darth maul vs general gerivous

ya that quote is in LoE it's something along the lines of maul was good but he was just a tool where as grievious is faster and better trined

Gievous's kills are tallied at 29 jedi, 1 dark jedi

i remember dooku saying that grievous was the best apprentice he'd ever trained using the 1<2<3=3>1 then in theory....

ya that quote is in LoE it's something along the lines of maul was good but he was just a tool where as grievious is faster and better trined

I know dooku never trained maul but the fact that dooku said grievous was his best apprntice means alot

grievous has killed hundreds those jedi where the only ones with names and the dark jedi was the one he killed on Dica and was rumored to have Bane's Heart: he doesnt have a name

and i dont have my copy of LoE so look it up yourself, poppunker knows wut im talking about and thats 2 to 1 and that quote puts this debate to an end as it says that grievous is better trained than maul so if u need that proof look it up

even without that proof i have proved that grievous beats him none the less as he has a higher kill count and four arms he was a ton so maul would have trouble using the Force on him and he can use six lightsabers if he wants to so im done with this endless debate

he weighs a ton?
obi wan was able to push him fairly easy, why shouldnt maul?

Originally posted by alterangel
I know dooku never trained maul but the fact that dooku said grievous was his best apprntice means alot

And if you'll look at my original post, I think that CW Grievous could beat Maul, too, and that's the reason I want the quote, so I can use it in other debates, because taking the word of one or even 2 people doesn't work without a quote. You'll find that some debators at least won't let their point go without a quote, which is why I' d like it for future reference. But whatever.

I would be happy to find the quote however it will take a while to procure a copy as i cant find mine ill try online

i went to look for the quote today then realized that i lent LoE out to a friend.......a year ago and still haven't gotten it back.

LoE is one of my very favorite books, and I recall no such comparison between Maul and Grievous. Realistically, I'd say Maul has it in an all out fight. Dooku knew that Grievous - without surprise or fear on his side - was no match for any upper level Jedi [Council-wise], whereas Maul tooled Bondara, a Jedi whose lightsaber skills were "second to none".

dooku never said anything like grievous wasnt a match for upper level jedi?!! He flippin took ki-adi-mundi who is on the council and shaak ti a jedi knight and 3 others all at the same time i doubt maul could even take ki-adi-mundi alone

Also, didn't Mace BMF Windu say that OB1 was the only who could beat him due to his form or something to that effect?

Originally posted by alterangel
i doubt maul could even take ki-adi-mundi alone

Maul will defeat Ki-Adi-Mundi without much difficulty. He was trained to be an ultimate killing machine by Sidious.

He stalemated Anoon, whose skill in Light Saber Combat was "second to none" in the entire Jedi Council of his age.

And he alone was capable of fighting with two Jedi simultaneously and still beat them.

What has Ki-Adi-Mundi done that match these feats?

Originally posted by S_W_LeGenD
[B]What are you smoking?

Maul will defeat Ki-Adi-Mundi without much difficulty. He was trained to be an ultimate killing machine by Sidious.

He stalemated Anoon, whose skill in Light Saber Combat was "second to none" in the entire Jedi Council of his age.

Ki-adi- would lose to Maul yes, but it would not be easy for him.

Originally posted by kiddo44
that quote about Anoon means nothing, and Maul was better than him.

Originally posted by Gideon
LoE is one of my very favorite books, and I recall no such comparison between Maul and Grievous. Realistically, I'd say Maul has it in an all out fight. Dooku knew that Grievous - without surprise or fear on his side - was no match for any upper level Jedi [Council-wise], whereas Maul tooled Bondara, a Jedi whose lightsaber skills were "second to none".

He sad,that if he is going to succeed, against the strongest of the Jedi he needs the elements you said(ant their are very few Jedi, that belong in this group). Not every Council Jedi is powerful, like Trebor Colman and most aren't uber powerful like Yoda, Mace...,.
I only see, Obi-Wan, Mace, Yoda, Anakin and maybe Cin Drallig(but i doubt it) defeating Grievous.
And Grievous would defeat Anon Bondara as well.
But i do agree, that Maul wins in an all out fight.

I agree with Legend for a change. Maul would eat Mundi.

Maul smoking Mundi, eh? I don't see that happening any day of the week. While I'm fairly certain that Maul would beat Mundi, it's doubtful that it would be pwnage of any sort.

Sure, if Maul didn't have lightsaber skills comparable to Sidious', most def.

Originally posted by jollyjim311
Sure, if Maul didn't have lightsaber skills comparable to Sidious', most def.

I also believe that Mundi would lose easily to Maul.

Yoda only considered him the only one able to take down Sharad Hett, because didn't know him, all the other council members, knew him, he was their great friend, Mundis feelings wouldn't get in the way, like they could for the rest of the Jedi.

And Mundi lifting that transport on Tatoine when he was fatigued and inured, i am sure, that Maul could have done that to.

Originally posted by Count Makashi
And Mundi lifting that transport on Tatoine when he was fatigued and inured, i am sure, that Maul could have done that to.