Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
So then you really have nothing against religion, just against blind faith?
I have something against the blind faith that religion inspires.
Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
Nothing about the text ever changes except interpretations. The same is true of any written text.
I'm not going to debate you on the semantics of this point. The original meaning gets lost when scripture gets used as the flag for dehumanizing. The same is true of any written text.
Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
People can question religion, I'm not sure where you got the idea that you can't.
And yet people are generally far less willing to question religion, and religion doesn't achieve progress through self questioning, which was clearly the original point of what I stated.
Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
You oppose religion because it can lead (and has led) to despicable acts. To not oppose science on the same grounds is a double standard at the very best.
Where did I say that I oppose religion and don't oppose science? I don't believe they're comparable, and am only making statements based on religion, so to accuse me of hypocrisy is entirely baseless.