Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Bardock42
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Victor Von DoomSh-shouldn't that be 'Like "like" like'?
Not that I like you.
Hmm, probably....can't figure it out. German and all.
Though the last should be in quotation marks too....as....I quote what was said. Maybe I should signal a difference in pronunciation by other means like, 'Like, [b]like
"like"?'? [/B][/QUOTE]Originally posted by Bardock42
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
Go nuts.
Are you calling me a homosexual?
Originally posted by Schecter
poor examples/excusesthe transfat ban falls under government guidelines in restaurants not poisoning patrons, be it strychnine or synthetic cooking oil.
the restaurant/bar smoking ban concerns public health and the dangers of second hand smoke. it concerns everyone's right to not breath in someone else's toxic smoke.
there is no law banning an individual's right to cook with artificial oils, nor is there a law against consumption of tobacco, barring a health risk to others who would not welcome it.
Do you even know what trans fat is? I highly doubt it seeing how you compare it to poison. Second hand smoke is bullshit, However believing in second hand smoke you have to believe that there is consequential second hand smoke from pot. Pot is outlawed for the similar reasons because it is harmfull to ones health. I was simply trying to say that The public has no say in what the government deems legal and illegal.
In downtown pitsburgh, YES in the city you can only smoke in designated smoking areas. Now tell me how this isnt an infringment on my rights? I am smoking a wide open area where the smoke drifts away and not in an enclosed room. I can more than understand not smoking in restaurants, but outside ina city where pollution is more rampant than cigarete smoke...really now
Originally posted by ragesRemorse
Do you even know what trans fat is? I highly doubt it seeing how you compare it to poison.
transfat is artificial cooking oil, as i stated. since it is nothing but harmful to people, i call it poison. call it melodramatic if you wish, but...well thats that.
Originally posted by ragesRemorse
second hand smoke is bullshit,
how delightfully ignorant. lets just cut to the chase: reality is bullshit?
Originally posted by ragesRemorse
However believing in second hand smoke you have to believe that there is consequential second hand smoke from pot.
which is why i would accept laws forbidding the smoking of pot in public places, as i never said anything to the contrary. you should really get a decent set of points thought up which counter what i said. just a tip from your internet buddy.
Originally posted by ragesRemorse
Pot is outlawed for the similar reasons because it is harmfull to ones health.
based on what?
Originally posted by ragesRemorse
I was simply trying to say that The public has no say in what the government deems legal and illegal.
wow...you mean that, huh?
im sorry...do you live in china? here in the west he have democracies in which the people (theoretically) decide what is to be illegal.
Originally posted by ragesRemorse
In downtown pitsburgh, YES in the city you can only smoke in designated smoking areas. Now tell me how this isnt an infringment on my rights?
easy. it isnt an infringement on your rights. its the public right to not have to be nasally raped by your tobacco smoking.
i dont normally do this (pick an entire post apart sentence for sentence), and i hope you dont take it as a personal assault, but everything you said to this point is utter horseshit and you need to apply logic and fact before attemting to formulate some arguable point.
Originally posted by ragesRemorse
I am smoking a wide open area where the smoke drifts away and not in an enclosed room. I can more than understand not smoking in restaurants, but outside ina city where pollution is more rampant than cigarete smoke...really now
this part i agree with, and as a smoker it annoys me too. but there are far worse injustices.
Originally posted by Schecter
how delighfully ignorant. Lets just cut to the chase: reality is bullshit?how delightfully ignorant. lets just cut to the chase: reality is bullshit?
http://www.smokersclubinc.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=2224
This is just one of many Studies done disproving second hand smoke. So yes reality is bullshit...your reality atleast. Dont worry though, your ignorance is forgiven because studies like this are shrouded by the media's rush to have smoking banned altogether.
Originally posted by ragesRemorse
http://www.smokersclubinc.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=2224This is just one of many Studies done disproving second hand smoke. So yes reality is bullshit...your reality atleast. Dont worry though, your ignorance is forgiven because studies like this are shrouded by the media's rush to have smoking banned altogether.
Who cares whether it's real or not? The smell is enough for it be banned for some people, not to mention the litter of cigarette butts. I personally am not in favour in any way of it being banned, but a lot of people are.
Originally posted by Schecterbased on what?
.
Do you really want me to quote Healt boards and nuero scientists on how Marijuanna is harmful to ones health? I mean, i will be glad to exploit your ignorance in questioning how pot is harmful to ones health, but i assume you have more sense and accept that it is in fact distressing to the human body
Originally posted by Schectereasy. it isnt an infringement on your rights. its the public right to not have to be nasally raped by your tobacco smoking.
i dont normally do this (pick an entire post apart sentence for sentence), and i hope you dont take it as a personal assault, but everything you said to this point is utter horseshit and you need to apply logic and fact before attemting to formulate some arguable point.
So it should be my right to not be nasaly raped by your shitty cologn Which i am also allergic to? Since when do we ban things in this country because other people do not approve? I'm at a loss on why you believe my points were utter horseshit. Other than the fact that you apparently disagree with them. Was it the fact that i disagree that trans fat which is essentially margerine is not poisen?
By your logic anything that is not good for the human body is poison. Just like anything else seved at a fast food restaurant. trans fat is no more harmfull to you than the other crap that you stuff into your mouth at mcdonalds, assuming you exercise portion control.