Originally posted by grey fox
What Utrigita is trying to say is that he believes the 'Big Bang Gun' to be the Ultimate version of the Ultimate Nullifier.He is correct.
Where is this stated?
Is this from another issue?
Cause the Big Bang Reed harnessed had nothing to do with the UN,
in this particular story.
I believe it was briefly mentioned in the #5 as a weapon that in the 616 would basically have been the same as the UN therefore I concluded that it is just a alternate version of the UN, they apperantly have anything that marvel does but different, so when Gah Lak Thus is a big fat fleet of hive minded beings then the UN which in 616 is very small in comparison with Galactus just as the Canon used in the ultimate marvel is very small in comparison with Gah Lak Thus.
Originally posted by Utrigita
I believe it was briefly mentioned in the #5 as a weapon that in the 616 would basically have been the same as the UN therefore I concluded that it is just a alternate version of the UN,
I'll re-read #5 now, cause I don't recall.
Originally posted by Utrigita
they apperantly have anything that marvel does but different,
Actually they're both from the Marvel Multiverse.
While it's true Alternate Universes have differences in History and or appearance concerning characters, there are some things that just don't change.
The UN in Earth X, (Alternate Universe) exactly the same as the one in 616.
Also, the Big Bang Reed harnessed was from another Universe all together, "way up the Multiversal Stack" so how is it connected to GLT like the UN is to 616 Galactus?
By that logic in order to use the UN in this Ultimate Universe, you need to first harness a Universal Big Bang that hasn't occured yet?
I have to disagree.
I'll read #5, and see what exactly was said, and I'll post it.
Originally posted by Utrigita
so when Gah Lak Thus is a big fat fleet of hive minded beings then the UN which in 616 is very small in comparison with Galactus just as the Canon used in the ultimate marvel is very small in comparison with Gah Lak Thus.
I don't see this.
Originally posted by grey fox
See the UN is a part of Galactus , (IE : Giant human Galactus) that's why their all the same shape. BUT , because ultimate is lacking a Galactus they have their own variation upon it.
I'm half way through #5, still haven't come across the UN reference,
but I'll keep you posted.
Originally posted by Mr Master
You're right cause I just finished and there was never a mention or reference,or even an alluding to the UN.
I'm not going to go nuts on google looking for that. 馃槢
I also said that it was something that I concluded it must have been.
But you can always go tjeck out google the writers says that was the meaning of the weapon to work like the UN give me some time and I will dig it up (sooner ore later probably later)
Originally posted by Jebus reborn
It's not that hard to think about...Utrigita basically is saying, that if there was an Ultimate version of the UN, then Reed's Big Bang thing, would be the UN.
It's not that it's hard to think about, it's that it's simply not true.
The Big Bang bomb was ... well exactly that, a Big Bang bomb.
The UN is the UN.
Saying the Ultimate version of the UN is that Big Bang bomb is unsupported speculation at best.
I have to do some research concerning this Ultimate verse,
how is the Universal balance held in check there?
Is Gah Lak Tus is just some name, or is this Space armada a sibling of Eternity and Death?
Perhaps there is No UN is his Alternate Reality, after all, Alternate Universes are not identical to 616.
Originally posted by Mr MasterFrom what I gathered, Utriga isn't comparing the two power-wise.
It's not that it's hard to think about, it's that it's simply not true.The Big Bang bomb was ... well exactly that, a Big Bang bomb.
The UN is the UN.
Saying the Ultimate version of the UN is that Big Bang bomb is unsupported speculation at best.
He is just saying the big bang gun, is the Ultimate Universes version of the UN.
Originally posted by Galan007
From what I gathered, Utriga isn't comparing the two power-wise.
I never thought that.
Originally posted by Galan007
He is just saying the big bang gun, is the Ultimate Universes version of the UN.
As Big already pointed out as Utrigita has been saying, and again,
that's not true. 馃檨
The Big Bang of that Universe had absolutely nothing to do with the UN,
in anyway shape or form.
Originally posted by Mr MasterNever said that's what they called it.
As Big already pointed out as Utrigita has been saying, and again,that's not true. 馃檨
The Big Bang of that Universe had absolutely nothing to do with the UN,
in anyway shape or form.
Just said that's what it may have been comparable to. 馃槈
Originally posted by Mr Master
I never thought that.As Big already pointed out as Utrigita has been saying, and again,
that's not true. 馃檨
The Big Bang of that Universe had absolutely nothing to do with the UN,
in anyway shape or form.
And why is it that it isn't true ???
It can just as well be the alternate version.
You are comparing the UN that can erase and remake Multiverses with my alternate version of the UN.
Again I am only speculating that it, given a little thought and speculation, must have been the alternate universes version of the UN.
Originally posted by UtrigitaI agree.
And why is it that it isn't true ???It can just as well be the alternate version.
You are comparing the UN that can erase and remake Multiverses with my alternate version of the UN.
Again I am only speculating that it, given a little thought and speculation, must have been the alternate universes version of the UN.
The big bang gun could absolutely be the Ultimate Universes version of the UN.
[Again, I'm not comparing power or role.... Just the term].
