Originally posted by NihilistOk.
No, im talking about a Surfer comic featuring Drax,Champion,Nova.
Champion even states that Thanos teleported him when he first meets Drax/Surfer.You dont win, you have to prove he was using the gun a you first stated he did, and as there is no idication he even used one, its safe to say youre wrong.Like i said do you see Thanos carrying a gun? is he holding the gun straight after he FB's Odin? no, nothing of the sort.
He turned a skrull to stone, and Skrulls have complete control of there molecular structre.
Death gave him the upgrade before Thanos Quest,IG,IW,IC in Rebirth of Thanos, so power the same lvl during them as when Drax killed him in Annihilation.
You know the gun right...?The one he shot thor with?Then pointed strait at surfer?It showed him use it.It didn't show him use it when he forceblocked odin.So you can't say either way WIth gun:1, without gun:2
Originally posted by KuRuPT ThanosiI always assumed they did keep the knowledge...
Yes these are the rules. Go ask Bada or PR if you please but these are the rules. If they weren't Thanos would be even more powerful on here.. Imagine if someone as smart as Thanos could come back with knowledge of their first encounter or second etc etc... That would make him better.As far as adaptation goes... If you can adapt on the fly during battle.. then you can... but once you're put down you come back with no knowledge of the first fight nor any adaptations from it.
Originally posted by batdude123Oh!Owned!
"The Battle
Due to some confusion, I will highlight this now. Unless otherwise specified in the opening post, the matches are one fight. The use of a character winning 7/10 is just to highlight a percentage or odds. There has never been anything in the rules which states there are 10 separate fights."
Originally posted by Black bolt zIts funny you take this stance on this subject, when ODG suggested Thanos used shield against Odin depsite it not been show or implied, you disagreed with him(which Bada ruled against ODG's claim of having no on panel proof) yet here you are doing the exact opposite.
Ok.You know the gun right...?The one he shot thor with?Then pointed strait at surfer?It showed him use it.It didn't show him use it when he forceblocked odin.So you can't say either way WIth gun:1, without gun:2
Its clear no gun was in sight/that he didnt have a gun and he had incoperated it into his power set.
Originally posted by KuRuPT ThanosiNo it doesn't.And HP DD can adapt in the middle of the battle.
what ws owned about that LOL. It backs up my side.
Originally posted by NihilistWhat?That statement makes absolutely no sense.
Its funny you take this stance on this subject, when ODG suggested Thanos used shield against Odin depsite it not been show or implied, you disagreed with him(which Bada ruled against ODG's claim of having no on panel proof) yet here you are doing the exact opposite.Its clear no gun was in sight/that he didnt have a gun and he had incoperated it into his power set.
No its not.He didn't have the gun.It didn't show it.But hes been shown to do it with the gun.The evidence backs me up more then it does you.
Originally posted by Black bolt zyour argument also works the other way b/c thanos did it without a gun as well in the same story arc and iirc the art work specifically focused on his eye and a gleam as an indication of power activation. 😉
No it doesn't.And HP DD can adapt in the middle of the battle. What?That statement makes absolutely no sense.No its not.He didn't have the gun.It didn't show it.But hes been shown to do it with the gun.The evidence backs me up more then it does you.
Originally posted by King CastleIt showed nothing of him.It didn't show him when you did it.
your argument also works the other way b/c thanos did it without a gun as well in the same story arc and iirc the art work specifically focused on his eye and a gleam as an indication of power activation. 😉
And in case you haven't noticed 50% of the time thanos has an evil twinkle in his eye.
Originally posted by Black bolt zYou agreed ODG had to have some showing of proof or statement that it implied he used a shield against Odin, that same rule applies here.
[B]No it doesn't.And HP DD can adapt in the middle of the battle. What?That statement makes absolutely no sense.
Thanos used a shield against Thor but not against Odin, same here he used a gun against Thor and not against Odin, you even agreed that Thanos using a shield against Thor isnt proof enough he used it against Odin, but on this point all of a sudden him using it agianst Thor is proof enough he used it against Odin.
No its not.He didn't have the gun.It didn't show it.But hes been shown to do it with the gun.The evidence backs me up more then it does you.You have just admitted he didnt have the gun, so how did he use the force block? by his own command thats how.Its clear he incorperated it into his power set, just like he has done before with other bio amplification devices(stated several times on panel), if you have any proof or anything hinting/implying he used a gun against Odin then post it otherwise its speculation (and in mod ruling, isnt proof enough)
Originally posted by Black bolt z
No it doesn't.And HP DD can adapt in the middle of the battle. What?That statement makes absolutely no sense.No its not.He didn't have the gun.It didn't show it.But hes been shown to do it with the gun.The evidence backs me up more then it does you.
