Who's at fault when students fail?

Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
Yes, she did have an opinion that was differential from mine. All you've done here is point out the obvious.

Strawman, Logical Fallacy.

You're avoiding the primary scenario here. She expressed an opinion that was ignorant. She eliminated all available circumstance and left room for no elaboration within her opinion. She also made a statement with a lack of general knowledge of the particular subject, which was evident. She spoke out of ignorance.

Simple, eh? Well, apparently not for you. Heh.

Appeal to Force, Logical Fallacy.

You're trying to eliminate general logic and force your personal opinion of what her opinion expressed as stone-written.

Won't happen as long as I'm typing, son. You need to prove how she was not ignorant. Simple?

Come back when you're in your league, 'kay?

That post is written by something so confused, it doesn't know whether to scratch its watch or wind its ass. Your post is an orgy of stultifying cacophonous verbal depravity; an exercise in literary impotence, and an offense to all of good taste and decency.

-AC

Originally posted by AssClown
That post is written by something so confused, it doesn't know whether to scratch its watch or wind its ass. Your post is an orgy of stultifying cacophonous verbal depravity; an exercise in literary impotence, and an offense to all of good taste and decency.

-AC

Ad Hominem and Pseudo Intellectualism, Logical Fallacy.

This is child's play.

Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
Ad Hominem and Pseudo Intellectualism, Logical .Fallacy.

This is child's play.

Reading your post makes blindness a wonderful thing to look forward to.

You're right your post requires childs latin son.

-AC

Originally posted by AssClown
Reading your post makes blindness a wonderful thing to look forward to.

You're right your post requires childs latin son.

-AC

Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
Ad Hominem and Pseudo Intellectualism, Logical Fallacy.

This is child's play.

🙂

Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
🙂

That's my smillie.

Originally posted by AssClown
Well i'm off out so you can relax Mr repetitive reposter. I enjoyed this, I hope you realise I couldn't care less about the point and you've been trolled. See you in another identity.

-AC

Originally posted by AssClown
That's my smillie.

Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
Yes, she did have an opinion that was differential from mine. All you've done here is point out the obvious.

Strawman, Logical Fallacy.

You're avoiding the primary scenario here. She expressed an opinion that was ignorant. She eliminated all available circumstance and left room for no elaboration within her opinion. She also made a statement with a lack of general knowledge of the particular subject, which was evident. She spoke out of ignorance.

Simple, eh? Well, apparently not for you. Heh.

Appeal to Force, Logical Fallacy.

You're trying to eliminate general logic and force your personal opinion of what her opinion expressed as stone-written.

Won't happen as long as I'm typing, son. You need to prove how she was not ignorant. Simple?

Come back when you're in your league, 'kay?

Owned.

Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
Owned.

Trolled 🙂

Bye little Fishy.

😆

-AC

Originally posted by AssClown
Trolled 🙂

Bye little Fishy.

😆

-AC

You trolled, I shot you down.

Simple. I played along. Nothing else to do. You effectively entertained me for free.

Go now. Thanks.

Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
You trolled, I shot you down.

Simple. I played along. Nothing else to do. You effectively entertained me for free.

Go now. Thanks.

Little Fishy on the hook 😆

-AC

Originally posted by AssClown
Little Fishy on the hook 😆

-AC

Yes, you are.

Look up "Baiting" on the internet.

It will tell you between Seraphim XIII and AssClown who the bait and who the baiter was.

Owned again.

Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
Yes, you are.

Look up "Baiting" on the internet.

It will tell you between Seraphim XIII and AssClown who the bait and who the baiter was.

Owned again.

Damn, you got badly owned

Originally posted by Molly Hayes
Damn, you got badly owned

Hi AssClown.

Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
Yes, you are.

Look up "Baiting" on the internet.

It will tell you between Seraphim XIII and AssClown who the bait and who the baiter was.

Owned again.

Wow, you looked really silly.

In the end too many factors are involved for the blame to be placed anywhere.

Some kids don't care.
Some parents don't encourage their children enough.
Some schools don't have the money they need.
Some teachers aren't very good at their jobs.

The list goes on.

At the simplest level it comes down to a child's desire to learn and a school's ability to make that possible.

Originally posted by Garfield Cat
Wow, you looked really silly.

Lol, Hello again AssClown.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
In the end too many factors are involved for the blame to be placed anywhere.

Some kids don't care.
Some parents don't encourage their children enough.
Some schools don't have the money they need.
Some teachers aren't very good at their jobs.

The list goes on.

At the simplest level it comes down to a child's desire to learn and a school's ability to make that possible.

Originally posted by §P0oONY
Why do the children not care? Why do some children not have desire to learn?

It can be cultural (more focus is put on things other than education) or psychological (they just don't care).

Originally posted by Molly Hayes
Damn, you got badly owned

He really did, thanks for msning me Garfield. That guy was a grade "A" loser.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
It can be cultural (more focus is put on things other than education) or psychological (they just don't care).

Originally posted by §P0oONY
So upbringing?

Not neccessarily.

A good upbringing can make a kid want to learn but then again what we define as a good upbringing often comes when the child is from a well to do family who can afford to send them to a school that is well funded so statistics can be hard to interpert.

Also some children just don't care. There isn't always a clearly defined reason for it.