World war hulk

Started by Badabing209 pages

Originally posted by llagrok
That was NOT Civil war you idiot, keep track of your comics.

Shut up fanboy. You claimed that Hulk could become strong enough to hurt LT.

😆 😆

why was it crapy depiction of scot going all out? There was nothing wrong with it. He shots f-ing beams out his eyes there no much mroe to depicted lol

Originally posted by llagrok
Okay, there shouldn't have been more terrain damage. It was still the crappiest depiction of Cyclops going all out since the 80s.

How so? He had every reason to go all out and there was no reason the blast would work anyway.

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
How so? He had every reason to go all out and there was no reason the blast would work anyway.

ya seeing as how he just took a scream by BB

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
How so? He had every reason to go all out and there was no reason the blast would work anyway.

Did you read what I said? No, apparently you didn't.

I think that he should've gone all out, but if he truly did go all out wouldn't that mean taking his visor off? You said that if was a huge difference, now if you know it, shouldn't Scott know it?

Originally posted by llagrok
Did you read what I said? No, apparently you didn't.

I think that he should've gone all out, but if he truly did go all out wouldn't that mean taking his visor off? You said that if was a huge difference, now if you know it, shouldn't Scott know it?

Talk about grasping at straws.

He wasn't played down then. He just made a mistake (that or he didn't want to kill everyone)

Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
Talk about grasping at straws.

He wasn't played down then. He just made a mistake (that or he didn't want to kill everyone)

But in Civil War he was able to direct his blast and didn't affect everyone around him?

At least not in the same way as it did in Astonishing x-men

Or maybe taking off the visor is not more powerful...........any one ever think of that?

The smaller the beam the more concentrated meaning it is the more powerful blast. Taking off the visor would have made the blast bigger and larger, but far less damaging.

llagor for being a cyclopes fanboy. You really lack some basic knowledge of his powers.

Originally posted by Battlehammer
Or maybe taking off the visor is not more powerful...........any one ever think of that?

The smaller the beam the more concentrated meaning it is the more powerful blast. Taking off the visor would have made them dam far larger, but far less damaging.

llagor for being a cyclopes fanboy. You really lack some basic knowledge of his powers.

"Cylcopses"

Gee aren't you an idiot.

I'm simply comparing two showings with his Pak showing.

Originally posted by llagrok
"Cylcopses"

Gee aren't you an idiot.


Look at what you just quoted and then rethink what you posted.

Originally posted by llagrok
"I'm simply comparing two showings with his Pak showing.

No what your doing is whining and trying to say cyclopes was not using full power even though it was stated. Your also showing to not have basic knowledge of scots powers.

Smaller beams are more concentrated. Taking off the visor would have been a very stupid move.

Originally posted by Battlehammer
Look at what you just quoted and then rethink what you posted.

No what your doing is whining and trying to say cyclopes was not using full power even though it was stated. Your also showing to not have basic knowledge of scots powers.

Smaller beams are more concentrated. Taking off the visor would have been a very stupid move.

No you ignoramus.

I'm saying that his depiction of full power was incredibly low and poor compared to his Civil War depiction of full power.

Originally posted by llagrok
That was NOT Civil war you idiot, keep track of your comics.

Shut up fanboy. You claimed that Hulk could become strong enough to hurt LT.

Okay, there shouldn't have been more terrain damage. It was still the crappiest depiction of Cyclops going all out since the 80s.

All Right you Lame,I know all about the comics your talking about X-men#3 and 4 tie-ins of civil war.Now again your gossiping and spreading lies, when have I ever said Hulk could become as strong as LT in a straight up Battle ,never,but I guess its in your Fruity nature to gossip and talk out of your ass.
I have never seen a know-it-all who doesnt know shit,its rediculous,you NEVER know what you are talking about when it comes to hulk,you accept your opinion over the writers and do NOT accept Comic-Book evidence in a Comic-Book related forum. And Low and Behold today is no different...you are still talking out of your ass,I mean hulk takes a whisper from BB and there is no way he can take Cyclops (in Visor) max.So in all you are a dumb b****.

Originally posted by llagrok
No you ignoramus.

I'm saying that his depiction of full power was incredibly low and poor compared to his Civil War depiction of full power.


why? Give me a good reason. Your reasoing thusfar has been pethetic.

Your basing every thing off the civil war arc? Civil war arc sucked balls. I am surprized I even got it. It was one of the worst x-men arcs of all time in my opinion.

Originally posted by llagrok
But in Civil War he was able to direct his blast and didn't affect everyone around him?

At least not in the same way as it did in Astonishing x-men

And then in another issue he let it all go and the whole panel was red, like I told your uninformed ass earlier.

Originally posted by strengthkills
And then in another issue he let it all go and the whole panel was red, like I told your uninformed ass earlier.

No.

I am not uninformed.

Cyclops didn't say he was going all out, he simply took off his visor. You thought it happened in Civil War. The "other issue" that I was referring to was Astonishing X-men, where the whole screen went red. Just after he told Colossus and Wolvie to get behind him.

Originally posted by Battlehammer
why? Give me a good reason. Your reasoing thusfar has been pethetic.

Your basing every thing off the civil war arc? Civil war arc sucked balls. I am surprized I even got it. It was one of the worst x-men arcs of all time in my opinion.

Give you a good reason to do what?

You can't compare the two comics? 😱

duryoda

Originally posted by llagrok
Give you a good reason to do what?

You can't compare the two comics? 😱

lol.

Dude you lost. You can't even argue your point well. Your trying to say cyclopes was not using full power even though he stated it simply because you dislike the fact hulk over powered it which other heavy hitters much weaker then hulk have done.

Originally posted by Battlehammer
lol.

Dude you lost. You can't even argue your point well. Your trying to say cyclopes was not using full power even though he stated it simply because you dislike the fact hulk over powered it which other heavy hitters much weaker then hulk have done.

READ MY GOD DAMN POSTS.

I said that it was a poor depiction, is that the same as saying he wasn't using full power?

Originally posted by llagrok
No.

I am not uninformed.

Cyclops didn't say he was going all out, he simply took off his visor. You thought it happened in Civil War.

I have the comic on my favorites right now.
In another issue Cyclops went all out and took off his glasses to destroy a sentinel and the whole panel was red,but lets just ignore that for llagrok,so he can finally win an argument. 🙄