Yes IT DOES. It is ONE battle.. there is NO coming back with adaptation or knowledge like you thought. How the F do you think that supports your view? It supports mine.
kinda hard to argue against it here:
Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
Yes IT DOES. It is ONE battle.. there is NO coming back with adaptation or knowledge like you thought. How the F do you think that supports your view? It supports mine.
Doomsday has adapted in battle on at least one occasion. When he fought Superman, and Maxima. Superman noticed that Doomsday was growing in strength. This is a clear case of Doomsday adapting on the fly, and not having to be killed in order for him to adapt.
Originally posted by NihilistI never said anything about a sheild against odin.Thanos didn't use is sheild in that fight.
You agreed ODG had to have some showing of proof or statement that it implied he used a shield against Odin, that same rule applies here.Thanos used a shield against Thor but not against Odin, same here he used a gun against Thor and not against Odin, you even agreed that Thanos using a shield against Thor isnt proof enough he used it against Odin, but on this point all of a sudden him using it agianst Thor is proof enough he used it against Odin.
You have just admitted he didnt have the gun, so how did he use the force block? by his own command thats how.Its clear he incorperated it into his power set, just like he has done before with other bio amplification devices(stated several times on panel), if you have any proof or anything hinting/implying he used a gun against Odin then post it otherwise its speculation (and in mod ruling, isnt proof enough)
He didn't use a sheild against thor either...and he wasn't shown when using the FB on odin.But he was shown using the gun on thor.So i'm still winning.
He wasn't shown to have the gun or not.It didn't shown him when he used the FB on Odin.But he was only shown to have used it against thor with the gun.I still
Originally posted by KuRuPT ThanosiIts only one battle.HP DD adapts in the middle of the battle.And wins.
Yes IT DOES. It is ONE battle.. there is NO coming back with adaptation or knowledge like you thought. How the F do you think that supports your view? It supports mine.
Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
Yes IT DOES. It is ONE battle.. there is NO coming back with adaptation or knowledge like you thought. How the F do you think that supports your view? It supports mine.
I know how you feel. Blackbolt is the most irritating debator I have played against since debating on kmc. He erks my nerve... drives me INSANE with his "no he didn't" or "yes he did" comments.
Originally posted by Black bolt zThis convinces me that you havent read the arc at all and are just trolling.
I never said anything about a sheild against odin.Thanos didn't use is sheild in that fight.He didn't use a sheild against thor either...and he wasn't shown when using the FB on odin.But he was shown using the gun on thor.So i'm still winning.
He wasn't shown to have the gun or not.It didn't shown him when he used the FB on Odin.But he was only shown to have used it against thor with the gun.I still Its only one battle.HP DD adapts in the middle of the battle.And wins.
Originally posted by Omega Vision
Lol wut?The Imperiex Probe pwned Supergirl. Granted it was a cheap shot but still...
Huh?
It was supergirl that was physically fighting the probe while black lightning was shooting it from a distance.
The sad thing is... that probe got taken out by a bomb that didn't even level the small area that the fight took place in. You are seriously overating them. I also seen two probes getting taken out with a ship to the back of the head.
They weren't even mid herald worthy if you ask me. The first probe that superman fought was the only one worth bragging about and even then , that probe had to build a device to destroy earth because it couldn't do it under its own power... I don't think imperex made all of them that powerful.
Originally posted by Nihilist
This convinces me that you havent read the arc at all and are just trolling.
Yep because thanos "did" use his shields but thor hammered straight through it. That is why I was like WOW when I read his post and its pretty obvious thanos didn't have a gun on him. First thing, that gun was big as hell that thanos shot thor with and we seen thanos numerous of time in that fight against odin and there wasnt a big ass gun visible. So he either shitted the gun out and then shot it at odin or he never came to the battle with a gun.
I don't even know why people is arguing with him about this since the proof is on him. He need to prove that thanos walked around with that weapon because its pretty much safe to say that he added it to his power since he has done similar things in the past.
Is there seriously an assumption that Thanos can't/didn't produce the force block against Odin just because he used tech previously against Thor? I might be able to lift 60kg under my own power. Would using a pully system mean that I can't lift said weight? Nope. It just means that I can lift that weight easier. Regardless of whether it is within his own abilities or a tech-based augmentation, it's part of his basic equipment from the get-go.
Originally posted by carver9
Huh?It was supergirl that was physically fighting the probe while black lightning was shooting it from a distance.
The sad thing is... that probe got taken out by a bomb that didn't even level the small area that the fight took place in. You are seriously overating them. I also seen two probes getting taken out with a ship to the back of the head.
They weren't even mid herald worthy if you ask me. The first probe that superman fought was the only one worth bragging about and even then , that probe had to build a device to destroy earth because it couldn't do it under its own power... I don't think imperex made all of them that powerful.
