Gah Lak Tus versus Galactus

Started by Mr Master6 pages
Originally posted by Utrigita
And why is it that it isn't true ???

Cause it isn't.

If you have any kind of proof,

do show or tell.

Originally posted by Utrigita
It can just as well be the alternate version.

No it could not.

It was the Big Bang of a young Universe, nothing more,

which had absolutely nothing to do with the UN, in any way.

This is kinda funny actually,

you're forcing yourself to believe it is or Could've been the Ultimate Universe's UN,

when On Panel Reed used the biggest H-Bomb to set off a Big Bang prematurely.

UN?

UN what?

So you think the UN might've been the premature Big Bang,

or the H-Bomb used to initiate it?

Originally posted by Utrigita
You are comparing the UN that can erase and remake Multiverses with my alternate version of the UN.

I'm not comparing any UN,

I Know that wasn't the UN, or any kind of UN,

not now not ever.

Originally posted by Utrigita
Again I am only speculating that it, given a little thought and speculation, must have been the alternate universes version of the UN.

I agree, you're speculating aimlessly.

"must have been the AU version of the UN"

Is an unsupported overstatement.

But if you have proof that just hints to this being a reality,

I'll concede.

But you should concede to what I'm saying if you don't have any,

especially considering that what I'm saying is straight from the Comic,

as it happened On Panel.

Originally posted by Galan007
I agree.

The big bang gun could absolutely be the Ultimate Universes version of the UN.

No chance.

Originally posted by Galan007
[Again, I'm not comparing power or role.... Just the term].

Still, no chance. 馃檪

Originally posted by Mr Master
No chance.

Still, no chance.

In your opinion. 馃檪

Originally posted by Galan007
In your opinion.

In Marvel's actually, and more specifically in Ultimate Extinction's

I presented the On Panel evidence of what occured and what was used against Gah Lak Tus,

if you can disprove the On Panel proof, by all means, do so.

Not with an opinion like my scans straight from the Comic book. 馃檮

But with facts from ... well I don't know a better source than the issue itself but,

you'l figure it out. 馃槒

Originally posted by Mr Master
In Marvel's actually, and more specifically in Ultimate Extinction's

I presented the On Panel evidence of what occured and what was used against Gah Lak Tus,

if you can disprove the On Panel proof, by all means, do so.

Not with an opinion like my scans straight from the Comic book. 馃檮

But with facts from ... well I don't know a better source than the issue itself but,

you'l figure it out. 馃槒

Point out to me where I said the big bang gun was referred to as the UN. 馃槙

I'll save you the time looking, because I didn't say anything of the sort.

I merely remarked that I could definitely agree with the gun being seen as the "ultimate" version of the UN. 馃槈

Originally posted by Galan007
Point out to me where I said the big bang gun was referred to as the UN.

UT said:

Originally posted by Utrigita
Again I am only speculating that it, given a little thought and speculation,

must have been the alternate universes version of the UN.

You respond:

Originally posted by Galan007
I agree.

The big bang gun could absolutely be the Ultimate Universes version of the UN.

[Again, I'm not comparing power or role.... Just the term].

My reply:

"No chance" (in terms of power, role or Term)

You then come back with:

Originally posted by Galan007
In your opinion.

So this must mean you really believe the Big Bang in some way (whatever it may be)

resembles the UN or is the Ultimate Universe's UN.

Which isn't a reality no matter how we put it.

Originally posted by Galan007
I merely remarked that I could definitely agree with the gun being seen as the "ultimate" version of the UN.

It wasn't a gun or a Big Bang gun btw,

it was the biggest H-bomb on Earth sent to a baby Universe, the Bomb was set off in that Universe, igniting it's Big Bang, then through the same portal the H-bomb was sent which was opened from that Universe to the Ultimate Universe, the Big Bang explosion was directed at GLT.

Now,

if you wish to see that as the anything similar to the UN, fine.

But for the record, it had nothing to do with any kind of UN, and in fact,

it did not resemble the UN in any way either.

Originally posted by grey fox
But it sucks. Badly. 馃槓

I just typed in "Galactus Gah Lak" and got this immediately.

Originally posted by Mr Master
UT said:

You respond:

My reply:

"No chance" (in terms of power, role or Term)

You then come back with:

So this must mean you really believe the Big Bang in some way (whatever it may be)

resembles the UN or is the Ultimate Universe's UN.

