Originally posted by darthgoober
Who, MM and Lobo? Yeah I don't think either of them have better durability than Supes, just regeneration. Supes has them beat in strait up resisting damage. So even though we don't have many instances of Supes level characters RESISTING the OE, we don't have many instances of him erasing them either? If that's the case, how exactly do you see Supes resisting them to be PIS since they've never been used successfully against someone with Supes durability?At least a couple of them were.
DS has erased gods before if I'm not mistaken. Unless Superman is a god.
Originally posted by quanchi112
nope nice try. but he just said its a small part of his near infifnite energies. hes not as powerful as he is letting on for one. he is referring to ds real form being beaten also. of cousre his avatar can be beaten why would ds have to say that. its much weaker than the real deal. he said the real deal can be beeten to if the opponent is strong enough. 😉
OMG. I'm speechless. You are truly something else. DS says that avatars are only a small part of his near infinite power. And that an avatar can be beaten if the opponent is powerful enough. Thus retconning his losses against Superman. He tells also that he can't be beaten in the physical. Superman once even commented on this.
Originally posted by nvrbeenwthagirlur wrong...it says his true form can be beaten. 😆
OMG. I'm speechless. You are truly something else. DS says that avatars are only a small part of his near infinite power. And that an avatar can be beaten if the opponent is powerful enough. Thus retconning his losses against Superman. He tells also that he can't be beaten in the physical. Superman once even commented on this.
"it is something he prefers not to do,"(he doesnt do this that often and wouldnt send an avatar to fight superman when he can lose his whole stinking planet, what is he a moron?) "however,as the avatar is SO MCUH WEAKERthan his true form." meaning his avatar sucks ass. "It can be beaten in battle, if the opponent is strong enough." he just told u his avatars are weak as shit and just admitted his true form can lose if the opponenet is strong enough. answer superman. 😆
Originally posted by quanchi112
"it is something he prefers not to do,"(he doesnt do this that often and wouldnt send an avatar to fight superman when he can lose his whole stinking planet, what is he a moron?) "however,as the avatar is SO MCUH WEAKERthan his true form." meaning his avatar sucks ass. "It can be beaten in battle, if the opponent is strong enough." he just told u his avatars are weak as shit and just admitted his true form can lose if the opponenet is strong enough. answer superman. 😆
He says the avatar is so much weaker than it (the avatar) can be beaten 😐
Originally posted by quanchi112
"it is something he prefers not to do,"(he doesnt do this that often and wouldnt send an avatar to fight superman when he can lose his whole stinking planet, what is he a moron?) "however,as the avatar is SO MCUH WEAKERthan his true form." meaning his avatar sucks ass. "It can be beaten in battle, if the opponent is strong enough." he just told u his avatars are weak as shit and just admitted his true form can lose if the opponenet is strong enough. answer superman. 😆
Originally posted by quanchi112to starking. and his pretty pictures.
"it is something he prefers not to do,"(he doesnt do this that often and wouldnt send an avatar to fight superman when he can lose his whole stinking planet, what is he a moron?) "however,as the avatar is SO MCUH WEAKERthan his true form." meaning his avatar sucks ass. "It can be beaten in battle, if the opponent is strong enough." he just told u his avatars are weak as shit and just admitted his true form can lose if the opponenet is strong enough. answer superman. 😆
Originally posted by quanchi112
no hes saying that his true form can also be beaten in battle. true form can do down also if the opponent is strong enough. 😛
Reading comprehension problems?
I'll walk you through it:
He prefers not to do this because the avatar is so much weaker than his true form. It (note that the subject hasn't changed we're still talking about the avatar here) can even be beaten in battle.
Originally posted by Symmetric Chaosno he has changed it from avatar to true form. true form is mentioned last and he then describes how that to can be beaten if the opponent is indeed strong enough. it makes sense becuz in the paragraph before he told u how weak ds avatars were. so why would he be talking about the weak ass avatar? he was talking about how hiw true form can go down if someone is tough enough. 😉
Reading comprehension problems?I'll walk you through it:
He prefers not to do this because the avatar is so much weaker than his true form. It (note that the subject hasn't changed we're still talking about the avatar here) can even be beaten in battle.
Originally posted by quanchi112
no he has changed it from avatar to true form. true form is mentioned last and he then describes how that to can be beaten if the opponent is indeed strong enough. it makes sense becuz in the paragraph before he told u how weak ds avatars were. so why would he be talking about the weak ass avatar? he was talking about how hiw true form can go down if someone is tough enough. 😉
Well either you're joking or retarded or both. Doesn't really matter to me srug