Originally posted by Dark-Jaxx
Not really.I'm just doing this cause it's late and I'm bored. 😛
I typically don't get in religious debates cause you will get flamed by either the Bible Thumpers of the Atheists if you disagree with them, but since I know Becci I do not have to worry about that. 131
*Flames*
Originally posted by Dark-Jaxx
Meh.Personally, I AM a Christian, but I just don't take every word the Bible says as infallible fact.
I was raised Catholic, and kinda realised when I was young that I really didn't believe anything I was being taught and that it made no logical sense to me.
I don't care what other people believe, just don't use your beliefs to put me down. And don't try and change my mind. But I'm also of the opinion that religion should be a highly personal thing - what I believe or don't doesn't affect you at all, and vice versa, unless you let it.
I'm pretty "live and let live" about a lot of things.
Originally posted by PeachHEATHEN!!! 😠
I was raised Catholic, and kinda realised when I was young that I really didn't believe anything I was being taught and that it made no logical sense to me.I don't care what other people believe, just don't use your beliefs to put me down. And don't try and change my mind. But I'm also of the opinion that religion should be a highly personal thing - what I believe or don't doesn't affect you at all, and vice versa, unless you let it.
I'm pretty "live and let live" about a lot of things.
😛
Originally posted by PeachI'm similar.
*shrugs* 😛Despite my scatterbrained-ness and seeming complete lack (and disdain) for logic, I'm a very logically- and scientifically-minded person. It just makes more sense to me.
Alot of things I do and think even I cannot explain, but based on my own personal knowledge and opinion, I would say God is the most logical.
Nice rule change peach and GK. all the people that they mentioned were waayyy to strong.
jaxx you and becci have some pretty good arguements and both of you come up with extremely good points...... which makes me feel stupid 😄
i was at this mini route 66 type thing in my city and some guy was preaching to everybody. he said all people who are not catholic should go to hell. he even included christianity, and being similar in a lot of ways, was stupid on his part. there not exactly the same, but what he was saying made no sense. i told him to shut up and stop preaching to me, but he told me i was gonna go to hell agian. so just to piss him off i said i was satanic, and it worked lol.i hate it when ppl do that.
also you made a good point jaxx when you said a lot of stuff in the bible is jibberish.... because it is 😱
It's not jibberish, it's just not always literal, and often misinterpreted.
I think it's funny how people can interpret a guy pulling out of a chick right before ejaculating and getting in trouble for it as "masturbation is a sin!". It's not a sin, if retarded fundie christians would read the context they'd realize that the chick the dude was screwing was the wife of his brother, who had died. At that point in time it was a law that if your brother died you had to bear her a child. He went for the nookie but skipped out on the child giving, which was illegal. It has nothing to do with masturbation.
There is no verse in the bible that states that masturbation is wrong.
Apparently the FBI cares, though.
i think its silly that you ban certain characters from debates:
"Pyron, whose actual limitations are not known"
for example can be probably said about 100 characters, very few characters have known limitations, simply a number of feats. Pyron is no undefeatable thats for sure, same with Ganon but Pyramid head is lol...since he apprently just cannot be stopped but hes os unbearably slow he prob couldnt stop anyone either.
Originally posted by Burning thought
i think its silly that you ban certain characters from debates:"Pyron, whose actual limitations are not known"
for example can be probably said about 100 characters, very few characters have known limitations, simply a number of feats. Pyron is no undefeatable thats for sure, same with Ganon but Pyramid head is lol...since he apprently just cannot be stopped but hes os unbearably slow he prob couldnt stop anyone either.
The characters themselves are not banned. Only what parts of them that make them undefeatable. I know that you do not think Ganon or Pyron are undefeatable, but not everything is a snap of a finger. Ganon can not be in most fights due to the Light arrow/sword thing. Pyron is an extreme case of 'no limitation', due to the fact that we know no limit to his size, we do not know the extent of his powers and such. Sure we do not know the limit of, for example, Illidan, but we know roughly where his extent of power takes a halt. It is not like those three characters listed are the ones banned, but all characters that has no appearant way of being defeated.
