Ok.
I just thought that their personalities would have at least some impact on the outcomes of the fight.
Either way, it says who "can" beat Superman in this situation.
Thor can.
Arguing who wins the majority etc. is an entire different situation....
Anyways, thank you for clearing it up Raoul.
I unfortunately did not read "all" of the rules when I joined. My bad....
😠
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
KMC rules, ok then...How am I making Superman fight like a dummy, when I am applying the same situation to Thor and I am taking into account both of their abilities and personalities?
You are portraying Superman and Thor completely out of character.
I am being fair.
You're acting like without some plot device etc. like Kryptonite, Thor cannot win, which is not the case.
Thor "can" win in this situation, and that's what the thread asked for. For a character who can win, win, not take the majority etc. Simple as that.
I could argue the majority if I wanted but it is pointless and I wouldn't believe myself either way.
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
A fight is one thing, but it never said either Thor or Superman were blood lusted.Either way, Raoul cleared it up.
Thor can win as can other characters in this situation against Superman.
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Ok.I just thought that their personalities would have at least some impact on the outcomes of the fight.
Either way, it says who "can" beat Superman in this situation.
Thor can.
Arguing who wins the majority etc. is an entire different situation....
Anyways, thank you for clearing it up Raoul.
I unfortunately did not read "all" of the rules when I joined. My bad....
😠
it's not in the rules, lol...
its just something i've had to think about in the past. a superman v thor fight with both of them completely in character would have very little fighting involved lol...
Originally posted by Raoul
it's not in the rules, lol...its just something i've had to think about in the past. a superman v thor fight with both of them completely in character would have very little fighting involved lol...
Oh lol...
True, true, it's just I assumed this is a situation where they simply fight, but under the right circumstances either can win.
Either way, we are a bit of topic.
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
I already addressed this earlier in this exact same thread I believe.You are assuming, Superman has some idea what Thor is doing and Superman isn't exactly known for rushing head first and attacking beings he has never meet.
Not at all like Clark.
The same disadvantage is in play for Thor. He does not go to the extreme and has no idea what powers Clark.
If the two meet in the Sun, I highly doubt they would fight unless their is some plot involved where they have been lied to etc.
In that case, if Superman speed blitz Thor, he should win, as even Thor can only take so much of a beating from a seriously amped Superman.
You give Thor some knowledge on Superman, state that he is an evil master mind etc. and he could beat Superman in seconds, as he is versatile and powerful enough to accomplish this.
You give Clark the same conditions etc. and he to could speed blitz Thor, second after second with his power boost.
If the two meet, it would depend on who would try and end it.
Either way, like I said, this thread is who can beat a Sun-Dipped Superman in the Sun, and not who would win the majority.
Thor "can" win. That's enough for me.
It's in Supes element, very few would be able to compete IMO.
Originally posted by The Great Galen
It's in Supes element, very few would be able to compete IMO.
In a going all out fist fight, without holding back? T
hat is true but Thor is versatile and powerful enough that even though in this environment, Superman does have the physical advantage, Thor "can" still win.
That is simply my point. All the thread make asked, is who "can" win and not who "would" in a certain situation.