Is ANYONE in favor of Partial Birth Abortions?

Started by Alpha Centauri11 pages

Anti-life? Suppress?

There are people here who said they'd commit murder on a grown human to protect nothing more than potential and you've said that's justifiable because you BELIEVE it's "a life". You have no place calling anybody anti-life.

Throw at me all the over-gorified info you want, I still don't give a shit, I'm not shying away from, nor suppressing, anything.

-AC

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Anti-life? Suppress?

You completely missed the point of my post.
There are people here who said they'd commit murder on a grown human to protect nothing more than potential and you've said that's justifiable because you BELIEVE it's "a life".

Erm. No, I didn't. That is, in fact, a blatant lie.

I believe Ashtar asked you if you believe taking a life is necessary to save one? Presumably being aware of his WELL documented stance, you said "Yes, I do.".

-AC

Originally posted by FeceMan
"Late term abortion" just glosses over the truth that the anti-life crowd want to suppress.
And how is "partial birth" the truth?

Before all you pre-hormonal teenagers spiral wildly out of control and spiral wildly out of control with stupid an ill-formed opinoins, IDX (as this medical procedure is actuall called; PBA was a term made up by anti-abortion groups to make people think this fetus was actually being born) was a very rare procedure and is still legal in the US given that the mothers LIFE (different from HEALTH) is at risk.

So yes, I would be infavor of IDX provided that the mother's life or the fetus' life was at risk.

Originally posted by Alliance
Before all you pre-hormonal teenagers spiral wildly out of control and spiral wildly out of control with stupid an ill-formed opinoins,
Relatively pretentious... (and somewhat redundantly repetitious). 😬

Its early and hot...and I never claimed to be eloquent.

Stuff I read in here jsut makes me want to puke. This is a medical procedure, not a personal taste contest.

People will have opinions on science, medicine, and their respective ethics regardless of layperson's status with regard to science, medicine and/or their respective ethics. It's just a way of the world.

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
People will have opinions on science, medicine, and their respective ethics regardless of layperson's status with regard to science, medicine and/or their respective ethics. It's just a way of the world.

No, its not really. Unless you are endorsing uninformed opinons...

Ethics can be realtive...knowledge cannot be so.

Originally posted by Alliance
No, its not really. Unless you are endorsing uninformed opinons...
I'm not endorsing uninformed opinions, however I generally see no need to react abrasively to them when correcting them. It is a public forum, not an academic one.

Thats right...people can be idiots as long as they are expressiong their opinons publically.

Of course they should be corrected, just don't be so venomous when doing so, that's all x is saying srug

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
I believe Ashtar asked you if you believe taking a life is necessary to save one? Presumably being aware of his WELL documented stance, you said "Yes, I do.".

-AC


I believe that I have not once responded to anything Ashtar has written, save for maybe in the Religion forum. In any case, I am not for murder in any case.

Originally posted by Strangelove
Of course they should be corrected, just don't be so venomous when doing so, that's all x is saying srug

Fine then. But, the first time I posted in here and pointed something out nicely, it deterred nothing. In fact, no one even responded to the post.

Sometimes a gentle poking doesn't wake someone up.

Originally posted by FeceMan
I believe that I have not once responded to anything Ashtar has written, save for maybe in the Religion forum. In any case, I am not for murder in any case.

That is a blatant lie, but since I can't be bothered to go through the abortion pages, i'll leave it.

-AC

Alliance, many people here could pick apart at your posts, and correct all your grammar mistakes. Plus, you're like what 21? Get a grip mate, you're not exactly a wizened, old academic.

Originally posted by chillmeistergen
Alliance, many people here could pick apart at your posts, and correct all your grammar mistakes. Plus, you're like what 21? Get a grip mate, you're not exactly a wizened, old academic.

Nice of you to save me the time of typing that up.

Would have added a few "you pretentious cocky *******" and "****ing arrogant yahoo"'s though.

Originally posted by chillmeistergen
Alliance, many people here could pick apart at your posts, and correct all your grammar mistakes. Plus, you're like what 21? Get a grip mate, you're not exactly a wizened, old academic.

I didn't pick apart anyone's posts and a rarely call people on spelling or grammar. I did neither in this case. And you're like what, 18? Get a grip, I brought up an entirely relevant dimension to this problem that no one else is addressing between their screams of horror. I asked for a little bit of damn sensibility when addessing this issue. This is not a question of whether or not you like hacking up fetuses, its a question of medical procedure. Examine it as such.

...And if age is what matters to you, then I'm older and wizeneder.

first of all, "partial birth abortion" doesn't exist. It's a term made up by right wing morons that americans are dumb enough to think are intellectual titans. The procedure is called dilation and extraction and is done almost exclusively in cases where the child has an approximatley zero chance of survival beyond the first 2 years and especially in those cases where the delivery of said child will seriously endanger the mother due to birth defects.

Call it what you will, it doesn't change what it is... is this procedure legal and available for any reason as a 'normal' abortion?