Pyron was only ever defeated after having limited himself to a large degree. Pyramide Head is just about undefeatable without the right advesary. Ganon would be a good matchup many times, but has only the Light weakness, limiting the amount of characters able to defeat him.
The new rule merely limits the whole Unstoppable Force <> Immovable Object logic used in fights. Ganon is supposively an immovable object (Matter of relevance of course), with the one weakness being Light arrows. The rule is merely there to make some fights more even than they otherwise should have been. This also allows you to avoid stupid debates revolving ways to bypass said Immovable "Force".
To sum up, yes the Pyramid head is one of those villains who is immortal no matter what way you look at it, the only thing that can "defeat" it, is James own self confidence and will, unless restrictions are placed on it you will get endless vague matches with the Pyramid head, where it just owns the other challenger in the duel...thus it cannot be beat = bad Vs. match.
Same goes for other villains who have this sort of problem.
which would win? and unstoppable force or an immovable object? just curious, because i came up with a theory:
a lot of you will say that "nothing will happen, they will cancel eachother out" but if they cancel eachother out, then the unstopable force would be stopped, which makes it stoppable. if an unstopable force meets an immovable object, then it has to either:
a. the unstoppable force moves the immovable object, which thus the force is the winner and the object is no longer immovable, or
b. they meet and nothing moves, which would make the unstoppable object the winner because the unstoppable force was stopped.
i just wanna hear wut you guys have to say because you guys have many view points, and i have found you guys are a lot smarter than me =)
Originally posted by k1Lla441
which would win? and unstoppable force or an immovable object? just curious, because i came up with a theory:a lot of you will say that "nothing will happen, they will cancel eachother out" but if they cancel eachother out, then the unstopable force would be stopped, which makes it stoppable. if an unstopable force meets an immovable object, then it has to either:
a. the unstoppable force moves the immovable object, which thus the force is the winner and the object is no longer immovable, or
b. they meet and nothing moves, which would make the unstoppable object the winner because the unstoppable force was stopped.
i just wanna hear wut you guys have to say because you guys have many view points, and i have found you guys are a lot smarter than me =)
Have you read what we spoke of last page? I say what I have always said: There is no such thing as an Immovable Object. Just like with the Unstoppable Force, it is all a matter of relevance. An Immovable Object in for example Final Fantasy might very much so be moved by an Unstoppable Force from Warcraft.
An object is only always relatively Immovable. This is mere speculations of course, since an Immovable Object has never clashed with an Unstoppable Force.
I think neither will win and they would both cancel eachother out, I think a paradox will happen where both win, the unstoppable force breaks through the imovable object while the object doesnt move in a way the human mind could not understand.
But to human understand, imo neither excist, same with omnipotence etc etc
Originally posted by Burning thought
I think neither will win and they would both cancel eachother out, I think a paradox will happen where both win, the unstoppable force breaks through the imovable object while the object doesnt move in a way the human mind could not understand.But to human understand, imo neither excist, same with omnipotence etc etc
If it breaks trough, the object is not Immovable. If the force budges upon clash with the immovable, it is not Unstoppable. It is all a matter of relativity. A true clash between the two would be incomprehensible, given the fact that there is no fact of what could happen. An immovable object has never clashed with an unstoppable force in real life.
Originally posted by Burning thought
i think its silly that you ban certain characters from debates:"Pyron, whose actual limitations are not known"
for example can be probably said about 100 characters, very few characters have known limitations, simply a number of feats. Pyron is no undefeatable thats for sure, same with Ganon but Pyramid head is lol...since he apprently just cannot be stopped but hes os unbearably slow he prob couldnt stop anyone either.
Please do yourself a favor and actually READ the rules.
They're not banned.