Question for those who claim Hudlin is racist

Started by Bada's Palin30 pages
Originally posted by Juntai
I agree to an extent, however the difference is in choice.

You're right, choice is what matters in the end, I just felt like tossing that out there.

I'm not going to go all "But to what extent are we free to choose" because then we'll be here 'till the cows come home 😄

WW2 the Japaneeses were racest as hell

US was to, but people tend to overlook how bad they wore racistly.

Wierd fact, but it true. The German did not come up with steralization them selfs they took it from the US who ahd been using it for a few years before the war started.

Originally posted by Battlehammer
I Voted For Mcain .

facepalm

Did any African American state the would vote for Mcain on antional tv?

Originally posted by Battlehammer
Did any African American state the would vote for Mcain on antional tv?

Yeah, Jason.

"I wanna give a shout out to jamal, and McCain has my vote. If I squint, he looks like the KFC general"

Originally posted by Bada's Palin
Yeah, Jason.

"I wanna give a shout out to jamal, and McCain has my vote. If I squint, he looks like the KFC general"


uhuh

Originally posted by Bada's Palin
Yeah, Jason.

"I wanna give a shout out to jamal, and McCain has my vote. If I squint, he looks like the KFC general"


lol

Did he do the point to from the comercial you got money

Originally posted by Battlehammer
WW2 the Japaneeses were racest as hell

That's true. Obviously nothing justifies the atrocities that were committed in World War Two but if we were to look at the current mentality in Japan in regards to racism and xenophobia ideas such as a pure blood super race still exist among quite a significant part of its inhabitants.

yup they killed people in even worses fashion then the germans.

Originally posted by Juntai
True.
More-over, the Africans were known for keeping white slaves. And had been known too the way from when that corner of the world was Epyptian dominated, until nearly the turn of the 19th century. Perhaps beyond if I cared to study any more about it.

To me though, the race deal because of slavery is a farce, slavery happened because rich people thought they owned poor people, and could trade them like property.

Yeah some Africans did actually have white slaves but not to the extent that white people had black slaves. Maybe at certain times in history there were more Africans with white slaves but im talking aout the time of the Trans Atlantic Slave Trade.

Also you need to take into account that the African idea of slavery is different to the European one. Africans were muslims and slaves had rights not all of them knew that the slaves they dold were going to be treated so badly.

Just adding my 2cents.

Originally posted by Battlehammer
I Voted For Mcain .

you make my day sometimes.

also, PZ, thank you for clarifying your stance on the irish. we appreciate a little nod to our people's hardships every now and then.

Yeah! leave the Irish alone. I like Bono and House of Pain. YEAH!

Originally posted by ExodusCloak
That's true. Obviously nothing justifies the atrocities that were committed in World War Two but if we were to look at the current mentality in Japan in regards to racism and xenophobia ideas such as a pure blood super race still exist among quite a significant part of its inhabitants.

ExodusCloak is right. The Japanese committed some horrible crimes to the Chinese during the Manchurian occupation. However, the xenophobia is most likely fading...Japan is been open to western culture more than before. Heck! even the Xbox 360 is proof of that....

Unit 731 anyone?

Originally posted by Phantom Zone
Yeah some Africans did actually have white slaves but not to the extent that white people had black slaves. Maybe at certain times in history there were more Africans with white slaves but im talking aout the time of the Trans Atlantic Slave Trade.

Just becuases it did not happen during that time does not make it not as valid?

oh and you know that 95% of the slaves they estimatee were caught by other africans and sold.

and and most africans at the time inslaved other tribes

Originally posted by Phantom Zone
Also you need to take into account that the African idea of slavery is different to the European one. Africans were muslims and slaves had rights not all of them knew that the slaves they dold were going to be treated so badly.

no they werent. The majority of african at the time was not muslim they were local religions regional and they all inslaved one another and many times traieted them worses then any eurpean would

also African slaves did not have it the worst out of inslaved individuals they had it better the a lot of other culutre did.

i

I my mistake they were lol I not sure what I was think I got my religions messed up

soooo, is this thread about hudlin anymore?

Originally posted by Battlehammer
oh and you know that 95% of the slaves they estimatee were caught by other africans and sold.

Where are you getting these stats from?

Originally posted by Battlehammer
and and most africans at the time inslaved other tribes

These were different types of slavery. For example, When Muslims enslaved those they conquered the slaves had rights and had the ability to buy their freedom. In other nations, Mesopotamia for example, an individual can become a slave by not being able to pay back his or her debt.

Originally posted by Battlehammer
no they werent. The majority of african at the time was not muslim they were local religions regional and they all inslaved one another and many times traieted them worses then any eurpean would

East Africa had a high Muslim population, West Africa did not. Also, do you have any idea how African slaves were treated by European slave owners? ermm

Originally posted by Battlehammer
also African slaves did not have it the worst out of inslaved individuals they had it better the a lot of other culutre did.

Capt... 😬

Originally posted by Battlehammer
Just becuases it did not happen during that time does not make it not as valid?

oh and you know that 95% of the slaves they estimatee were caught by other africans and sold.

and and most africans at the time inslaved other tribes

no they werent. The majority of african at the time was not muslim they were local religions regional and they all inslaved one another and many times traieted them worses then any eurpean would

also African slaves did not have it the worst out of inslaved individuals they had it better the a lot of other culutre did.

i

The "slavery" between tribes in Africa was vastly different from the sort that went on between Africans and europeans. Vastly different.And i really dont know what u mean by they treated one another worse than any european would cuz that is just false.

Originally posted by Battlehammer
WW2 the Japaneeses were racest as hell

US was to, but people tend to overlook how bad they wore racistly.

Well the general reason so much focus is placed on the US is that at the time they were the ones supposedly championing the cause of liberty, demcracy and equality while blatantly violating those same principles within their own borders.