Originally posted by srankmissingninit would be fallacious if wolverine hadn't stated he was.
No, I'm saying that a peak human could shrug off that attack, so assuming that Wolverine used his powers to aid him is completely fallacious. Try and keep up please.The advantages Wolverine was "stated" to have were what? Claws. Which he didn't use. Healing factor. Which he didn't use. Enhanced senses. Which afford him no real advantages in a melee exchange. We aren't ignoring dialogue, what we are doing is [b]acknowledging the events as they occurred on the panels,
and those events don't support the statement. Pretty f@cking simple.
That isn't a full mount. Google it. 😆He didn't get up because he was ****ed up. He is still on the ground two pages latter. He couldn't even get up when Wolverine wasn't on top of him. Wolverine had Shang-Chi in a full mount. His head was wedged in between two bars. Wolverine was holding his head in place. He wouldn't have been able to get free. [/B]
you're assuming he wasn't using his healing factor and again wolverine stated and we see shang chi thinking that wolverine enhancements are surprising.
sitting on your opponents chest is not a full mount, in a full mount your legs are straddling your opponent, which is still not what wolverine was doing.
I'm done with this, you change your argument depending on who Wolverine is against, I've heard you say Wolverine is just as much a god as Thor is and now when it benefit Wolverine his attributes are comparable to his.
It's ridiculous.
regardless you've stated that wolverine and shang-chi are of comparable stats, meaning ironfist should completely eclipse him.