World war hulk

how was scot down played?

Originally posted by Battlehammer
how was scot down played?

Well since the US was still intact afterwards he must have been played down.

Plus it was part of WWH so llgrok won't stand for any feats being leigit.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
Well since the US was still intact afterwards he must have been played down.

Plus it was part of WWH so llgrok won't stand for any feats being leigit.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
Well since the US was still intact afterwards he must have been played down.

Plus it was part of WWH so llgrok won't stand for any feats being leigit.

That's just bullshit.

Cyclops almost went all out in Civil War and it was about to kill him even though Bishop had absorbed tons of energy. When he uses it in WWH he's got no problems at all.

You can't tell the two beams apart? They're pretty different.

Originally posted by llagrok
That's just bullshit.

Cyclops almost went all out in Civil War and it was about to kill him even though Bishop had absorbed tons of energy. When he uses it in WWH he's got no problems at all.

You can't tell the two beams apart? They're pretty different.

Originally posted by llagrok
That's just bullshit.

Cyclops almost went all out in Civil War and it was about to kill him even though Bishop had absorbed tons of energy. When he uses it in WWH he's got no problems at all.

You can't tell the two beams apart? They're pretty different.

I'll be fair here (as I haven't read the issue yet)

1) Does he come out and say he's going to go all out with the attack?
2) Is there anything to say the feat in CivilWar is actually a good gauage of his power?

Originally posted by strengthkills
Did he have his visor on or off?(serious question)

It was off during Civil War and not off during WWH. That COULD make a difference, but when he says that he's going all out, I assume he's going all out.

Originally posted by llagrok
That's just bullshit.

Cyclops almost went all out in Civil War and it was about to kill him even though Bishop had absorbed tons of energy. When he uses it in WWH he's got no problems at all.

You can't tell the two beams apart? They're pretty different.

first of all. Cyclopes used a similar attack against thing befor eback in the day and thing walked right through it.

Now cyclopes is more powerful true then when thing did that. However Hulk is far more powerful then thing and this is the most powerful form of hulk ever so it not a surprize that he is able to over power scots attack.

Originally posted by Battlehammer
maybe he no longer has the problem or they realized what they did in civil war was retared.

first of all. Cyclopes used a similar attack against thing befor eback in the day and thing walked right through it.

Now cyclopes is more powerful true then when thing did that. However Hulk is far more powerful then thing and this is the most powerful form of hulk ever so it not a surprize that he is able to over power scots attack.

Cyclops used a similar attack against Thing 😂

All his attacks are similar to what he did in Civil War, because he shoots concussive beams from his eyes, that doesn't change at all.

Let's keep in mind that Pak completely ignores continuity and doesn't care about what happened in earlier comics.

Originally posted by llagrok
Cyclops used a similar attack against Thing 😂

All his attacks are similar to what he did in Civil War, because he shoots concussive beams from his eyes, that doesn't change at all.

Let's keep in mind that Pak completely ignores continuity and doesn't care about what happened in earlier comics.

BY similar I mean he states he going all out on thing and thing is able to over power it...............

which is what hulk did.

scots stronger now, but hulk far more powerful then thing was and is.

also don't give me that F-ing tone. I likely own vastly more comics featureing cyclopes then you do.

Originally posted by llagrok
It was off during Civil War and not off during WWH. That COULD make a difference, but when he says that he's going all out, I assume he's going all out.

That makes a HUGE difference.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
That makes a HUGE difference.

I have a feeling it doesn't make any difference to Pak.

Cyclops says he's going all out against an opponent who's about to kill the Professor. Why oh why would he hold back and not go all out when he says so?

I think it should make a difference, I just don't think Pak cares.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
That makes a HUGE difference.

Originally posted by Battlehammer
yes and no. People assume when it off it more powerful but really it not. It simply wider. It a more powerful burst if the beam is smaller and he using full power then if his visor is off.

It wasn't that much wider in Civil War.

Originally posted by llagrok
I have a feeling it doesn't make any difference to Pak.

Cyclops says he's going all out against an opponent who's about to kill the Professor. Why oh why would he hold back and not go all out when he says so?

I think it should make a difference, I just don't think Pak cares.

You had been talking about how it was played down due to the lack of terrain damage. The visor focuses/directs the blast as long as he's wearing it.

Originally posted by llagrok
It wasn't that much wider in Civil War.

Originally posted by llagrok
It wasn't that much wider in Civil War.

Originally posted by Battlehammer
LOls i rn't reding up on mah civil war.

reread it.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
You had been talking about how it was played down due to the lack of terrain damage. The visor focuses/directs the blast as long as he's wearing it.

Originally posted by strengthkills
I think it was,If we are talking about the same issue,I remember cyclops taking off his visor and the whole page was red.
Pak doesnt ignore continuity at all,WWH is an entirely new character.

That was NOT Civil war you idiot, keep track of your comics.

Originally posted by strengthkills
I know.....but it is llagrok.

Shut up fanboy. You claimed that Hulk could become strong enough to hurt LT.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
You had been talking about how it was played down due to the lack of terrain damage. The visor focuses/directs the blast as long as he's wearing it.

Okay, there shouldn't have been more terrain damage. It was still the crappiest depiction of Cyclops going all out since the 80s.