Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
Must have been a pretty pathetic universe 馃槵
Just another Universe. 馃槵
Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
A BigBang would contain all the energy of a universe. A blast like that should have literally taken out the entire universe.
It was used as a direct beam, not an all encompassing blast.
Originally posted by Endless Mike
Yes but he said it was a baby universe, so the Big Bang was much smaller than an average one
It was only a baby Universe cause it hadn't had it's First Big Bang yet.
Reed never said it was a pocket Universe,
but a Universe in the Multiversal Stack.
Every Universe in the Multiverse goes through a Big Bang at some point, some Universes have already reached that climax, others have not, hence the "baby" universe term.
Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
Which makes the feat useless.All we can say about that bomb is:
TsarBomba << Reed's Bomb << A normal BigBang
I disagree.
Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
Then why did you use the word BOMB
My bad. 馃檨
Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
OK that changes the feat immensely then.
I just flipped some pages and realized it was an actual Big Bang.
It was the Big Bang that atually creates a Universe.
So it wasn't a Universe as I thought that hadn't reached it's Big Bang, (in terms of recycling) but instead it was a vast area of Space filled with the Gases that explode into a full blown New Universe.
This area of Space was located deep in the Multiverse,
where Universes/Gases are still waiting to Big Bang into adulthood.
Originally posted by Symmetric Chaos
A directed energy weapon with a huge amount of energy is in no way similar to a blast with the same energy.
What's the difference if the source of energy is the same?