Who's at fault when students fail?

Started by Seraphim XIII12 pages

Originally posted by Mr Tom Cat
Although my neice is on for an A. So I must be doing something right.

I'd do an effernescent wave if you want, i used that for immuno assaying. That's quantum energy fluctuations in visible light.

I did the CA cycle as an undergrad twenty years ago.

I did the CA cycle in grade ten. 😐

Why are you speaking of QE Fluctuations?

What happened to Macroscopic Thermodynamics? I thought we were going to discuss that.

You seem to just be spouting off random tidbits of scientific information to make yourself look smart.

Look! Me too!

E=mc²

*GASP*

Originally posted by Mr Tom Cat
Actually i'm not wong it was just incomplete.🙂

I gave all the others, if I used a search engine I wouldn't have missed that. I think it was because you had it laid out slightly wrong.

🙂

Actually, I laid it out quite correctly. If you did not pick up the perpetual loop, that's a problem. You need a visual picture? I would've assumed you would've been able to pick up a textbook chemical layout.

I know you're not Wong. He runs the grocery circa down the street. 😛

Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
I did the CA cycle in grade ten. 😐

Why are you speaking of QE Fluctuations?

What happened to Macroscopic Thermodynamics? I thought we were going to discuss that.

You seem to just be spouting off random tidbits of scientific information to make yourself look smart.

Look! Me too!

E=mc²

*GASP*

I suspect you didn't do the proton donor part in grade ten on that equation.

Not really, I don't do Macroscopic Thermodynamics so I thought i'd ask you about a type of physics I know about. So how would an effernescent wave fit into an enzyme linked immuno assay?

I jumped through a hoop, now it's your turn.

🙂

Originally posted by Mr Tom Cat
I suspect you didn't do the proton donor part in grade ten on that equation.

Not really, I don't do Macroscopic Thermodynamics so I thought i'd ask you about a type of physics I know about. So how would an effernescent wave fit into an enzyme linked immuno assay?

I jumped through a hoop, now it's your turn.

🙂

A homologous enzyme-linked immunoassay? Immunosorbent assay? Could you be specific?

And you never jumped through the hoop, really. I wanted to talk about Thermodynamics, with relation to my job and what I studied. I'm down for physics though.

Wow, students,woW.

Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
A homologous enzyme-linked immunoassay? Immunosorbent assay? Could you be specific?

And you never jumped through the hoop, really. I wanted to talk about Thermodynamics, with relation to my job and what I studied. I'm down for physics though.

Immunosorbent, it will only work with a "tagged" ELISA.

Originally posted by Soleran
Wow, students,woW.

😂

🙂

Originally posted by Mr Tom Cat
Immunosorbent, it will only work with a "tagged" ELISA.

You know what? I don't know on this one. Why don't you explain? I'd like to hear. I'm interested.

It's unlikely it's on a search engine. Which is why I chose it. If you understand Physics you'll get my explanation.

🙂

If you don't you won't.

🙂

Originally posted by Mr Tom Cat
It's unlikely it's on a search engine. Which is why I chose it. If you understand Physics you'll get my explanation.

🙂

If you don't you won't.

🙂

ORLY? You should not generalize physics to one branch. It's very open and I do not excel in serum and such.

Well, I got it wrong and I wasn't trying to review it on a search engine. Since you take interest into physics, name the physical equation I am to represent.

Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
You know what? I don't know on this one. Why don't you explain? I'd like to hear. I'm interested.

Basically in doing an ELISA you can tag enzymes so the luminosity is read in luminometer. The amount of light given from the tagging process can be measured at very minute levels in ultra sensitive assays. Various phosphates can be used as tags. Where the effernescent wave comes in is that the levels on dual readings can sometime remain the same despite energy going elsewhere due to the quantum nature of light. In this case whilst a change is registered in luminosity given out through a reflection. All the energy is still measured in a straight line. Which is simply weird and a bit odd for a biologist like me.

Originally posted by Mr Tom Cat
Basically in doing an ELISA you can tag enzymes so the luminosity is read in luminometer. The amount of light given from the tagging process can be measured at very minute levels in ultra sensitive assays. Various phosphates can be used as tags. Where the effernescent wave comes in is that the levels on dual readings can sometime remain the same despite energy going elsewhere due to the quantum nature of light. In this case whilst a change is registered in luminosity given out through a reflection. All the energy is still measured in a straight line. Which is simply weird and a bit odd for a biologist like me.

Hah, that's quite interesting.

So ...

My turn.

Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
ORLY? You should not generalize physics to one branch. It's very open and I do not excel in serum and such.

Well, I got it wrong and I wasn't trying to review it on a search engine. Since you take interest into physics, name the physical equation I am to represent.

Oh, don't bother googling it.

Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
ORLY? You should not generalize physics to one branch. It's very open and I do not excel in serum and such.

Well, I got it wrong and I wasn't trying to review it on a search engine. Since you take interest into physics, name the physical equation I am to represent.

My Physics stopped at A level. My turn as you take an interest in biology. Here's a simple one. What's shotgunning in biology? Exactly my point about biology.
Could be gravitational.

Originally posted by Mr Tom Cat
My Physics stopped at A level. My turn as you take an interest in biology. Here's a simple one. What's shotgunning in biology? Exactly my point about biology.
Could be gravitational.

Shotgunning is used in Genome Sequencing, is it not?

Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
Shotgunning is used in Genome Sequencing, is it not?

Near, but not exactly. It's a 70's method for introducing genetic information into a cell. Using a microsyringe you could "shotgun" DNA into fertilised embryos or plasmids into cells etc.

Originally posted by Mr Tom Cat
Near, but not exactly. It's a 70's method for introducing genetic information into a cell. Using a microsyring you could "shotgun" DNA into fertilised embryos or plasmids into cells etc.

Is this going anywhere? Now we're just sharing facts. Lol.

Originally posted by Seraphim XIII
Is this going anywhere? Now we're just sharing facts. Lol.

Not really, I guess we are just sharing facts. Anyway it's been fun. Have a good night. Oh, I spelt syringe wrong. 🙂

Was that gravity in relation to distance for something?

It was the expression for the gravitational flux of a point mass.