Darth Traya VS Darth Sidious

Started by Lightsnake5 pages

Originally posted by Darth_Glentract
Traya WTFpwned three Jedi Masters with a flick of her wrist. She'd give Palpatine a good fight.

If by 'good fight,' you mean 'he'd enjoy taking her limb from limb immensely'

Last I checked, Palpatine wtfpwned three of the best swordsmen the Order had ever seen in seconds. He's the most powerful Sith period, (Thanks, canon!) and can create planet wide storms and even bend the spirits of people Traya was in awe of to his will.

He wins. Hard

Originally posted by Lightsnake
If by 'good fight,' you mean 'he'd enjoy taking her limb from limb immensely'

Last I checked, Palpatine wtfpwned three of the best swordsmen the Order had ever seen in seconds. He's the most powerful Sith period, (Thanks, canon!) and can create planet wide storms and even bend the spirits of people Traya was in awe of to his will.

He wins. Hard

Get Palpatine's dick out of your mouth and use your freakin brain for a moment. Palpatine killed three strong Master's in something like 8 or 9 seconds. Traya killed three of the most powerful Jedi alive in a third that time. He BECAME the most powerful Sith. As of ROTS he's not at the top.

Originally posted by Darth_Glentract
Get Palpatine's dick out of your mouth and use your freakin brain for a moment. Palpatine killed three strong Master's in something like 8 or 9 seconds. Traya killed three of the most powerful Jedi alive in a third that time. He BECAME the most powerful Sith. As of ROTS he's not at the top.

Exactly. Besides, he's talking about a Force battle, not a lightsaber match, Lightsnake. Kreia owned the Masters in the Force, Palp owned the Master with the lightsaber.

Yes, he is, Glen:
"Yoda was unable to defeat the most powerful Sith in history."

In direct reference to him as of ROTS. What does this tell you?

Use your brain, Glentract, thanks

Give me a source.

The NEC, the Ultimate Visual Guide, the Heritage of the Sith...

Do you ignore when I give this stuff in other topics?

No, you simply hadn't posted it when I last asked for it. Since then I looked it and found no reason to believe that it was making reference to Palpaltine's fighting ability. It was instead making reference to his control over the government.

Originally posted by Darth_Glentract
Get Palpatine's dick out of your mouth and use your freakin brain for a moment. Palpatine killed three strong Master's in something like 8 or 9 seconds. Traya killed three of the most powerful Jedi alive in a third that time. He BECAME the most powerful Sith. As of ROTS he's not at the top.
Those jedi werent "The most powerful" of that time simply because they havnt done anything impressive. Kavar lost to malak and malak is only half of what sidious it,

Sidious will rape kreia and badly

Oh yes and him taking 3 good swordsman? He didnt even fight for 13 years yet he did so well

Originally posted by Darth_Glentract
No, you simply hadn't posted it when I last asked for it. Since then I looked it and found no reason to believe that it was making reference to Palpaltine's fighting ability. It was instead making reference to his control over the government.

Wow what part of THE most powerful dont you understand? It obviously means his strength, People with cow sense know what this means

It was instead making reference to his control over the government.

Prove it.

Edit: Oh, and the RotS novelization does indeed say that the men Palpatine butchered were among the most gifted swordsmen that the "Order ever produced".

But GL also called them the B League

Originally posted by Manslayer
Sidious will rape kreia and badly
Well thanks for that nice picture. I have to go soak my eyes in alcohol now.

There is no discussion here. Evidence simply goes in Palp's favour, as well as canon facts. Kreia supporters simply have nothing against him (even though there are almost none).

Originally posted by Darth_Glentract
No, you simply hadn't posted it when I last asked for it. Since then I looked it and found no reason to believe that it was making reference to Palpaltine's fighting ability. It was instead making reference to his control over the government.

Oh, give it a rest, Glentract. This is just pathetic:

The author of the source specified in an email I posted here with the Antediluvians ages back.

Power in context of a Force User? It means 'Power in the Force.'

Why it would bother mentioned Yoda failed to defeat the Most Powerful?

Hey, since you're a total hypocrite:
1. Was Traya referring to /political power/ when she said there was no POWER in Nihilus's hunger...
2. Marka Ragnos was the most POLITICALLY powerful of the most powerful
3. Qordis and Kopecz were only the most POLITICALLY powerful of the Brotherhood of Darkness

Originally posted by Lightsnake
Oh, give it a rest, Glentract. This is just pathetic:

The author of the source specified in an email I posted here with the Antediluvians ages back.

Power in context of a Force User? It means 'Power in the Force.'

Why it would bother mentioned Yoda failed to defeat the Most Powerful?

Agreed. You're grasping at straws, Glentract.

"Kreia loses, son. Just accept it."

13 people voted Traya??

yea, 13 stupid people...

Sidious no question, Traya was very good though.

Originally posted by Gideon
Prove it.

Edit: Oh, and the RotS novelization does indeed say that the men Palpatine butchered were among the most gifted swordsmen that the "Order ever produced".

It's Lightsnake's job to prove his statement before I am expected to disprove it because he was the first to make any such assertion.

And as DS pointed out, GL called them B team. Kreia took out the three top level Masters alive with a flick of her wrist.

Originally posted by Manslayer
Those jedi werent "The most powerful" of that time simply because they havnt done anything impressive.

They lead the Jedi Order. They were the best the Order had to offer. Those Sidious killed weren't nearly as high up in their respective time.

Originally posted by Manslayer
Kavar lost to malak and malak is only half of what sidious it,

Any proof of this? Kavar may have lost, but to someone of only half Sidious' strength? You're gonna need to back that up.

Originally posted by Manslayer
Oh yes and him taking 3 good swordsman? He didnt even fight for 13 years yet he did so well

Is his lack of practice with a saber supposed to chance anytime soon?

Originally posted by Manslayer
Wow what part of THE most powerful dont you understand? It obviously means his strength, People with cow sense know what this means

If it's so obvious you should have no trouble proving it.

Originally posted by Lightsnake
Oh, give it a rest, Glentract. This is just pathetic:

The author of the source specified in an email I posted here with the Antediluvians ages back.

Power in context of a Force User? It means 'Power in the Force.'

Why it would bother mentioned Yoda failed to defeat the Most Powerful?

Hey, since you're a total hypocrite:
1. Was Traya referring to /political power/ when she said there was no POWER in Nihilus's hunger...
2. Marka Ragnos was the most POLITICALLY powerful of the most powerful
3. Qordis and Kopecz were only the most POLITICALLY powerful of the Brotherhood of Darkness

Would you care to repost the email? I'm worried it might have questionable context as well.

Malak being only 50% of ROTS Sidious is riduculous, in the old days people put him on par with Dooku and nowadays people put him about on level with PoD bane (slightly less that Dooku). 80% seems more reasonable, not very close but a fight between the two wouldn't be pwnage, either, seriously, 50%? That's like further away that AOTC Anakin is to Dooku.

Just putting in my 2 cents, continue debate as planned. I don't like ROTS Sidious already being #1 in terms of fighting ability so I hope you win, Glentract (I do think he would likely beat Traya, however, by a little).