Did you miss the part where I said "could"?

Here it is:

Originally posted by Galan007
I agree.

The big bang gun could absolutely be the Ultimate Universes version of the UN.

[Again, I'm not comparing power or role.... Just the term].

Sorry to disappoint, but I never said they were the same thing, or even close to the same thing.

Just that I "could" see the big bang weapon titled as the UN. 馃檪

Originally posted by Mr Master
Now,

if you wish to see that as the anything similar to the UN, fine.

I said,

I "could" see it that way. 馃槈

Originally posted by Mr Master
it did not resemble the UN in any way either.
Appearance has nothing to do with this.

Nor does overall power.

Nor does role in the Universe.

Just the term. 馃檪

Originally posted by Galan007
Did you miss the part where I said "could"?

I know you said that friend,

and I said still no chance.

That's what I meant, that no matter what, it is not the UN in any form,

that it "could" never be.

Originally posted by Galan007
Just that I "could" see the big bang weapon titled as the UN.
I said,

I "could" see it that way.

So it's an observation based on a personal view.

So why didn't ya just say that. 馃槢

Originally posted by Galan007
Appearance has nothing to do with this.

"In any way" not just appearance.

But I got where you're coming from. 馃檪

Originally posted by Mr Master
So it's an observation based on a personal view.

So why didn't ya just say that. 馃槢

Exactly.

Never said it was called that, never said they were comparable what so ever, just said I saw how the big bang weapon could be viewed as a UN of sorts 馃檪

given how the ult. marvelverse changes around things, (case in point: Gah Lak Tus, ult. Sinister, Green Goblin, etc) it's not outside the realm of possibility that the 'big bang' gun is the ultimate universe version of the UN. After all, everything seems to be weaker in the ultimate marvelverse. But, Mr. Master is right that no concrete proof either way has been delivered.

As for the fight,

Nuff said. 馃槢

Originally posted by TricksterPriest
After all, everything seems to be weaker in the ultimate marvelverse.
I disagree.

Many of the "Ultimate" characters are much more powerful then their 616 counterparts.

Like? The hulk example doesn't count, Adamantium in the ult universe is weaker.

Very early I said that it was speculation on my part, and that I myself believed that the Weapon that was used against Gah Lak Thus was the alternate Version of the UN, I said nothing about power output I only remarked that IIIIIIII speculated it to be there version of the UN, Now if you are finding that downright wrong that is your openion but you have no concrete evidence that can support you saying that it for 100% certainty wasn't there version of the UN.

I think this Gun may be a "Homage" to the UN.

Originally posted by Utrigita
Now if you are finding that downright wrong that is your openion but you have no concrete evidence that can support you saying that it for 100% certainty wasn't there version of the UN.

As you wish. 馃檪

Originally posted by King Kandy
I think this Gun may be a "Homage" to the UN.

What Gun?

Didn't what to search on Google for it any longer so just wrote the writer a letter (that would be Warren)

From: <[email protected]>
Sendt : 18. maj 2007 22:59:19
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: The Ultimate Extinction a simple question

In a message dated 18/05/2007 21:35:31 GMT Standard Time, [email protected] writes:

(question)
I claim that you
meant for that Gun to be the alternate version of the classic ultimate
nullifier,
(answer)
Yes.

Will just fast it forward to you Mr Master

Okay I couldn't you have blocked it, can you send me your Email over a PM then I will just fast it forward to you

( I just love being right 馃槃 )

I've also seen ellis confirming that he meant it to be an homage of sorts to the ultimate nullifier.

however there's also talk that ultimate thanos is having ultimate reed build an actual "ultimate" ultimate nullifier.

Galactus vs. Gah Lak Tus
Hunger #1
1. http://i80.photobucket.com/albums/j165/A_Flight10/Hunger2013-001-015_zps131bc95b.jpg
2. http://i80.photobucket.com/albums/j165/A_Flight10/Hunger2013-001-016_zpsbc2f0165.jpg
3. http://i80.photobucket.com/albums/j165/A_Flight10/Hunger2013-001-017_zpse18ccda9.jpg
4. http://i80.photobucket.com/albums/j165/A_Flight10/Hunger2013-001-018_zps860ff8e8.jpg