Poor people should not have children.

Originally posted by Schecter
a sound solution.
but the real question is how to exterminate them.

*waits for german wisdom*

Say you will give all blacks their own state and then bomb it.

That's why I said **** that "back to Africa" movement. It was a set up! 😆

Originally posted by FistOfThe North
No. It's not just logical.

Yes. The bigger goal is to have less crime. You're right. However you're dead wrong with the idea of trying to wipe out the entire black race in this situation, as much as a certain group of Americans want this.

So let me ask you this. Statistically, who commits more crime. Poor black males or poor people overall?

We both know it's poor people overall. therefore they should be the primary target of eugenics. That's what logical.

Originally posted by chithappens
Please do not insult everyone's intelligence by talking about margin of error. That is a "duh" thing to say.

The 20 years I would receive is a "mandatory" minimum. Public, private, whatever defender can not save anyone from that. "Getting off" is not only about your lawyer.

There are lot of mandatory minimums that do not make sense and are blantly racist and financially bias like possession of cocaine gets a larger mandatory minimum than say rape. Silly indeed.

Then i don't want to hear about oxymorons like accurate statistics. And getting off is not about your lawyers and money. So?

And the mandatory minimum for cocaine possession is larger than the mandatory minimum for rape? I've never heard of this.

Originally posted by chithappens
Say you will give all blacks their own state and then bomb it.

That's why I said **** that "back to Africa" movement. It was a set up! 😆

tell them that there's free malt liquer at the bottom of the ocean, then just wait.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Since it is a sub set of poor people overall I would say that is logical.

But you have to start somewhere, and the blacks are statistically the majority, so, lets just wipe them out to begin with your very good plan.

You do have to start somewhere and i know Whites would love to start with wiping out Blacks first but it's more intricate than that. Where it should start is in places where there are rates of high poverty in connection with high crime rates. Be it Hispanic, Blacks, Whites. Asians Martians. Yes, even the "small percentage" of poor Whites would "be paid a visit."

Originally posted by FistOfThe North
You do have to start somewhere and i know Whites would love to start with wiping out Blacks first but it's more intricate than that. Where it should start is in places where there are rates of high poverty in connection with high crime rates. Be it Hispanic, Blacks, Whites. Asians Martians. Yes, even the "small percentage" of poor Whites would "be paid a visit."

Sounds even more reasonable. I like your approach. When do we start?

Originally posted by Schecter
a sound solution.
but the real question is how to exterminate them.

*waits for german wisdom*

You could continue with hanging or dirt dragging. But we want to keep "the visits" as painless as possible.

Originally posted by FistOfThe North
You could continue with hanging or dirt dragging. But we want to keep "the visits" as painless as possible.

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
I didn't say the entire black race. Just forced sterilization of the poor black males. Then poor Hispanic males. Then poor white males. Prioritizing. Pragmatic. Logical. 313

No. It's just plain dumb.

Why not do it across the board. The poor are all of one unit. Crime and poverty is not a racial thing. How can the color of ones skin make them want to rob a bank.

Can you imagine a White guy thinking or saying: My skin is White. That means the cells in the pigmentation in my skin tissue will somehow travel up my spinal cord and into my brain, influencing it and making me want to commit a crime. Damn pigmentation cells. They made me want to steal money cause the somehow make it into my frontal lobe.

lol. C'mon.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Also fast. And energy efficent.

It'll be for the greater good. Just imagine it. The outcome, meaning.

Originally posted by FistOfThe North
It'll be for the greater good. Just imagine it. The outcome, meaning.

Originally posted by FistOfThe North
No. It's just plain dumb.

Why not do it across the board. The poor are all of one unit. Crime and poverty is not a racial thing. How can the color of ones skin make them want to rob a bank.

Can you imagine a White guy thinking or saying: My skin is White. That means the cells in the pigmentation in my skin tissue will somehow travel up my spinal cord and into my brain, influencing it and making me want to commit a crime. Damn pigmentation cells. They made me want to steal money cause the somehow make it into my frontal lobe.

lol. C'mon.

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
Limited resources warrant prioritizing. I didn't say it was causative. It is however correlative - and of course correlation is apparently enough to warrant forced sterilization of groups of people preemptively - as the statistics posted indicate the group most likely to commit crime are poor black males, they should be of the greatest priority. Then Hispanics. Then whites. doped

Of course a huge benefit is here is that we can use the white group to kill the black group, as the majority of racists are also poor. Maybe the racist one's will die in the progress saving you work when you want to kill the rest of the whites later on.

Originally posted by Fishy
Of course a huge benefit is here is that we can use the white group to kill the black group, as the majority of racists are also poor. Maybe the racist one's will die in the progress saving you work when you want to kill the rest of the whites later on.

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
Limited resources warrant prioritizing. I didn't say it was causative. It is however correlative - and of course correlation is apparently enough to warrant forced sterilization of groups of people preemptively - as the statistics posted indicate the group most likely to commit crime are poor black males, they should be of the greatest priority. Then Hispanics. Then whites. doped

Fair enough. As long as all whom qualify become "treated".

Originally posted by FistOfThe North
One of the biggest problems in this world is bringing other humans into it because it seem like the natural thing to do. But no one ever looks at the repercussions of being poor and having children.

Not that I'm poor, i don't even have children yet but if i were poor i'd think about how i'm gonna raise a child and the expenditures that come with it. Not because it's a beautiful thing to have kids.

the inner city are loaded with children of this kind. With parents who had kids on a whim, who weren't planning on having kids or were neither ready mentally to deal with one (or 2 or3), for years to come resulting in kids getting neglected and turning out fcuked..

So what i'm saying is: Poor People of the World!. Stop Having Kids If you can't afford 'em!

But what do poor single mothers care right? I mean, the gov't will take half of what i earn every week and give it to them, right. Everything's in it for them..

Sucks..

Originally posted by Schecter
tell them that there's free malt liquer at the bottom of the ocean, then just wait.

😆 I couldn't help but giggle

I'm still wondering why he keeps making this an issue simply of the individual instead of counting it as a social issue.

Saying it is the fault of the individual alone is just oversimplifying everything

Originally posted by chithappens
I'm still wondering why he keeps making this an issue simply of the individual instead of counting it as a social issue.

Saying it is the fault of the individual alone is just oversimplifying everything

Here you go again with your incoherences. Who said I was targeting an individual. Didn't I write "the poor, as a whole"? I'd go after the group.

Who said anything about individualism.

so lets target blacks....as a whole