Thor 9/10 Wonder woman
Thor 7.5/10 Superman
Thor beats wonderwoman because he just to da** powerful
Thor beats superman because of his versatility and hes a magical being who lightning and hammer would end up weakning superman.
Speed dont work on a born bred warrior like thor. Thor has been trained and has dealt with speedster and ALWAYS find way to overcome them. One good planet destroying hammer hit to the head and wonderwoman is gone.
Originally posted by carver9
Thor 9/10 Wonder woman
Thor 7.5/10 SupermanThor beats wonderwoman because he just to da** powerful
Thor beats superman because of his versatility and hes a magical being who lightning and hammer would end up weakning superman.Speed dont work on a born bred warrior like thor. Thor has been trained and has dealt with speedster and ALWAYS find way to overcome them. One good planet destroying hammer hit to the head and wonderwoman is gone.
This isn't proof. This is opinion.
Originally posted by nvrbeenwthagirl
Subjective. The Midgard Serpent didn't weight nearly as much as the earth. Not even a third. IT would have knocked the planet out of orbit. ANd Thor never knocked the planet out of orbit in an arm wrestling match. It was hyperbole. You can even tell in the way that the conversation was going on between the two commentators. The hammer is still a hammer, and it's still enchanted. The feats performed with it cannot count towards his strength. Period.
All feats are subjective.
If it didn't even weigh a third of the earth, how then was it able to crush the earth? Be careful how you answer this because even if it didn't weigh as much of the earth, it was causing enough pressure to crush the earth. Thor resisted and overcame that pressure, which is equally if not more impressive.
Also, I notice how you casually ignored the other feats mentioned.
So you'd have us ignore what was stated in the comic to contribute to your argument? Doesn't work like that Nvr. You can't ignore feats for your benefit.
Enchanted, yes. However there wasn't a strike enhancing enchantment placed upon the mallet.
Your argument sucks; period. 🙁
Originally posted by nvrbeenwthagirl
This isn't proof. This is opinion.
I dont need proof when I read all 3 books and is familiar with all 3. Superman couldnt stand a punch that was stated as being hit by a planet but thor throws hammer blows that is strong enough to destroy planets. Thor is a walking magical being that has numerous of one shot powers and superman himself admitted that he is weak to magic and it has been proven on panel numerous of times that magic always overcomes him (captain marvel one shotting him twice. Thor hammer>>>captain marvel fist.).
Thor versatility>the entire jla, except a gl. Thor strength has been stated as incaculable while it has been established in a interview that superman lifts 5 billion pounds, do the match.
Wonderwoman has been considered supermans equal. I dont agree with a lot of people on the forum when they say that wonderwoman cant get nothing but 1 or 2 wins over superman when she have proven on more than one occasion that she can beat superman. She did own a none holding back superman while holding back and that wasnt the only time that she beat superman.
Originally posted by Dreamcatcher
All feats are subjective.If it didn't even weigh a third of the earth, how then was it able to crush the earth? Be careful how you answer this because even if it didn't weigh as much of the earth, it was causing enough pressure to crush the earth. Thor resisted and overcame that pressure, which is equally if not more impressive.
Also, I notice how you casually ignored the other feats mentioned.
So you'd have us ignore what was stated in the comic to contribute to your argument? Doesn't work like that Nvr. You can't ignore feats for your benefit.
Enchanted, yes. However there wasn't a strike enhancing enchantment placed upon the mallet.
Your argument sucks; period. 🙁
Originally posted by nvrbeenwthagirl
Every one who isn't a Thor boy knows the hammer makes his hits harder. It's indestructible, and enchanted. It glows with magic. I bet thor would rather have it for hitting thanos in the jaw than using his bare fist. Ten to one he has a better chance of making thanos feel it with that hammer than with his fist. The hammer adds to it.
What proof do you have to support this claim?
I notice how you keep ignoring my arguments.
Originally posted by nvrbeenwthagirl
Every one who isn't a Thor boy knows the hammer makes his hits harder. It's indestructible, and enchanted. It glows with magic. I bet thor would rather have it for hitting thanos in the jaw than using his bare fist. Ten to one he has a better chance of making thanos feel it with that hammer than with his fist. The hammer adds to it.
Mechanically, yes.
But no more than an adamantium hammer would.
In fact, as adamantium is denser and more durable than Uru, an adamantium hammer would likely hit even harder than Mjolnir.