads much faster then the fires of a normal bomb.
I think your thinking about Napalm the was used from Fire boats, or Infantry troops during WW2, in this case, would be the Napalm you are referring to.
I don't care what you guys are talking about, just wanted to clear that up.
using terms like "allegedly" means i'm not taking it as fact. but believe what you will.
i'm not running around any arguments. i'm bringing up inconsistency in your arguments, and also poking legitimate holes in your "concrete" reasoning. you're willing to disregard things when it suits you, but unwilling to bend on things which should be taken with a grain of salt. it's why the fanboy status got stuck on you in the first place.
Originally posted by Disappear
using terms like "allegedly" means i'm not taking it as fact. but believe what you will.i'm not running around any arguments. i'm bringing up inconsistency in your arguments, and also poking legitimate holes in your "concrete" reasoning. you're willing to disregard things when it suits you, but unwilling to bend on things which should be taken with a grain of salt. it's why the fanboy status got stuck on you in the first place.
it was stated by the narrator that it happen.
you are saying the nuke is napam becuase of nothing. It was never once stated as napam by any source. Your arguement is useless.
your trying to say im allowing some facts but not others. Un true. if you are able to proof that it was stated as napalm then it was, but if you are unable to then your arguement is uselss.
it was astated fact in the comic that logan had all those things happen to him. You are trying to argue actaull facts.
so im a fanboy becuase I using facts while your not?