Again, does not the potter have power over the clay? Does not the artist exercise arbitrary decisions over what stroke to apply, how much paint to use, or the size of the canvas? Why does the musician have so much control over the notes that he composes or the songwriter the choice of words that he puts into writing? Why do authors reserve so much authority over their writings? All human creators--in the arts--carry out their prerogatives daily yet when God does it over His creation people want to have a fit.
So what ever happened to free will ?
Free will is still in force. Free will is not a license to do whatever you want whenever (that is not what free will is). Free will is the ability/power to choose but, within a set of well-defined parameters. But what you must understand is that free will is not immune to consequences. For example, you could exercise your free will to rob a bank right? But if you did so you would subject yourself to the consequences of your actions correct? It is the same in refernce to God. God as the Creator has set the standard of law (just like in our society). We can abide by that law or go counter to that established order (it is our choice). There will be ramifications if we go outside those boundaries in our own laws, how much more with God's laws? Actually, God is the One Who ordained government in the first place: to curb sin as it were and maintain order. That does not mean that people will automatically obey it just means that the bar/standard has been set for what should be done.
Does not the manufacturer of any product have total control over how that product looks, feels, tastes, behaves, smells, functions, etc? Have you ever destroyed something that you owned SpearofDestiny? I surmise that you have destroyed things that you did not manufacture and yet you did it without compunction or any feeling of wrong. I know that these are crude examples, but it was the best that I could do at this time.
You are comparing human beings to inanimate objects. Nice job 😆
If I torture or destroy an inanimate object, it wont feel any pain. It wont know what's going on.
If I torture an animal or my own child, that would be wrong. That's a better analogy, since God is supposedly our father and creator. Now, tell me...as father of my own child, do I have the right to starve, torture, or kill my own child ? Or a pet for that matter ? I am its master in the end....
Have you ever taken the life of an insect, animal, or other organism (including plants)? If so, who gave you the right to end the life of another living thing that you did not create/manufacture? Again, God does not need me to defend Him, but people accuse Him of being sadistic and cruel when the fact is He is the Creator of all life. We do things everyday that if God were guilty of we would have a fit yet we have no pangs about it. We destroy and kill things all the time and continue on as if nothing was amiss. Yet God exercises His divine right as Creator and Judge of all flesh and the earth--in response to sin and evil--and we jump off of our hypocritical highhorse and want to throw the book at God and give Him the maximum sentence.
Now do you see my point?
At least God--according to the Scriptures--is the Creator of all life. If anyone has the right to give or take a life it is the Creator/manufacturer of that life/thing. If anyone has the power to judge this earth it is the Creator and sustainer of it. How many universes and planets have you created (and sustained by your wisdom and power) Spear of Destiny? How many creatures are you responsible for breathing life into? As soon as you show me the schematic diagram for the universe that you have created I can fax it up to God then you can have the right to criticize God. Until then you have no case. Go look in the mirror and examine your own life (and all that you have done) before finding fault with God to see if you are above reproach. I guarantee you, me, and everyone else are not.
What is your definition of "spirit?"
I can't come up with a clear cut definition, but the best way I can describe it is that every object contains energy. Potential energy is not spiritual, but once this energy occupies a living being, it becomes spiritual- thus spirit extends beyond human, to animal and plant as well.
I see the Earth itself as alive, not dead. It has cyclical functions, and I see it as more of an evolving organism, then just a giant rock with water.
Plants are different from human and animal, but they are still alive. We can't concieve what it is like to be a plant, but we know they are alive. Likewise, I beleive the Earth as a planet is a living thing, even though its difficult for us to conceive what life is for a planet.
I personally feel the same applies to the Universe, but that's another story.
This sounds like pure opinion pal. What do you base your theory about what constitutes "a spirit" on?
I used the above Scriptures to support my belief that God is love in stark contrast to your claim to the contrary.
Well your back up is poor then. You aren't directly addressing my points, but rather side stepping them. That's not an answer JIA, that's a desperate ploy. You're not a stupid person, even if you come off as one. You display a fair knowledge of general science and various studies. I've seen your posts. So I assume you can come up with better arguments than merely copy and paste. Maybe I expected too much from you. My apologies.
I don't understand why you feel that I am not directly answering your points. You cited referenes from the Scriptures that support your position that God is so on and so forth. I used the same approach i.e. I quoted Scriptural references to support my belief that God is love. The difference is you accuse me of side-stepping when I do it and not addressing your points directly.
😕
Earlier you cited instances that you believe support your assertions that God must not be loving, but when I quote Scriptures in support of my belief you discount them as simply writings. Hmmm...I wonder why.
Because they contradict God's actions in the Old Testament. And you still didn't actually address the points, you side stepped them AGAIN, like you always do.
How can someone who is love personified torture and kill so many people ? What kind of love is that? Why can't you just answer that ? Or is that too much for you to justify ?
God is the giver of life in the first place; hence, He (and only He) reserves the right to take that life back at His discretion. We are all God's product; consequently, as the Manufacturer God can recall His product whenever He wants to--especially if He deems it defective i.e. deserving of judgment leading to death. I don't know that you can understand God's display of love. Many people have this idea that God should just show love and only love all the time regardless of what we do. But God is not just love. God is also Judge of all flesh, Judge of all the earth. He is responsible for administrating righteousness and justice in the universe in accordance with the laws that are described in His Word. What you see in the Old Testament is God moving as it were in His Judicial capacity. God is Sovereign but He is righteous in everything that He does (even when you or anyone else can't comprehend what or why God does what He does). I don't even understand everything that God does that is why I must exercise my faith that He is all that the Scriptures reveal that He is, and that He knows what He is doing.
They only appear to be contradictions because (perhaps) you do not understand how God operates. Hang in there though.
They are clearly contradictions. At least logically so.Nice side stepping again 👇
There are no contradictions just different points of view leading to inaccurate interpretations of what is actually going on.
I believe the Scriptures are true. Conversely, you believe the Bible to be simply writings. I guess we are at a stalemate.
No, because I do not claim my opinion as fact. My belief that the Bible is just writings of man is not fact, but belief. I do not claim it as fact. You claim your belief as fact. So there is no stalemate, until you admit that you are only speaking from belief, not fact.
I believe what I believe just like you and everyone else.
Your disbelief and my belief are equally valid or invalid depending one's point of view. I cannot prove that my belief is true and you cannot disprove it. Again, we are at a draw in this regard. [/B][/QUOTE]
It seems to me like you are finally admitting your beliefs are not fact, but beliefs. Am I correct ?
In reference to the Scriptures my beliefs are factual. For example, I believe that God created the heavens and the earth. To me this is a fact not opinion. But I show my credence through my belief--by faith of course because I was not there when God did it.