Originally posted by Terryc250All that is gameplay mechanics, gameplay mechanics are bullshit. I go by cutscenes, feats, and other canon sources. In Zelda TP in a cutscene Ganon is shown to be very fast, yet when you fight him he is reduced to a slow walk. That's an example of bullshit gameplay mechanics.
If u put things that way, alot of things in video games dont make sense, yes, you dont see cloud getting any scratches throughout the game when he gets slashed, but in other games, you can play as a character and accidently fall into a bottomless pit, then all of a sudden appear back on the ground with just HP taken off.a LOT of things in video games dont make sense and doesnt syncronize with real life, you would think a LARGE bahamut zero blast from outer space should really destroy the whole battlefield while playing, but does it even make a hole in the ground? No, it just does damage; however, even though it doesnt make sense, its still not considered an illusion, its just a video game.
Face it, things in video games just dont make sense if u try to compare it with real life, so if it doesnt make sense or is too unreal, it doesnt mean its an illusion, it just means its a video game.
Originally posted by Superboy Prime
He merely described gameplay mechanics. If that made you have a hard-on fine by me, but it takes more than that to convince me, sorry.
So ur saying, in all video games, things that are more close to lifelike in ur opinion are things the characters actually do and the rest of the things that YOU think the character cant do are just illusions?
Its ignorant to just single out the summon supernova and call it an illusion(while all the other summons r real) without any proof just because YOU think sephiroth is not capable of doing that
ill say it again, somethings in video games are not realistic according to real life; but it doesnt mean its an illusion, things that arent life-like happen ALL the time in video games.
Originally posted by Violent2Dope
All that is gameplay mechanics, gameplay mechanics are bullshit. I go by cutscenes, feats, and other canon sources. In Zelda TP in a cutscene Ganon is shown to be very fast, yet when you fight him he is reduced to a slow walk. That's an example of bullshit gameplay mechanics.
How so? So 97% of the game is bullshit and the 3% cutscenes are real? Some can argue that cutscenes are for looks.
Anyway, ur basically stating that the characters are even more impressive in cutscenes then in the actual gameplay and just because supernova didnt happen during a cutscene doesnt mean it wouldnt happen at all.
Originally posted by Terryc250So you actually think cloud can indeed take a Solar System's destruction, yet he can't take a sword to the shoulder. Also, read my previous post.
So ur saying, in all video games, things that are more close to lifelike in ur opinion are things the characters actually do and the rest of the things that YOU think the character cant do are just illusions?Its ignorant to just single out the summon supernova and call it an illusion(while all the other summons r real) without any proof just because YOU think sephiroth is not capable of doing that
ill say it again, somethings in video games are not realistic according to real life; but it doesnt mean its an illusion, things that arent life-like happen ALL the time in video games.
^ what do u mean? What does the destruction other planets have anything to do with cloud? The supernova doesnt hit cloud it hits other planets.
And what do u mean by he cant take a sword to the shoulder? He took it, pulled it out and continued fighting like it was nothing. Are u trying to say that the sword shouldnt have cut him? Its a legendary sword that cuts basically through anything.
This bastard cheated.
^ What you're doing is being a jerk and can't debate with me so you try to attack me with petty things like "omg u spelled what wrong!"
FBI is a real acronym that u can actually find in the dictionary, "ftw" is comparable to "brb", "wtf", "lol", and other acroyms that are by the way, was created originally by people who didn't feel like typing out the the whole thing (lazy). Proves my point that your a hyprocrite.
I cant make a complete sentence? Well let me know if these are 100% complete sentence Mr. Einstein
"..
>.> <.<
Co-Signed."
"Inability to spell ftw."
"Right."
Those are the sentences i've seen you come up with in the last couple pages of this thread.
So dont go picking at stupid things to try to put me down, this is a forum not english class.
3 of those 5 were complete sentences. I notice that you're using complete sentences now, though. So apparently I had an effect on you. Excellent.
And "ftw" and "lol" can both be found in dictionaries. So ha.
And why would I need to effortlessly destroy your arguments and make a fool of you when you're doing it quite well by yourself.
Originally posted by BlaxicanHydra
3 of those 5 were complete sentences. I notice that you're using complete sentences now, though. So apparently I had an effect on you. Excellent.And "ftw" and "lol" can both be found in dictionaries. So ha.
And why would I need to effortlessly destroy your arguments and make a fool of you when you're doing it quite well by yourself.
Apparantly you dont know what a proper complete sentence is. A proper sentence expresses a complete thought.
If you were righting an english test and you had to put a tick by "yes" or "no" if the following was a complete sentence or not, and the questions were:
"Right."
"Inability to spell."
"Co-signed."
You would say those are all complete sentences?
If you would, you are even more dumb then i thought.
Those are not complete sentences, they are replies.
and "ftw" is not in any dictionary to my knowledge; heck, its not even in dictionary.com which contains multiple dictionaries.
And you're saying I'M making a fool out of myself? HA.
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=F.T.W.
313
I would say so, especially "Inability to spell ftw." Since I'm using an acronym. Or would you say that "I was visited by the FBI. " wasn't a complete sentence either? I certainly hope not.
And yes.. yes I said you were making a fool out of yourself. Why would you need to ask, the post is right there.
HAHA oh god,
first of all,
"I was visited by the FBI. " IS a complete sentence, it can be translated to:
"I was visited by the Federal Bureau of Investigation."
"I" is the topic, "I" what? I was visited by the FBI. It completes a thought yes?
However, "Inability to spell for the win." Won't even make sense to alot of people, theres no topic, and its not even proper english, its like some kind of net talk.
UrbanDictionary? HAHA, so now "skizzle" is a real word too huh?