Canada disgraces itself on the enviroment.

Originally posted by Starhawk (on page 13)
Actually we are taking tax law next semester in the fall, I am going to propose my idea to the class and see what the general opinion on it is.

Originally posted by Starhawk (on page 6)
No only for the rich I'm afraid and we have studied tax laws in class , i can't believe how much they can write off.

You fail so miserably... That's what happens though when you compound a lie with another lie, with another lie...

But please, do tell us about these "loopholes".

Originally posted by Starhawk
LOL and here I was told it would be unpopular.

As to what has been said in the last few points, that has all been covered already.

No not really, as you still haven't shown me any prove that the leading scientists in the world all agree with the idea that global warming is something humans caused and can work to prevent.

We have studied almost every kind of law, but we have not gone into in-depth study on all of them. You know there is grown up ways to ask for clarification as well.

Originally posted by Fishy
No not really, as you still haven't shown me any prove that the leading scientists in the world all agree with the idea that global warming is something humans caused and can work to prevent.

Don't you remember, on page 3 he stated that even President Bush agreed that global warming was real and humans are the cause. He promised Chithappens he show him the quote(proof) when asked; as usual though, he did not.

Originally posted by Starhawk
We have studied almost every kind of law, but we have not gone into in-depth study on all of them. You know there is grown up ways to ask for clarification as well.

Yeah, yeah, yeah... You studied everything, super.

As in "Please show proof", which has been asked of you on basically every claim you've made, and true to form, you never provide any.

No I simply got distracted arguing with you over petty minutia.

Originally posted by Robtard
Don't you remember, on page 3 he stated that even President Bush agreed that global warming was real and humans are the cause. He promised Chithappens he show him the quote(proof) when asked; as usual though, he did not.

Oh I forgot about that, but that certainly proves he's right....

Originally posted by Starhawk
No I simply got distracted arguing with you over petty minutia.

Then post it now

Originally posted by Starhawk
No I simply got distracted arguing with you over petty minutia.

It's not just me, you do this to everyone who asks you to substantiate your claims...

But:

Originally posted by Fishy

Then post it now

Don't worry, I will find it and make sure he sees it.

Originally posted by Starhawk
Don't worry, I will find it and make sure he sees it.

LOL... surprise, surprise, another spin (as in it's not just that one time, you done this to everyone with all of your claims) and another dodge...

No just an argument that does not support your views.

Originally posted by Robtard
Don't you remember, on page 3 he stated that even President Bush agreed that global warming was real and humans are the cause. He promised Chithappens he show him the quote(proof) when asked; as usual though, he did not.

Damn I had forgotten all about that LOL

Me too LOL. Sorry about that Chit I really do apologize, I will find that for you.

Originally posted by Starhawk
No I simply got distracted arguing with you over petty minutia.

Originally posted by Starhawk
No just an argument that does not support your views.

Originally posted by Robtard
It's not just me, you do this to everyone who asks you to substantiate your claims...

I'm not making an argument, I am merely stating the obvious, you fail to validate your claims; you either just spin and dodge when questioned too, or you say something like "I'll get that for you" and just wait until it his been forgotten.

Edit: I don't want you to whine anymore than is necessary.

Originally posted by Starhawk
No I simply got distracted arguing with you over petty minutia.

Asking you to support your claims with facts and/or sound logic isn't a 'little detail' in a debate. Duh.

Well I'm not going to be hard on someone right now.
I have exams this week and it is Hell right now

I know your not making an argument, believe me.

I was referring to myself making an argument as anyone with the most simplistic grasp of the english language could read.

Originally posted by Starhawk
No allot of them are business loopholes, allowing them to write off expenses.

Originally posted by Starhawk
I know your not making an argument, believe me.

I was referring to myself making an argument as anyone with the most simplistic grasp of the english language could read.

*sigh*... and an argument has to be backed up with facts and/or sound logic in the very least to work in a debate, otherwise it's just mindless rants. Duh. 'Spin away Merrill, spin away...'

Originally posted by Nellinator
Yes, they are expenses. The self-employed take major risks and they get to reap the benefits of it. And you want to take that away? Your proposed "eliminating the loopholes" would effectively shut down all entrepeneurs (spelling?) as starting a business would be nearly impossible. What do you think that would do to the economy? Absolutely destroy it, is what.

There is a spellcheck function. And I have a friends who runs his own comic shop he can't afford to fire an expensive accountant so he doesn't know about allot of the loopsholes he has access to and he still has a decent profit margin.