Alpha Centauri
Restricted
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
or doing what society thinks they should do if they decide to get married. like if the guy wants to get married, and the woman loves him as i posted, then she should do it. OBVIOUSLY when she is ready, not a month or year or whenever from when he states his interests into entering a binding contract such as marriage, but when she is ready. if it takes a few years, he will wait for her. the door swings both ways. if she wants it, he should EVENTUALLY do it, and vice versa. the whole "things wouldnt change much" theory that we agree on works both ways.
It will always be society conditioning if you're not getting married for legal reasons. Why? Because there is simply no other reason to do so. Love doesn't enter into it at all. Love doesn't need marriage.
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
also, a successful relationship hinges entirely upon EQUAL compromise. the guy makes sacrifices, just as the girl does. FJ and I have this down to a science.
Wake up someday and realise that you and FJ are not every couple in the world. The divorce rate tells a different tale.
It's clearly not all sacrifice from both, because marriage is conditioned and if one wants it and the other doesn't, who feels bad? Who feels obligated to change? The one WANTING to? No.
Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
it took a while, but we have learnt to read each other and see who is more in need of whatever they want at that specific moment. sometimes its 50/50. sometimes its 70/30. sometimes its 90/10. but, it all averages out to 50/50, or pretty close to it.
someday you will change your tune, trust me. when i was 20 (you are 20, right?) there was NO WAY i was getting married. i was gonna be a Rogue forever. BUT....things happen, your outlook on life changes. things that happened to me (i think i told only Bardock about it via pm's) made me see life differently.
BTW: whats this hallmark conspiracy theory you speak of? 😂
Please don't dare be so presumptuous and desperate as to use the geriatric debate of "Someday you'll...". No. How about you let me decide what I'll do? Does that work? Swell.
"I said no way, but I did. That means you will!". No, it means you lacked the conviction to stick to your beliefs, RJ. It doesn't mean I'll abandon mine.
I never said I'd be a rogue, I said I'd never get married, I don't want to. That's a fact.
Originally posted by Robtard
What's B.S. is you telling others of their subjective feelings and what they're really feeling or not.
Excuse me? I didn't tell anyone what they're feeling or not, I said marriage is illogical when you truly break it all down into sense and reason, and it is. Nobody has proven me wrong yet. Have the balls to admit it, please.
Originally posted by Robtard
As far as other ways of expressing love, you're absolutely correct, people express love in different ways, i.e it's subjective.
And proof is that you don't need a legally binding contract to do so, as we are all raised to believe. Outside of monetary purposes there is no LOGICAL reason to do so. If they want it, fine, go for it. If it makes you happy, do it. THAT is subjective. What ISN'T subjective is there being reasons other than money or legality, for marriage. There isn't.
Name some, if there are. Love? No, it isn't necessary. Children? Not necessary really either.
Originally posted by Robtard
Yes, I've been in a wedding and I have been to many... "self-indulgent" and "self-important" are subjective.
That was never under argument, it was a side issue.
Originally posted by Robtard
Correct, love and marriage are not inherently connected, that doesn't automatically mean they can't be as people get married for different reasons, sometimes out of greed, sometimes out of pressure and guest what, sometimes out of love. It happens.
You're missing the point again.
People get married out of love, that doesn't mean they needed to, it doesn't mean the love is increased. Marriage does not ADD anything, it does not take away anything by not being there. The very fact that unmarried couples exist proves that.
People can give love as their reason all they want, but that doesn't make it necessary. Marriage is not necessary. There's no logical reason (That's not to say it's WRONG, as you believe I'm saying) for it.
Originally posted by Robtard
I'm conditioned... If you say so, but I am not fighting to justify marriage, I am saying marriage can be about love, not it has to be about love. On the other hand, you're taking an absolute stance on something clearly subjective.
You're misunderstanding me AGAIN.
Marriage can be ABOUT love from anyone's point of view, but when broken down, when asked "Why?". There is no LOGICAL reason. Illogical doesn't mean wrong, it means illogical.
"We want to get married!", "Why?", "We love each other.", "Yes, but you don't need to get married.", "We choose to.", "That's fine, but it's still not logical.". That's my point.
Originally posted by Robtard
Seems like your [possible] fears and negative bias towards marriage are not letting you think objectively. If you think marriage is B.S. and you never want to marry, no problem, that's your choice, but don't lay the law to others feelings or how they feel. I for one married out of love as legally, my marriage has given me at best a small tax break, nothing else.
Oh great. Can't back the debate up on normal grounds so you resort to "It's your fears.". No, it's not fear. It's me being able to see that marriage isn't necessary in any way other than monetary.
Whether or not people choose to do it out of love is irrelevant. That doesn't make it logical, it makes it choice. Choices aren't inherently logical just because you WANT to make them.
You married out of love, great, it wasn't necessary though.
-AC