Originally posted by AngryManatee
eh that's all for now, it's late and I've a dermatologist appointment tommorow.
Why do you keep running from a simple question? What are you afraid of? AngryManatee, can you handle the Truth?
😂
Sorry for laughing but you still have not answered the yes or no question that your entire argument rests on.
💃
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Why do you keep running from a simple question? What are you afraid of? AngryManatee, can you handle the Truth?😂
Sorry for laughing but you still have not answered the yes or no question that your entire argument rests on.
💃
If you had looked at my previous post, you would've seen that I did in fact provide an answer. Whether you choose to accept that answer is up to you, and is most likely the reason why you fail to accept it as an answer. And why is that? Well most likely because it differs from your answer.
😂
Sorry for laughing, but I laugh at subnormality. If you really wish to give a good argument (not to mention gain some respect) about anything scientific that you try to argue, you should have at least have some minor in-depth background in it, instead of performing such antics as arguing over self-assembly or trying to explain the universe with newtonian physics.
Edit: My argument still stands. (Of course not to you because you disagree with anything despite the evidence on my part and the lack of evidence on yours)
Where do you get your information from?
Goodnight everyone else.
Originally posted by Shakyamunison
There is nothing to be saved from. 🙄
You are fixated (almost obsessed with denying salvation through Jesus Christ, but why?) Although that was not what I meant when I said the word saved. I meant taking up for AngryManatee with regard to him not answering my question won't save or rescue him from answering my post. Devil King jumping in to AngryManatee's side of the discussion to try and save or spare him the duty of answering my question won't save him.
Do you follow me?
Originally posted by JesusIsAliveThat is an easy question, go to the mirror and look into it and there is your proof. 😉
The answer to this question should end all debate. Question: have any of those protobionts ever self-assembled without the aid of an intellegent human?I rest my case.
😄
Just because some scientists got together and made the conditions that first created life doesn't negate that they still formed on their own. Why this hasn't happened again is because you don't have any primordial soup just laying around anymore. There was not manipulation to this effect they simply created the conditions and it happened by itself, how is that intelligent design?
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
You are fixated (almost obsessed with denying salvation through Jesus Christ, but why?) Although that was not what I meant when I said the word saved. I meant taking up for AngryManatee with regard to him not answering my question won't save or rescue him from answering my post. Devil King jumping in to AngryManatee's side of the discussion to try and save or spare him the duty of answering my question won't save him.Do you follow me?
You are correct, I did misunderstand you. Sorry for that...
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
You are fixated (almost obsessed with denying salvation through Jesus Christ, but why?) Although that was not what I meant when I said the word saved. I meant taking up for AngryManatee with regard to him not answering my question won't save or rescue him from answering my post. Devil King jumping in to AngryManatee's side of the discussion to try and save or spare him the duty of answering my question won't save him.Do you follow me?
It's funny that you say that when I did not avoid your question. I did state that it is possible for them to self-assemble (liposomes more often since phospholipids naturally join to other phospholipids due to their hydrophobic nature). Also as stated before, they can only assemble into simple forms in our oxidizing atmosphere (which you seem to ignore). In early earth conditions, they are able to form into more complex specimens, oftentimes having cell walls very much similar to a cell's, and are shown to become excited by stimuli from its outside environment.
Just out of curiosity, where do you get your information from? You seem to have ignored this question in all of my last posts from yesterday. Seems hypocritical that you would laugh at my supposed avoidance of your question, despite my answering of it, and not answer my question after multiple posts of it.
Originally posted by JesusIsAlive
Devil King jumping in to AngryManatee's side of the discussion to try and save or spare him the duty of answering my question won't save him.
I'm not jumping in on anybody's side. I just find it interesting how you will respond to a single sentence in a post, when the crux of their post revolves around the other four sentences in it. You do this all the time. You respond to the easiest part of a post because your bible bullshit starts to run out.
Originally posted by Devil King
I'm not jumping in on anybody's side. I just find it interesting how you will respond to a single sentence in a post, when the crux of their post revolves around the other four sentences in it. You do this all the time. You respond to the easiest part of a post because your bible bullshit starts to run out.
I don't think that is possible. After all, his bullshit is endless. 😂
Originally posted by Devil King
I'm not jumping in on anybody's side. I just find it interesting how you will respond to a single sentence in a post, when the crux of their post revolves around the other four sentences in it. You do this all the time. You respond to the easiest part of a post because your bible bullshit starts to run out.
Devil King, Jesus loves you.
😄
To pull us back on topic...
If we were to... [make the] assumption of no oxygen in the original atmosphere, another fatal problem arises. Since the ozone is made of oxygen, it would not exist; and the ultraviolet rays from the sun would destroy any biological molecules.[...]
Because life could not have originated on land, some evolutionists propose that life started in the oceans. The problem with life starting in the oceans, however, is that as organic molecules formed, the water would have immediately destroyed them through a process called hydrolysis.
The common perception left by many textbooks and journals is that Miller and other scientists were successful in producing the amino acids necessary for life. However, the textbooks and media fail to mention that what they had actually produced was a mixture of left- and right-handed amino acids, which is detrimental to life. The natural tendency is for left- and right-handed amino acids to bond together. Scientist still do not know why biological proteins use only left-handed amino acids.
What have scientists calculated the probability to be of an average- size protein occurring naturally? Walter Bradley, Ph.D. materials science, and Charles Thaxton, Ph.D. chemistry,5 calculated that the probability of amino acids forming into a protein is 4.9 x 10-191.[...]
Sir Fred Hoyle, Ph.D. astronomy, and Chandra Wickramasinghe, Professor of Applied Math and Astronomy, calculated that the probability of getting a cell by naturalistic processes is 1 x 10-40,000.