Originally posted by Wild Shadow
azazel was also mention in the old testament during sacrifice to god and those for azazel in the woods....just because the church did not make it canon does not mean it is any less important... the gospel of thomas is consistered more accurate and older then the other gospels in the bible and is believed to have bn used to inspire the later gospels, and the church refuses to except it as canon because of its contradictive views that questions the churches dogma...
why would the book of revelation be considered inspired by god more so then the book of enoch? they both have fantastical stories that are just as believeable to one another
You'd have to ask God because He is the One Who oversaw the canonization of His Word into the 66 books that constitute the Bible.
I'm sure that the book of Enoch did not meet a certain standard to establish its contents as given by inspiration of God.
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
You'd have to ask God because He is the One Who oversaw the canonization of His Word into the 66 books that constitute the Bible.I'm sure that the book of Enoch did not meet a certain standard to establish its contents as given by inspiration of God.
Are you saying that Constantine was an instrument of your god? 😆
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
You'd have to ask God because He is the One Who oversaw the canonization of His Word into the 66 books that constitute the Bible.I'm sure that the book of Enoch did not meet a certain standard to establish its contents as given by inspiration of God.
wow... i am flabbergastted, do you know the historical facts of how the bible was edited?
bah, people here know that I have read through church history and the editing of scriptures. I don't have the links on my lap top now. But truly there were many scriptures and writing and only certain ones were chosen to be put in the canon. It was more about politics and control. Jesus was not originally thought of as divine, but was voted divine by mere men at one of the councils. There were many odd things going on at that time and a few deaths to make sure that the vote would turn out as the council wanted. Also Josephus never accounted for Jesus as divine in any of his writings. He was a great historian and there was only one little paragraph that was inserted, but not his style of writing. If Jesus was indeed divine, then I am sure that Josephus would of dedicated more than one paragraph to it.
read and learn: first reformation
Originally posted by Wild Shadow
read and learn: first reformation
Can you tell a blind man what the color of the sky is?
Originally posted by Wild ShadowI am very knowledgeable to these forums, but as of late don't have much time to contribute intelligently. I just come on and joke a bit. If I have more time, then I can contribute more...
wasn't really meant for you, but for another less knowledgeable person who shall not b named
Originally posted by Deja~vu
I am very knowledgeable to these forums, but as of late don't have much time to contribute intelligently. I just come on and joke a bit. If I have more time, then I can contribute more...
i really need to start qouting so ppl dont get confuse to who i am replying to....
i am quiet aware that you are knowledgeable, the link was for someone else who had no idea how the bible was written or edited..u urselve know and have a general idea, and so not for for you...
😮 so embarrassed hope i didnt insult u when u thought i was referring to u.
Originally posted by Wild Shadow
uhm.. you realized God caused all of jobs problems by making the bet with the adversary right... and giving him permission to do all that.the biblical adversary couldnt do anything without gods permission and he was considered another angel not a demon.
Yeah, I know he's an angel of God and he oppresses man on the lords behalf.