Cloverfield

Originally posted by FistOfThe North
They military should've napalmed the damed thing right over the facial area. Followed by bunker busting it right in the back and blow it's guts out.

How do you know they didn't?

As you may have noticed.. the Monster wasn't even in view for 90% of the movie.

Originally posted by Blax_Hydralisk
How do you know they didn't?

As you may have noticed.. the Monster wasn't even in view for 90% of the movie.

Because the monster was clearly alive at the end of the movie. And had those attacks i mentioned happened, it would've been standing in the end.

You kidding me, a combo of napalm and bunker busters would've destroyed the thing. Aerially napalming the eyes, mouth, and face with the sticky fiery chemical followed by steel penetrating bunker busters to the head and back would've completely killed it within minutes.

That would've been my command.

But who knows, maybe they did it after the footage but that's unlikely cause there's gonna there's a confirmed sequel. With the thing obviously still in it, i'm assuming, since we didn't see it die. Unless that last explosion at the end killed it. Or there were more of them.

Originally posted by FistOfThe North
[B]Because the monster was clearly alive at the end of the movie. And had those attacks i mentioned happened, it would've been standing in the end.

You kidding me, a combo of napalm and bunker busters would've destroyed the thing. Aerially napalming the eyes, mouth, and face with the sticky fiery chemical followed by steel penetrating bunker busters to the head and back would've completely killed it within minutes.

That would've been my command.

You don't know any of this at all.

Nothing we saw them do to i worked, so what logic is there behind knowing without a doubt that that would have worked?

Originally posted by Blax_Hydralisk
You don't know any of this at all.

Nothing we saw them do to i worked, so what logic is there behind knowing without a doubt that that would have worked?

We did see the weapons the military utilized and none of them were in no way more effective that napalm and bunker busters. I'm referring to tactical weaponry and not the standard issue stuff like the weapons used or what we seen used. (to no avail)

Iz was wunderin wut if they make anotha one viewed thru a different camera? Datw ould be tiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Originally posted by Mairuzu
where the fvck was spiderman

LMAO! Pissing his pants no doubt. Spiderman couldnt take that thing. Now get Goku in there and bam...Monster gone.

Originally posted by FistOfThe North
We did see the weapons the military utilized and none of them were in no way more effective that napalm and bunker busters. I'm referring to tactical weaponry and not the standard issue stuff like the weapons used or what we seen used. (to no avail)

But my point, is that we only see a fraction of the fighting that went on.

How do you know they didn't try that when Rob and company were in the tunnel, for example?

Originally posted by Blax_Hydralisk
But my point, is that we only see a fraction of the fighting that went on.

How do you know they didn't try that when Rob and company were in the tunnel, for example?

I completely agree. We dont know all the measures they took to destroy the monster. I assumed that the military did all they could before the Hammerdown Protocol.

Exactly.

I'm sure the Military would try something like that first, as oppsoed to dropping ""the mother of all bombs", which most likely decimated most of central park.

They used the Mother of All Bombs, according to J.J. Abrams.

Let's not avoid the fact that

Spoiler:
the monster is a baby, so who knows what an adult one could withstand? If there are any, I mean.

Also...

Spoiler:
what does everyone think of the Slusho! connection? I think the "deep sea ingredient" is what they were drilling for on the rig that the monster destroyed, and the rig was owned by the company Rob was going to work for in Japan. We know the two companies are connected cos it says so on the Slusho! site. Not sure what the point of all that would be, if J.J. Abrams is saying that a satellite crashing into the ocean is what woke the thing up. Unless THAT is what they were trying to recover with the rig.

Of course, this is all fruitless if none of you have visited the site.

-AC

So they nuked it?

I have no idea, the M.O.A.B. isn't a nuke, it's the closest thing to.

Central Park is gone, I know that much.

"Area formerly known as Central Park.". So the tape was obviously discovered after.

-AC

Originally posted by Micheal_Myers
LMAO! Pissing his pants no doubt. Spiderman couldnt take that thing...

But Superman can! And they mention him as they walk down the tunnel. 😉

Originally posted by Robtard
So they nuked it?

Not true. You'd be surprised how many things can survive a nuclear explosion.

When Hiroshima was nuked, there were actually people who were only a couple blocks away from the blast who survived..

but I don't think it's a nuke either.

Seriously, that movie was mediocre at best and not worth all this hullabaloo.

Originally posted by =Tired Hiker=
Seriously, that movie was mediocre at best and not worth all this hullabaloo.

Yeah, it depends on how much it's been built up for you. I thought it was going to be a load of crap, like a typical new movie, but I ended up being somewhat impressed, cause it wasn't crap.

And my Dad tagged along with me, and he thought it was going to be great, when he ended up getting a bit disappointed.

A good movie, but it's not the best movie of the year.

where does it say the monster is a baby?

JJ said it was.

There's a reason I used spoiler tags, Mai.

-AC